Feasibility Study for Neurodevelopment Follow-up Study in PICU
NCT ID: NCT03345628
Last Updated: 2020-02-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-02-01
2021-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pilot Study for Sedation Interruption in Children
NCT02426320
Implementation and Evaluation of a Pediatric Nurse-driven Sedation Protocol in a PICU
NCT02829710
Retrospective Study on Prolonged Sedation Effects With Inhaled Agents in PICU
NCT05064592
Corticosteroids Before Extubation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
NCT06722118
Sedation Management in Pediatric Patients Supported on Mechanical Ventilation
NCT00142766
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is essential that Pediatric Intensivists start investigating the effect of our commonly used sedation protocols, which frequently include benzodiazepines, on our patients' neurodevelopment. The standard sedative regimen in use for many years at Montreal Children's PICU is midazolam infusion (benzodiazepine) plus opioid (commonly fentanyl or morphine) infusion. Other agents including ketamine may be added. This is not an easy field of study since we cannot randomize patients to receive sedation or not.
Therefore this programme of research aims to:
a) Identify a suitable group of PICU patients who were exposed to PICU sedation, along with a comparable group who were not exposed to sedation during their PICU admission who will act as controls; b) Assess the feasibility of recruiting these retrospectively identified patients and performing the requisite neurodevelopmental assessments around 6 years after PICU admission; c) Expand to a multicentre study, if feasibility is confirmed, to allow the recruitment of sufficient numbers of cases to determine if PICU sedation has a significant effect on long-term neurodevelopment; d) Investigate alternative sedation protocols and/or interventions to minimize the adverse effects on development.
1. The initial aim of this study programme has been achieved by means of a Chart Review completed in March 2017. We hypothesized that previously healthy infants requiring ventilation for an acute respiratory illness would divide into two groups depending on their respiratory management: intubation with sedation versus non-invasive ventilation without sedation, and that these infants, with a unifying pathological diagnosis, could act as cases and controls for an investigation of PICU sedation. In order to optimize the validity of our comparison, patients must be as similar as possible, therefore many exclusion criteria and also matching are required. The chart review has determined that the two described groups are similar in terms of severity of illness scores (Pediatric Risk of Mortality \[PRISM\] and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction \[PELOD\]) therefore making them suitable subjects for a follow-up study (23). This phase of the programme has been presented and discussed at Canadian Critical Care Trials Group (CCCTG) meetings and endorsed by CCCTG.
2. Having identified an appropriate group of patients, the next phase of the research programme is to perform a feasibility study to determine if our methodology will lead to adequate recruitment to move forward to a large multicentre study. This is the subject of this protocol.
The proposed methodology is similar to that used successfully in the PANDA study (16) where study participants were identified using billing records (hernia surgery at up to 36 months of age). Their records were checked for exclusion criteria based on age, gestational age at birth and general health. Parents were contacted and invited to participate. Further exclusions were based on more detailed medical history from the parents and the existence of a sibling within 3 years of the index child's age who had not had any anesthetic exposure and who was also healthy. Another general anesthesia study with similar methodology is currently analysing data (24). This group from the Mayo Clinic used population-based controls for anesthesia-exposed index cases identified from a previous cohort study (10). Our participant identification will also be retrospective, from medical records to identify sedation-exposed and non-exposed subjects from within the PICU population as described below.
Hypothesis: feasibility study Patients identified from the PICU admission records and Medical Records search can be suc-cessfully recruited and assessed by standard Neurodevelopmental testing 6 years after their admission.
Hypothesis: definitive study We hypothesize that benzodiazepines alone or with opioid infusion during mechanical ventilation of previously healthy infants with respiratory diagnoses would decrease Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence III (WPPSI III) score at 6 yrs, compared to infants who were treated with non-invasive ventilation without sedation.
Aims for feasibility study
1. Identify patients from PICU database and from previous Chart Review Database (see below).
2. Recruit 20 patients each from the sedated/intubated/ventilated and non-sedated/non-invasive ventilation groups (total 40).
3. Perform pediatric and neurodevelopmental assessments on patients at 5 years 8 months to 7 years 4 months of age using a battery of tests with Wechsler Pediatric and Primary Infant scales of Development (IV) as the primary outcome.
Primary outcome Successful identification and recruitment of patients and performance of testing.
Secondary outcomes Performance of Wechsler Pediatric and Primary Infant scales of Development IV (WPPSI IV) and NEPSY-II™ tests at 5 years 8 months to 7 years 4 months .
Completion of Childhood Memory Score (CMS™) and Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL)™ questionnaires Pediatric examination: incidence of neurological abnormalities including cerebral palsy, hearing or visual deficits, seizure disorder, Attention Deficit disorder, Autism spectrum disorder.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
sedated
infants requiring intubation and ventilation who received sedatives for at least 3 days
Sedatives
sedated group received sedative drugs to tolerated intubation and ventilation
non-sedated
infants who received respiratory support by non-invasive ventilation and were not sedated
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sedatives
sedated group received sedative drugs to tolerated intubation and ventilation
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* logistical exclusions: language other than English or French for which testing tools are available; geographical distance precluding return for testing appointment.
52 Weeks
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Justine's Hospital
OTHER
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Davinia Withington
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
McGill University Health Center
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PICU FUN 2018-3310
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.