Duration of Analgesia With Dexmedetomidine and Ropivacaine in Brachial Plexus Block

NCT ID: NCT03385967

Last Updated: 2019-05-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-04-30

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective, randomized, double blind study of adding dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine for Brachial plexus block and assessing the analgesia with VAS pain scales(0-10), Satisfaction scale by VAS scale(0-10) and time to first analgesic consumption. This study mainly aims to investigate whether addition of dexmedetomidine helps in increasing the duration of analgesia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In our institute ropivacaine is used for all the peripheral nerve blocks. This a prospective, randomized, double blind clinical trial study comparing the addition of dexmedetomidine vs ropivacaine alone in brachial plexus nerve block. After screening the patient with the inclusion criteria, an informed consent is obtained from the patient by one of the co-investigator.

Adjuvants to local anesthetics are commonly added to prolong the duration of the peripheral nerve block. Sometimes patients have other added comorbidities along with high BMI with history of chronic pain where prolonging the duration of the peripheral nerve block would help with decreased narcotic consumption in the perioperative period with minimal side effects related to the local anesthetics(LA) as well as the adjuncts.

Dexmedetomidine is proven to be better than Clonidine in a recent study. Also perineural dexmedetomidine is proven to be more efficacious compared to intravenous dosing. The investigators are evaluating whether adding dexmedetomidine to standard dose of Ropivacaine helps in prolonging the duration of the peripheral nerve block with minimal side effects.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Analgesia Pain, Acute Peripheral Nerve Block

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a prospective, randomized, double blind study of adding dexmedetomidine 0.25mcg/kg body weight to standard dose (25ml) of 0.5%ropivacaine for Brachial plexus block and assessing the analgesia with VAS pain scales (0-10), Satisfaction scale by VAS scale (0-10) and time to first analgesic consumption.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers
Double Blind

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ropivacaine only

0.5% ropivacaine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard of care 0.5%ropivacaine

ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine

25ml of 0.5%ropivacaine with 0.25mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Addition of Dexmedetomidine in block .25mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine

ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard of care 0.5%ropivacaine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexmedetomidine

Addition of Dexmedetomidine in block .25mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

ropivacaine

Standard of care 0.5%ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

precedex naropin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age-18years and above
* Both male and female patients
* BMI-\>18
* Elective Subacute upper extremity fractures

Exclusion Criteria

* Chronic pain patients (Pain persisting for more than 3-6months or past the normal healing time of any injury, influences every aspect of a person's quality of life.)
* Patients with drug abuse history in the past 6 months
* ESRD
* Hepatic failure
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alberto Ardon, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB201702926

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dexmedetomidine in Postoperative Analgesia
NCT05705128 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE2/PHASE3
Dexmedetomidine in IVRA
NCT05123170 COMPLETED PHASE4