Feasibility Study for Neurodevelopment Follow-up Study in PICU

NCT ID: NCT03345628

Last Updated: 2020-02-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There is a large and growing body of animal evidence demonstrating neuroapoptosis and neurodevelopmental abnormalities after exposure to anesthetic agents. This has prompted an FDA warning concerning use of anesthetics and sedatives in children under 3 years of age. There has been very little investigation of the neurodevelopment effects of prolonged sedation in previously healthy infants in Paediatric Intensive Care. This feasibility study will recruit previously healthy infants who required respiratory support with or without sedation at up to 1 year of age and assess neurodevelopmental outcomes at 6 years of age.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The majority of human cohort investigations of neurotoxicity have studied general anesthesia for surgery. However, many animal studies have involved exposure to agents for significantly longer than the average duration of a general anesthetic in infants, some even for 24 hours (8).This is closer in exposure characteristics to prolonged sedation in PICU: days as compared to a few hours. However, although sedation in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) may continue for several days, there are no studies of its effects on subsequent neurodevelopment in previously healthy young infants. The only intensive care studies thus far have examined high risk subgroups, including the EPIPAGE study (20) in premature newborns and studies of infants after congenital heart surgery. The latter studies have shown a small but significant association between cumulative benzodiazepine dose and Visual-Motor integration at 4 years of age (21), and an association between higher exposure to volatile anesthetic agents and lower cognitive scores on the Bailey Scales of Infant Development III at 12 months (22), respectively.

It is essential that Pediatric Intensivists start investigating the effect of our commonly used sedation protocols, which frequently include benzodiazepines, on our patients' neurodevelopment. The standard sedative regimen in use for many years at Montreal Children's PICU is midazolam infusion (benzodiazepine) plus opioid (commonly fentanyl or morphine) infusion. Other agents including ketamine may be added. This is not an easy field of study since we cannot randomize patients to receive sedation or not.

Therefore this programme of research aims to:

a) Identify a suitable group of PICU patients who were exposed to PICU sedation, along with a comparable group who were not exposed to sedation during their PICU admission who will act as controls; b) Assess the feasibility of recruiting these retrospectively identified patients and performing the requisite neurodevelopmental assessments around 6 years after PICU admission; c) Expand to a multicentre study, if feasibility is confirmed, to allow the recruitment of sufficient numbers of cases to determine if PICU sedation has a significant effect on long-term neurodevelopment; d) Investigate alternative sedation protocols and/or interventions to minimize the adverse effects on development.

1. The initial aim of this study programme has been achieved by means of a Chart Review completed in March 2017. We hypothesized that previously healthy infants requiring ventilation for an acute respiratory illness would divide into two groups depending on their respiratory management: intubation with sedation versus non-invasive ventilation without sedation, and that these infants, with a unifying pathological diagnosis, could act as cases and controls for an investigation of PICU sedation. In order to optimize the validity of our comparison, patients must be as similar as possible, therefore many exclusion criteria and also matching are required. The chart review has determined that the two described groups are similar in terms of severity of illness scores (Pediatric Risk of Mortality \[PRISM\] and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction \[PELOD\]) therefore making them suitable subjects for a follow-up study (23). This phase of the programme has been presented and discussed at Canadian Critical Care Trials Group (CCCTG) meetings and endorsed by CCCTG.
2. Having identified an appropriate group of patients, the next phase of the research programme is to perform a feasibility study to determine if our methodology will lead to adequate recruitment to move forward to a large multicentre study. This is the subject of this protocol.

The proposed methodology is similar to that used successfully in the PANDA study (16) where study participants were identified using billing records (hernia surgery at up to 36 months of age). Their records were checked for exclusion criteria based on age, gestational age at birth and general health. Parents were contacted and invited to participate. Further exclusions were based on more detailed medical history from the parents and the existence of a sibling within 3 years of the index child's age who had not had any anesthetic exposure and who was also healthy. Another general anesthesia study with similar methodology is currently analysing data (24). This group from the Mayo Clinic used population-based controls for anesthesia-exposed index cases identified from a previous cohort study (10). Our participant identification will also be retrospective, from medical records to identify sedation-exposed and non-exposed subjects from within the PICU population as described below.

Hypothesis: feasibility study Patients identified from the PICU admission records and Medical Records search can be suc-cessfully recruited and assessed by standard Neurodevelopmental testing 6 years after their admission.

Hypothesis: definitive study We hypothesize that benzodiazepines alone or with opioid infusion during mechanical ventilation of previously healthy infants with respiratory diagnoses would decrease Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence III (WPPSI III) score at 6 yrs, compared to infants who were treated with non-invasive ventilation without sedation.

Aims for feasibility study

1. Identify patients from PICU database and from previous Chart Review Database (see below).
2. Recruit 20 patients each from the sedated/intubated/ventilated and non-sedated/non-invasive ventilation groups (total 40).
3. Perform pediatric and neurodevelopmental assessments on patients at 5 years 8 months to 7 years 4 months of age using a battery of tests with Wechsler Pediatric and Primary Infant scales of Development (IV) as the primary outcome.

Primary outcome Successful identification and recruitment of patients and performance of testing.

Secondary outcomes Performance of Wechsler Pediatric and Primary Infant scales of Development IV (WPPSI IV) and NEPSY-II™ tests at 5 years 8 months to 7 years 4 months .

Completion of Childhood Memory Score (CMS™) and Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL)™ questionnaires Pediatric examination: incidence of neurological abnormalities including cerebral palsy, hearing or visual deficits, seizure disorder, Attention Deficit disorder, Autism spectrum disorder.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bronchiolitis Acute Pneumonia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

sedated

infants requiring intubation and ventilation who received sedatives for at least 3 days

Sedatives

Intervention Type DRUG

sedated group received sedative drugs to tolerated intubation and ventilation

non-sedated

infants who received respiratory support by non-invasive ventilation and were not sedated

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sedatives

sedated group received sedative drugs to tolerated intubation and ventilation

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

sedation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* infants treated for bronchiolitis or pneumonia requiring respiratory support either intubation and IPPV needing sedation OR requiring non-invasive ventilation without sedation

Exclusion Criteria

* prematurity less than 28 weeks, congenital heart disease, genetic or chromosomal anomalies, neurological disease, exposure to anesthesia in utero or prior to PICU admission, GA longer than 60 minutes or repeated PICU sedation since original admission.
* logistical exclusions: language other than English or French for which testing tools are available; geographical distance precluding return for testing appointment.
Maximum Eligible Age

52 Weeks

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St. Justine's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Davinia Withington

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

McGill University Health Center

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PICU FUN 2018-3310

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PICU Patient Diary
NCT03777527 UNKNOWN
LongVentKids Study
NCT04112459 UNKNOWN