EZ-blocker Versus Left Sided Double Lumen Tube in Adult Patients for Thoracic Surgery

NCT ID: NCT03403192

Last Updated: 2021-10-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

163 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-26

Study Completion Date

2019-10-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the positional stability and quality of lung isolation provided by the EZ-blocker compared to a DLT for both right and left sided thoracic surgery.

An additional objective will be to assess time to placement of both devices and other significant clinical differences between these two approaches to placement of the bronchial blocker (BB) including airway injury and post-operatives sore throat, post-operative hoarseness, Additionally we would like to examine the preoperative high resolution CT imaging data to determine if there are anatomic landmarks that may potentially inform the appropriateness or inappropriateness of choosing an EZ-blocker or left sided DLT.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

One lung ventilation (OLV) is frequently used in thoracic surgery to promote surgical exposure and improve operative conditions. At this time, there are two different approaches to OLV in routine use in adult thoracic surgery. One approach is to use of a double lumen tube (DLT). The other approach is to use a bronchial blocker (BB). Currently there are several different types of bronchial BBs on the market.

The EZ-Blocker essentially functions as a bronchial blocker with a 7-Fr shaft with two separate occlusive balloons coming off this shaft in a "Y" configuration designed to rest on the carina. Once anchored in place the operator can choose to inflate one of the two occlusive balloons to isolate one main stem bronchus or the other.

A number of studies have been performed comparing BBs to DLTs looking at time and ease of placement, differences in quality of lung isolation, and incidence of sore throat, hoarseness, and other morbidity associated with placement. A recent meta-analysis published by Clayton-Smith et al found that BBs are associated with fewer airway injuries when compared to DLTs. They found the quality of isolation to be equivalent between BBs and DLTs. While quality of isolation over all may be comparable, it has been demonstrated in several studies that positional stability of bronchial blockers such as the Arndt or Cohen, is frequently inferior to that of a DLT.

At this time, there are a small number of trials looking at the use of the EZ-blocker in adult patients. In one study published in 2013 the EZ-blocker was compared to the Cohen Flex-Tip blocker. In this study they found that time to place the EZ-blocker was in fact shorter and that overall the number of repositioning required was less with the EZ-blocker. In 2013, a study was published by Mourisse et al which compared DLT to the EZ-blocker. In this study they found initial malposition of both devices to be fairly equivalent, and time to placement was longer with the EZ-blocker. They also found more tracheal and bronchial injuries in the DLT group, but importantly they found that positional stability was equivalent. In both of these studies however they did not design their studies to effectively differentiate between right and left sided procedures when quantifying the need for BB repositioning. Because the takeoff of the right upper lobe bronchus is sometimes adjacent to, or proximal to the carina, it can impede effective isolation with a BB. Therefore, claims of positional stability may rely heavily on the laterality of the procedure, with right sided isolation being significantly more labile than left sided especially with respect to isolation using a BB.

According to the manufactures recommendations the EZ-blocker is placed through a Y-piece adaptor included with the blocker kit. A flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (FFB) is placed in a separate limb of this Y-piece and this fed through alongside the EZ-blocker to visualize and confirm placement of the BB. The balloon is then inflated typically under direct vision to occlude that bronchus thus isolating that lung hopefully achieving full lung isolation.

In conclusion then, the study team feels that the potential morbidity of a DLT in terms of the potential for airway injury when compared to a BB suggests that further exploration of the possibility of equivalent positional stability between these devices is necessary. The team also feels that it is necessary to delineate the impact of laterality on the effectiveness of one technique for isolation versus the other.

In addition to this if there is a difference in stability in cases where right sided isolation via the EZ-blocker fails in the setting of multiple repositions or out and out failure the team would like to examine the preoperative high resolution CT data to determine if there are anatomic measurement which could potentially inform the appropriateness or inappropriateness of choosing a DLT over an EZ-blocker.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Thoracic Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The objective of this study is to evaluate the positional stability and quality of lung isolation provided by the EZ-blocker compared to a DLT for both right and left sided thoracic surgery
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers
The surgeon will be blinded to technique and queried as to the quality of isolation upon entry into the chest and this will be recorded.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EZ-Blocker in the left lung

This arm will receive the EZ-Blocker in the left lung of their body, which functions as a bronchial blocker.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

EZ-Blocker

Intervention Type DEVICE

The EZ-Blocker essentially functions as a bronchial blocker with a 7-Fr shaft with two separate occlusive balloons coming off this shaft in a "Y" configuration designed to rest on the carina. Once anchored in place the operator can choose to inflate one of the two occlusive balloons to isolate one main stem bronchus or the other. According to the manufactures recommendations the EZ-blocker is placed through a Y-piece adaptor included with the blocker kit. A flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (FFB) is placed in a separate limb of this Y-piece and this fed through along side the EZ-blocker to visualize and confirm placement of the of the BB. The balloon is then inflated typically under direct vision to occlude that bronchus thus isolating that lung hopefully achieving full lung isolation.

EZ-Blocker in right lung

This arm will receive the EZ-Blocker in the right lung of their body, which functions as a bronchial blocker.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

EZ-Blocker

Intervention Type DEVICE

The EZ-Blocker essentially functions as a bronchial blocker with a 7-Fr shaft with two separate occlusive balloons coming off this shaft in a "Y" configuration designed to rest on the carina. Once anchored in place the operator can choose to inflate one of the two occlusive balloons to isolate one main stem bronchus or the other. According to the manufactures recommendations the EZ-blocker is placed through a Y-piece adaptor included with the blocker kit. A flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (FFB) is placed in a separate limb of this Y-piece and this fed through along side the EZ-blocker to visualize and confirm placement of the of the BB. The balloon is then inflated typically under direct vision to occlude that bronchus thus isolating that lung hopefully achieving full lung isolation.

