Perioperative Research Into Memory, Genomics in the Intensive Therapy Unit: Alzheimer's
NCT ID: NCT03393130
Last Updated: 2018-01-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
150 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-02-01
2019-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) causes cognitive impairment through a process of abnormal beta amyloid deposition and neuronal death through localised activation of the innate immune system. It is the most prevalent disease affecting cognition. The Apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene is implicated in the progression of late-onset Alzheimer's disease and is a recognised neuroinflammatory modulator. It is possible that young individuals exposed to high levels of inflammation may experience an acceleration of this process. This study sets out to look for an association between APOE-∈4 possession and poor cognitive outcome after a major burn injury and intensive care admission.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Predicting Cognitive Decline From Androgen Deprivation Therapy
NCT05820932
Clinical Utility of Early vs. Late Blood Biomarker Testing for Alzheimer's Disease
NCT06856681
Cognitive Decline in AD
NCT03946930
PRedicting the EVolution of SubjectIvE Cognitive Decline to Alzheimer's Disease With Machine Learning
NCT05569083
Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) and Metabolism
NCT03109561
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The current central dogma suggests an underlying neuroinflammatory dysregulation affecting neuronal function. However, the underlying pathological processes have not yet been fully elucidated. Although some risk factors have been recognised we cannot accurately predict outcome, suggesting other unidentified determinants. The discovery of further risk factors would allow new insights into the underlying mechanism, and open up future avenues of investigation and potential interventions.
Thus far, little work has been performed looking into the impact of genomics on cognitive outcome after critical care. There are an estimated 20,000 protein coding genes in the human genome. Such large numbers of whole exome sequence variables necessitate using either an extremely large population or testing a small number of candidate genes. Critical Care research is hampered by small population sizes, ruling out whole genome analysis. The ideal candidate gene would be a known modulator of neuroinflammation, synthesised in the central nervous system (or able to traverse the blood-brain barrier) and have a known association with cognitive impairment. In terms of feasibility it should have relatively high incidence allele proportions, and be modifiable for in order to test any association for causality.
The most common gene associated with cognitive impairment is APOE, which codes for apolipoprotein E (ApoE). There are three common alleles of the APOE gene: APOE-∈2, APOE-∈3 and APOE-∈4. Possession of an APOE-∈4 allele increases the risk of developing late-onset Alzheimer's Disease. ApoE demonstrates immunomodulatory properties both systemically and in the central nervous system. It is secreted by astrocytes and oligodendrocytes after brain injury and is implicated in the cholesterol distribution necessary for membrane growth after axonal injury. ApoE-deficient murine glial cultures express more nitric oxide (NO) and Tissue Necrosis Factor α (TNFα) after simulated injury (LPS / closed head injury) than wild-type cells. Incubating the deficient glial cultures in recombinant apoE suppresses the TNF-α expression. This suppression occurred to a much greater extent with recombinant apoE-∈3 and apoE-∈2 than with apoE-∈4. Finally, microglia treated with secreted amyloid precursor protein α (sAPP-α, a secreted derivative of β amyloid precursor protein (β-APP)) will produce higher levels of activation markers and enhance the production of neurotoxins. This effect can be blocked by prior incubation apoE3, but not with apoE4. Administration of peripheral ApoE mimetic peptide (a truncated protein able to traverse the blood brain barrier) suppresses systemic and brain Il-6 and TNFα levels. Lastly, ApoE isoforms also have different affects on cholinergic neuron destruction, through increased synthesis and reduced elimination of amyloid beta.
Critical care patients typically experience systemic inflammation secondary to sepsis, surgery or trauma, or a combination of the three. Central nervous system (CNS) ApoE mRNA expression is upregulated in wild-type mice exposed to repeated restraint stress. As such, it is possible that APOE genotype may influence cognitive outcome through mediation of the neuroinflammatory response. The APOE-∈4 allele is known to increase the risk of POD after surgery and to increase the duration of delirium in the intensive care unit (ITU). The presence and duration of post-operative delirium (POD) are recognised predictors of long-term cognitive impairment (LTCI). Neither the incidence of delirium nor LTCI according to APOE genotype have been investigated in critical care patients.
More recently, burns intensive care (BICU) survivors have also been shown to develop LTCI following discharge with an associated reduction in quality of life.
The incidence of cognitive impairment amongst severe burns patients is comparable to ARDS cohorts, but in a younger and less comorbid group. Patients with severe burns develop large magnitude systemic inflammatory reactions secondary to their injury. This is perpetuated by multiple surgeries and a high incidence of nosocomial infections. This cohort provides a unique group of relatively young individuals with comparable injuries and minimal pre-morbid comorbidity or cognitive impairment. As such, they represent a less varied population than general adult ITUs. It is also unusual to find evidence of AD, vascular dementia or Parkinson's dementia in younger age brackets. This reduces the confounding factors that typically impede critical care clinical research and any association between APOE-∈4 and ITU LTCI may therefore infer a common pathological process.
We hypothesise that severe burn patients who possess an APOE ε4 allele are more susceptible to long term cognitive impairment following their injuries, and that this will impact significantly on their quality of life.
With this study we aim to: assess neurocognitive function following a severe burn; more specifically processing speed, executive function, working memory, immediate recall and delayed recall; assess our sample population APOE genotype; and investigate the association between APOE genotype and cognitive function.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Participants possessing APOE-ε4
Young adults who have suffered a severe burn injury necessitating intensive care admission 5 to 10 years previously, who possess at least one copy of the APOE-ε4 allele.
APOE genotyping
APOE genotyping and broad cognitive assessment expressed as a median T-score of the following tests (with cognitive domains assessed in brackets) Trail Making Part A (processing speed), Trail Making Part B (executive function), One Back test (working memory), List Learning Task (Immediate recall, visual learning, delayed recall and recognition discrimination).
Participants not possessing APOE-ε4
Young adults who have suffered a severe burn injury necessitating intensive care admission 5 to 10 years previously, who do not possess a copy of the APOE-ε4 allele.
APOE genotyping
APOE genotyping and broad cognitive assessment expressed as a median T-score of the following tests (with cognitive domains assessed in brackets) Trail Making Part A (processing speed), Trail Making Part B (executive function), One Back test (working memory), List Learning Task (Immediate recall, visual learning, delayed recall and recognition discrimination).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
APOE genotyping
APOE genotyping and broad cognitive assessment expressed as a median T-score of the following tests (with cognitive domains assessed in brackets) Trail Making Part A (processing speed), Trail Making Part B (executive function), One Back test (working memory), List Learning Task (Immediate recall, visual learning, delayed recall and recognition discrimination).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Burn injury \>15% total body surface area
* Admission to a Burns Intensive Care Unit between Jan 2007- Jan 2012
* Intubated and ventilated during the admission
Exclusion Criteria
* Head trauma
* Currently held under the 2007 Mental Health Act (UK) or Section 5150 of the California Welfare and Institutions Code (USA).
* Currently receiving formal psychiatric treatment (including involvement in a Personality Disorder Unit, being under voluntary section, current re-occurrence of chronic self-harm)
* Current imprisonment
* Current substance abuse (within two weeks of assessment)
* Patients unable to understand plain verbal and written English.
18 Years
25 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marcela P. Vizcaychipi
Principle Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marcela P Vizcaychipi, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
C&W17/059
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.