Analgesic Efficacy of Paravertebral Morphine

NCT ID: NCT03379987

Last Updated: 2019-02-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-01

Study Completion Date

2019-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigator will test the analgesic efficacy of paravertebral morphine as an adjuvant to local anesthetics for acute postoperative pain following breast surgery and renal surgery

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PVB morphine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PVB morphine

Intervention Type DRUG

The PVB was performed under ultrasonographic guidance in the sitting position. Surgical disinfection of thoracoabdominal paravertebral area was done. A linear high-frequency transducer (10-12 MHz, Sonosite, Bothell, WA, USA) was used. The scanning process (Longitudinal out-of-plane technique) was started at 5-10 cm lateral to the spinous process of thoracic vertebrae to identify the rounded ribs and parietal pleura underneath. The transducer is then moved progressively more medially until the transverse processes are identified as more squared structure deeper to the ribs. A 100 mm needle was inserted out-of-plane to contact the transverse process of thoracic vertebra and then, walked off above the transverse process 1-1.5 cm deeper searching for loss of resistance injecting 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine + 3 mg morphine for group PVB morphine in incremental doses of 3 ml.

PVB bupivacaine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PVB bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

the same steps mentioned in group PVB morphine but the solution used for paravertebral block contain bupivacaine only 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine injected in in incremental doses of 3 ml.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PVB morphine

The PVB was performed under ultrasonographic guidance in the sitting position. Surgical disinfection of thoracoabdominal paravertebral area was done. A linear high-frequency transducer (10-12 MHz, Sonosite, Bothell, WA, USA) was used. The scanning process (Longitudinal out-of-plane technique) was started at 5-10 cm lateral to the spinous process of thoracic vertebrae to identify the rounded ribs and parietal pleura underneath. The transducer is then moved progressively more medially until the transverse processes are identified as more squared structure deeper to the ribs. A 100 mm needle was inserted out-of-plane to contact the transverse process of thoracic vertebra and then, walked off above the transverse process 1-1.5 cm deeper searching for loss of resistance injecting 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine + 3 mg morphine for group PVB morphine in incremental doses of 3 ml.

Intervention Type DRUG

PVB bupivacaine

the same steps mentioned in group PVB morphine but the solution used for paravertebral block contain bupivacaine only 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine injected in in incremental doses of 3 ml.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients subjected to mastectomy or renal surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients complaining of coagulopathies
* Patients with vertebral anomalies
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Diab Fuad Hetta

anesthesia and pain management departmewnt, SECI

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Diab

Asyut, Assuit, Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Diab Hetta, MD

Role: primary

+201091090009

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SECI-IRB-IORG0006563-404

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.