Quality of Life Assessment Before and After Essure Removal

NCT ID: NCT03401437

Last Updated: 2019-01-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

95 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-10

Study Completion Date

2018-11-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate quality of life before and after laparoscopic removal of the Essure® system. Women who complain about symptoms attributed to the Essure® device are expected to have an improved quality of life postoperatively.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Tubal sterilization is a widely used method of contraception. The hysteroscopic sterilization method (Essure®; Bayer, Germany) was approved in 2007 in France. Increasing patients reports of complications, such as bleeding pain, allergies, fatigue or articular pain have raised concerns about the safety device. Women suffering of alleged complications of the Essure® device ask for surgical removal. But, only few studies have assessed Essure® removal in terms of quality of life. This observational study contains two parts will be conducted at two academic tertiary care center (Montpellier - Marseille):

* a prospective part having received a favorable opinion from a Committee for the Protection of Persons,
* and a retrospective part having received a favorable opinion from the Institutional Review Board (IRB), local ethics committee

Patients: Women requesting surgical management for removal of Essure® for alleged adverse effects.

Assessment tools :

Quality of life with the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire (pre-operatively and at 1 and 3 months) Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale (pre-operatively and 3 months)

Preoperative imaging, procedure characteristics, including the Essure® removal method, operative findings, perioperative complications, histopathologic report, and length of hospital stay will be collected.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patients Presenting Essure Device Attributed Symptoms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Retrospective cohorte

Patients seen in consultation between January 2017 and August 2017, who have already completed the SF-36 questionnaire (pre-operative, M1 and M3), the HAD and ANSM questionnaires (pre-operative and M3)

No interventions assigned to this group

Prospective cohorte

Patients seen in consultation between August 2017

SF-36

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Evaluation of the quality of life with an auto-questionnaire validated, with 8 dimensions: physical activity ; limitations due to physical condition; physical pain; perceived health; vitality; life and relationship with others; limitations due to physical condition; psychic health as well as the assessment of perceived health compared to a year ago. Evaluation done pre-operatively, at M1 and M3

HAD

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Evaluation of anxiety and depression with a scale validated with 14 items assess between 0 and 3. Evaluation done pre-operatively and at M3.

ANSM

Intervention Type OTHER

Additional information requested by the ANSM (french National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety) following a materiovigilance report. Evaluation done pre-operatively and at M3.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SF-36

Evaluation of the quality of life with an auto-questionnaire validated, with 8 dimensions: physical activity ; limitations due to physical condition; physical pain; perceived health; vitality; life and relationship with others; limitations due to physical condition; psychic health as well as the assessment of perceived health compared to a year ago. Evaluation done pre-operatively, at M1 and M3

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

HAD

Evaluation of anxiety and depression with a scale validated with 14 items assess between 0 and 3. Evaluation done pre-operatively and at M3.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

ANSM

Additional information requested by the ANSM (french National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety) following a materiovigilance report. Evaluation done pre-operatively and at M3.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Short Form 36 Health Survey questionnaire Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale ANSM questionnaire

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients carrying Essure®
* Patients requesting surgical removal of Essure®
* Patients with adverse effect
* Being affiliated or benefiting from a French social security system

Exclusion Criteria

\- Patients with guardianship or curators
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

La Conception Hospital - Marseille - France

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Public Assistance - Marseille Hospitals

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Aix Marseille Université

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

PATRICE PC CROCHET, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University Hospital, Montpellier

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Public Assistance - Marseille Hospitals

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Montpellier University Hospital

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RECHMPL17_0154

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.