Patient Satisfaction After Root Coverage Using VISTA Technique Compared to MCAF Technique With PRF.

NCT ID: NCT03328442

Last Updated: 2018-01-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-31

Study Completion Date

2020-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

VISTA technique with PRF compared to MCAF technique with PRF to treat gingival recession

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Comparison between two techniques for root coverage divided in two groups the first (test group) VISTA technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane and the second (control group)MCAF technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane for treating Miller's class I and II gingival recession defects.

Clinical Periodontal Records will be taken at baseline, 3 months and 6 months respectively.

Visual analogue scale for pain during one week after operation. Patient satisfaction record using questionnaire after 6 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gingival Recession

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Vista technique

The vista technique with PRF membrane uses a Vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access in combination with Platelet rich fibrin membrane to treat gingival recession defects.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

VISTA Technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

VISTA with PRF membrane includes Treatment of recession class I and II using autologous PRF membrane

modified coronally advanced flap

A modified coronally advanced flap utilising Platelet rich fibrin membrane to treat gingival recession defects.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

modified coronally advanced flap

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

modified coronally advanced flap with PRF membrane for Treatment of recession class I and II

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

VISTA Technique

VISTA with PRF membrane includes Treatment of recession class I and II using autologous PRF membrane

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

modified coronally advanced flap

modified coronally advanced flap with PRF membrane for Treatment of recession class I and II

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access MCAF

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Age (18-55) Miller's classI and II multiple GR width of KG\>2 mm

Exclusion Criteria

* Systemic diseases Poor oral hygiene Smoking Patient allergy Miller's class III and IV
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed Salah salaheldin

Assistant lecturer faculty of dentistry Nahda university

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Azza Ezzelarab, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cairo University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mohamed S Saleh, Master

Role: CONTACT

01001628350

Hani M Elnahass, PhD

Role: CONTACT

01000252603

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zadeh HH. Minimally invasive treatment of maxillary anterior gingival recession defects by vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access and platelet-derived growth factor BB. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):653-60.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22140667 (View on PubMed)

Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M. Treatment of multiple recession-type defects in patients with esthetic demands. J Periodontol. 2000 Sep;71(9):1506-14. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.9.1506.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11022782 (View on PubMed)

Zuhr O, Rebele SF, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hurzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient-centred outcomes. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jun;41(6):582-92. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12178. Epub 2013 Nov 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24117676 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEBD-CU-2017-10-30

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effect of I-PRF After Gingivectomy
NCT07174934 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA