Biomarkers to Guide Directional DBS for Parkinson's Disease

NCT ID: NCT03353688

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

31 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-11-03

Study Completion Date

2024-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical efficacy of directional DBS electrode technology and whether electrophysiology biomarkers can predict effective contact segments for chronic therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) can be remarkable for treating symptoms of Parkinson's disease, improvement varies across clinical trials, individual patients, and over time. A major limitation to the advancement of DBS therapy is that there are no established biomarkers to tailor stimulator settings in individuals. Emerging segmented ("directional") lead technology allows current steering, a new opportunity to improve tolerability and efficacy by shaping the DBS electrical field. This novel lead design has 8 contacts rather than the 4 available with currently available leads. How do the investigators optimally adjust stimulation parameters when there are far more potentially useful settings than can be practically evaluated in clinic? How do the investigators know that DBS settings in a given patient are optimal or appropriate? The investigators have pioneered minimally invasive, rapidly acquired biomarkers to solve these important problems. Using electrocorticography, electroencephalography, and subcortical local field potentials, the investigators will measure whether resting or stimulus-evoked electrophysiology can serve as a predictive biomarker to guide activation and adjustment of a directional DBS system. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind crossover study is to measure the clinical efficacy of directional versus omnidirectional stimulation and to explore whether electrophysiology biomarkers can rapidly predict effective, well-tolerated contacts for directional DBS therapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Parkinson Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

This is a triple blind, randomized crossover study of directional versus omnidirectional unilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
This is a triple blind study. Participants, raters, and investigator are masked to the assignment of directional versus omnidirectional unilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation guided by behavioral programming for Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations. For the nested exploratory arm evaluating directional DBS guided by electrophysiology biomarkers, the study is double-blind (investigator is not blinded).

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Directional DBS guided by behavior

Directional stimulation with the Boston Scientific Vercise PC IPG with directional DBS lead, guided by behavioral assessments during device activation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Boston Scientific Vercise PC IPG with directional DBS lead

Intervention Type DEVICE

Deep brain stimulation

Omnidirectional DBS guided by behavior

Omnidirectional ("ring mode") stimulation with the Boston Scientific Vercise PC IPG with directional DBS lead, guided by behavioral assessments during device activation.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Boston Scientific Vercise PC IPG with directional DBS lead

Intervention Type DEVICE

Deep brain stimulation

Directional DBS guided by biomarkers

Directional unilateral subthalamic stimulation with the Boston Scientific Vercise PC IPG with directional DBS lead, guided by electrophysiology biomarkers measured during surgery (nested exploratory treatment arm).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Boston Scientific Vercise PC IPG with directional DBS lead

Intervention Type DEVICE

Deep brain stimulation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Boston Scientific Vercise PC IPG with directional DBS lead

Deep brain stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥18 years and ≤70 years.
2. Clinically definite, advanced idiopathic PD based on at least 2 of 3 cardinal PD features (tremor, rigidity, or bradykinesia).
3. Disease duration of 4 years or more.
4. Participant has elected to undergo DBS surgery as part of routine care, and the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is recommended as the surgical target.
5. Participant agrees to not undergo contralateral DBS for the other side of the brain until ≥ 12 months after initial DBS surgery.
6. Participant is healthy enough to undergo surgery and the research protocol.
7. Normal, or essentially normal, preoperative brain MRI.
8. Willingness and ability to cooperate during awake DBS surgery, as well as during post-operative evaluations, adjustments of medications and stimulator settings.
9. Participant's health insurance and/or Medicare covers DBS surgery as part of routine care.
10. Refractory motor symptoms such as tremor, dyskinesias, wearing off, and/or motor fluctuations, causing significant disability or occupational dysfunction, despite reasonable attempts at medical management, as determined by our consensus DBS committee.
11. Stable doses of PD medications for at least 28 days prior to baseline assessments.
12. Improvement of motor signs ≥30% with dopaminergic medication as assessed with the use of the Movement Disorders - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, part III (MDS-UPDRS III; scores range from 0 to 108, with higher scores indicating worse functioning).
13. Disease severity ratings above Hoehn and Yahr stage 1, defined as unilateral involvement only with minimal or no functional disability, with scores ranging from 0 to 5 and higher scores indicating more severe disease.
14. Score of more than 6 for activities of daily living in the worst "off" medication condition despite medical treatment, as assessed with the use of the MDS-UPDRS II (scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating worse functioning), or mild-to-moderate impairment in social and occupational functioning (score of 51 to 80% on the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale with scores ranging from 1 to 100 and lower scores indicating worse functioning).
15. Dementia Rating Scale-2 (DRS-2) score of ≥130 on medications.
16. Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) score of ≤25 on medications.
17. Participant expresses understanding of the consent process, terms of the study protocol, is available for follow-up over the length of the study, and signs informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age \<18 years or \>70 years.
2. Participant's insurance will not cover the costs of surgery with the investigational device.
3. Medical contraindications such as current uncontrolled hypertension, heart disease, coagulopathy, or other conditions contraindicating DBS surgery or stimulation.
4. Duration of disease of \<4 years
5. Participant or care team determine that contralateral DBS for the other side of the brain will likely be clinically indicated \<12 months after initial DBS surgery.
6. Diagnosis or suspicion of atypical parkinsonism (progressive supranuclear palsy, multiple system atrophy, corticobasal syndrome) or drug-induced parkinsonism, or significant neurological disease other than Parkinson's disease.
7. Disease severity ratings of Hoehn and Yahr stage 1, defined as unilateral involvement only with minimal or no functional disability, with scores ranging from 0 to 5 and higher scores indicating more severe disease.
8. Diagnosis of psychogenic movement disorder based on consensus criteria.
9. Score of \>25 on the Beck Depression Inventory II, with scores ranging from 0 to 63 and higher scores indicating worse functioning), or history of suicide attempt.
10. Any current acute psychosis, alcohol abuse or drug abuse.
11. Clinical dementia (score of ≤130 on the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale with scores ranging from 0 to 144 and higher scores indicating better functioning).
12. Ongoing or pervasive impulse control disorder not resolved by reduction of dopaminergic medications.
13. Use of anticoagulant medications that cannot be discontinued during perioperative period.
14. History of hemorrhagic stroke.
15. Current or future risk of immunocompromise that might significantly increase risk of infection.
16. History of recurrent of unprovoked seizures.
17. Lack of clear levodopa responsiveness.
18. Any medical condition requiring repeated MRI.
19. The presence of an implanted device (e.g., cochlear implant, pacemaker, neurostimulators), whether turned on or off.
20. Prior DBS surgery or ablation within the affected basal ganglion.
21. A condition requiring or likely to require the use of diathermy.
22. Structural lesions such as basal ganglionic stroke, tumor or vascular malformation as etiology of the movement disorder.
23. Any medical or psychological problem that would interfere with the conduction of the study protocol
24. A female who is breastfeeding or of child-bearing potential with a positive urine pregnancy test or not using adequate contraception.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Alabama at Birmingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Harrison Walker, MD

Professor of Neurology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Harrison Walker, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Black SD, Del Bene VA, Celka AS, Guthrie B, Martin RC, Olson J, Shumake J, Walker HC. Nascent visual artistic expression following right hemisphere subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2022 Jun;99:47-50. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.04.020. Epub 2022 May 1. No abstract available.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35598419 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1UH3NS100553-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

IRB-161018001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.