DLT in left lung

This arm will receive the DLT in the left lung of their body, which functions as a bronchial blocker.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

DLT

Intervention Type DEVICE

A Double Lumen Tube (DLT) is made of two small-lumen endotracheal tubes of unequal length fixed side by side. The shorter tube ends in the trachea while the longer tube is placed in either the right or left bronchus to ventilate the right or left lung.

DLT in right lung

This arm will receive the DLT in the right lung of their body, which functions as a bronchial blocker.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

DLT

Intervention Type DEVICE

A Double Lumen Tube (DLT) is made of two small-lumen endotracheal tubes of unequal length fixed side by side. The shorter tube ends in the trachea while the longer tube is placed in either the right or left bronchus to ventilate the right or left lung.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EZ-Blocker

The EZ-Blocker essentially functions as a bronchial blocker with a 7-Fr shaft with two separate occlusive balloons coming off this shaft in a "Y" configuration designed to rest on the carina. Once anchored in place the operator can choose to inflate one of the two occlusive balloons to isolate one main stem bronchus or the other. According to the manufactures recommendations the EZ-blocker is placed through a Y-piece adaptor included with the blocker kit. A flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (FFB) is placed in a separate limb of this Y-piece and this fed through along side the EZ-blocker to visualize and confirm placement of the of the BB. The balloon is then inflated typically under direct vision to occlude that bronchus thus isolating that lung hopefully achieving full lung isolation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

DLT

A Double Lumen Tube (DLT) is made of two small-lumen endotracheal tubes of unequal length fixed side by side. The shorter tube ends in the trachea while the longer tube is placed in either the right or left bronchus to ventilate the right or left lung.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients greater than 18 and 80 years of age scheduled for thoracoscopic surgery or thoracotomy requiring lung isolation
* Patient presenting as an outpatient for elective thoracic surgery
* In patients scheduled for thoracic surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

* History of difficult airway/intubation
* Patients suspected to have a difficult airway.
* Morbid obesity BMI \>39
* Pregnancy
* Emergency status of surgery
* Thoracic surgery requiring a right sided double lumen tube
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Benjamin N Morris, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistant Professor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Wake Forest Baptist Hospital

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mungroop HE, Wai PT, Morei MN, Loef BG, Epema AH. Lung isolation with a new Y-shaped endobronchial blocking device, the EZ-Blocker. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Jan;104(1):119-20. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep353. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20007802 (View on PubMed)

Dumans-Nizard V, Liu N, Laloe PA, Fischler M. A comparison of the deflecting-tip bronchial blocker with a wire-guided blocker or left-sided double-lumen tube. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009 Aug;23(4):501-5. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Apr 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19362014 (View on PubMed)

Campos JH, Hallam EA, Van Natta T, Kernstine KH. Devices for lung isolation used by anesthesiologists with limited thoracic experience: comparison of double-lumen endotracheal tube, Univent torque control blocker, and Arndt wire-guided endobronchial blocker. Anesthesiology. 2006 Feb;104(2):261-6, discussion 5A. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200602000-00010.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16436844 (View on PubMed)

Knoll H, Ziegeler S, Schreiber JU, Buchinger H, Bialas P, Semyonov K, Graeter T, Mencke T. Airway injuries after one-lung ventilation: a comparison between double-lumen tube and endobronchial blocker: a randomized, prospective, controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2006 Sep;105(3):471-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200609000-00009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16931978 (View on PubMed)

Clayton-Smith A, Bennett K, Alston RP, Adams G, Brown G, Hawthorne T, Hu M, Sinclair A, Tan J. A Comparison of the Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes and Bronchial Blockers in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Aug;29(4):955-66. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.11.017. Epub 2014 Dec 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25753765 (View on PubMed)

Kus A, Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Gul Akgul A, Solak M, Toker K. A comparison of the EZ-Blocker with a Cohen Flex-Tip blocker for one-lung ventilation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Aug;28(4):896-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Aug 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23958073 (View on PubMed)

Mourisse J, Liesveld J, Verhagen A, van Rooij G, van der Heide S, Schuurbiers-Siebers O, Van der Heijden E. Efficiency, efficacy, and safety of EZ-blocker compared with left-sided double-lumen tube for one-lung ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2013 Mar;118(3):550-61. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182834f2d.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23299364 (View on PubMed)

Piccioni F, Vecchi I, Spinelli E, Previtali P, Langer M. Extraluminal EZ-blocker Placement for One-lung Ventilation in Pediatric Thoracic Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Dec;29(6):e71-3. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.05.200. Epub 2015 May 27. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26342270 (View on PubMed)

Templeton TW, Downard MG, Simpson CR, Zeller KA, Templeton LB, Bryan YF. Bending the rules: a novel approach to placement and retrospective experience with the 5 French Arndt endobronchial blocker in children <2 years. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 May;26(5):512-20. doi: 10.1111/pan.12882. Epub 2016 Mar 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26956889 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00038220

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Physical Stabilization in Post-VATS
NCT04735614 COMPLETED NA