Physiopathology of Lower Cortical Activation in COPD Patients: Contribution of Cortical Neuromodulation

NCT ID: NCT03368703

Last Updated: 2020-01-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-01

Study Completion Date

2018-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with COPD have lower cortical activation and higher cortical inhibitory levels. The purpose of this study is to test the reversibility the lower cortical activation by counterbalancing the increased cortical inhibitory levels with neuro-modulation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients exhibit not only respiratory symptoms but also a peripheral muscular weakness. This weakness is characterized by a loss in strength, harmful for the patients' life quality and vital prognostic. Even if many papers have enlightened damages at a peripheral level, the muscular atrophy itself cannot totally explain the loss in force. Furthermore, the contractile properties of COPD muscles fibres are preserved. Consequently, it seems that the peripheral muscle weakness cannot only be explained by peripheral factors and central structures may be involved.

A recent work showed that during quadriceps voluntary contraction, cortical activation in COPD patients was significantly lower than in healthy subjects, contributing in the loss in strength. However, the pathophysiology underlying this loss of strength is still unclear and two hypotheses can be advanced: 1) the influence of anatomical lesions in the brain of COPD patients and 2) the particular metabolism of this population. Indeed, COPD patients show a reduced oxidative activity and an increased glycolytic contribution (decreased type I fibres and increased type II fibres, increased glycolytic enzymes activity, increased metabolites production). This specific metabolic may lead to an over-activation of type III-IV afferents, projecting onto somatosensory cortex sensitive to metabolites at a peripheral level, and produce inhibitory activity on the primary motor cortex, seat of the motor control. What is reported in the literature so far, is that COPD patients display increased cortical inhibitory values than healthy subjects.

Therefore, beyond understanding better the nervous mechanisms involved in the COPD's peripheral muscle weakness, the aim of this study is to counterbalance this increased cortical inhibitory level.

We hypothesize that modulating inhibitory processes at a cortical level would induced a reduction of inhibitions in patients with COPD and an increase in the force produced. In case this hypothesis would be verified, we will be able to confirm that this increased cortical level in COPD patients is reversible and may be a target for rehabilitation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Physiology

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

COPD patients

COPD patients group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Anodal transcranial direct-current-stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

2mA / 20min Anodal and Sham tDCS over dominant M1. Anodal tDCS consists of 30s of ramp up followed by 20min of stimulation and 30s of ramp down.

Sham transcranial direct-current-stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham tDCS consists of only 30s of ramp up followed by 30s of ramp down and no further stimulation.

Participants therefore have the same feeling for both modalities : slight itching due to the induced current at the beginning of the protocol (during around 30s) allowing no differentiation by the participant between the anodal or sham sessions.

Healthy subjects

Healthy subject group, matched with COPD patients group on age, weight and BMI

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Anodal transcranial direct-current-stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

2mA / 20min Anodal and Sham tDCS over dominant M1. Anodal tDCS consists of 30s of ramp up followed by 20min of stimulation and 30s of ramp down.

Sham transcranial direct-current-stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham tDCS consists of only 30s of ramp up followed by 30s of ramp down and no further stimulation.

Participants therefore have the same feeling for both modalities : slight itching due to the induced current at the beginning of the protocol (during around 30s) allowing no differentiation by the participant between the anodal or sham sessions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Anodal transcranial direct-current-stimulation

2mA / 20min Anodal and Sham tDCS over dominant M1. Anodal tDCS consists of 30s of ramp up followed by 20min of stimulation and 30s of ramp down.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham transcranial direct-current-stimulation

Sham tDCS consists of only 30s of ramp up followed by 30s of ramp down and no further stimulation.

Participants therefore have the same feeling for both modalities : slight itching due to the induced current at the beginning of the protocol (during around 30s) allowing no differentiation by the participant between the anodal or sham sessions.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Health insurance
* Patients : COPD Gold II-IV
* Patients : No rehabilitation since at least 1 yrs
* Control : sedentary (\< 9 Voorips)

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women
* Seizures
* Unable to give written consent
* Metalic object above shoulders
* Dermatological issue concerning surface electrodes
* Drugs influencing central nervous system
* Caffeine consumption \> 4 coffee / day
* Neurological disorders
* Patients : recent exacerbation (\< 4 weeks)
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

5 Santé

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Philippe Guerin, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

5 Santé

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cliniques du Souffle

Lodève, Herault, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5S_EXCCOM

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.