A Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of NT-501 in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2 - Protocol B

NCT ID: NCT03319849

Last Updated: 2024-09-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

119 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-22

Study Completion Date

2022-09-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a phase 3, randomized, multi-center study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the NT-501 implants in participants with macular telangiectasia type 2.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Phase 3, prospective, multicenter, masked, sham-controlled study with the overall study objective to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NT-501 for the treatment of MacTel. Secondary objective was to evaluate the safety of NT-501 in participants with MacTel. This was a multicenter study conducted at 20 study centers in the United States, Australia, Germany, and the United Kingdom.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Macular Telangiectasia Type 2

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

After confirming eligibility in conjunction with the reading center, the study eye of each subject was randomized (1:1) to either have NT-501 implanted or to undergo the sham procedure.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
The subjects and all personnel at the image reading center remained masked to the treatment assignment throughout the study. In addition, the refractionist, VA examiner, and photographers/imagers were masked to treatment assignment (NT-501 implantation or sham procedure) at all follow-up visits. The ophthalmologist, surgeon, and clinic coordinator were instructed not to discuss the assigned treatment with the subject.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NT-501

Test product

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NT-501

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Each NT-501 implant consisted of hCNTF-secreting NTC-201-6A.02 cells encapsulated within supportive matrices and surrounded by a semipermeable polymer membrane.

The NTC-201-6A cells continuously secrete CNTF from the NT-501 implant into the vitreous cavity. Implanted by a qualified Health Care Professional.

Sham

A sham surgical procedure was performed to mimic the implant procedure; there was no comparator product.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The sham surgery involved a superficial conjunctival incision performed under local anesthetic and closure with a single suture.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

NT-501

Each NT-501 implant consisted of hCNTF-secreting NTC-201-6A.02 cells encapsulated within supportive matrices and surrounded by a semipermeable polymer membrane.

The NTC-201-6A cells continuously secrete CNTF from the NT-501 implant into the vitreous cavity. Implanted by a qualified Health Care Professional.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Sham

The sham surgery involved a superficial conjunctival incision performed under local anesthetic and closure with a single suture.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Participant must have at least one study eye with a positive diagnosis of MacTel with evidence of fluorescein leakage typical of MacTel and at least one of the other features that include hyperpigmentation that is outside of a 500 micron radius from the center of the fovea, retinal opacification, crystalline deposits, right-angle vessels, or inner/outer lamellar cavities
2. Participant must have an Inner Segment - Outer Segment Junction Line (IS/OS) Photo Receptor (PR) break in the study eye(s) and en face EZ (area of IS/OS loss) as measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) between 0.16 mm\^2 and 2.00 mm\^2
3. Participant's best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) is a 54-letter score or better (20/80 or better) as measured by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at screening.
4. Participant must have steady fixation in the foveal or parafoveal area and sufficiently clear media for good quality photographs
5. Participant must be greater than 21 years of age or less than 80 years of age at screening
6. Participant must be able to provide written informed consent to participate in the study, in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonisation Good Clinical Practices guidelines, and local regulations, before initiating any study-related procedures
7. Women of childbearing potential must agree to use highly effective contraception (Germany and France only)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Participant is medically unable to comply with study procedures or follow-up visits
2. Participant received intravitreal steroid therapy for non-neovascular MacTel within the last 3 months
3. Participant has ever received intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in the study eye OR has, within the past 3 months, received intravitreal anti-VEGF in the fellow eye at randomization
4. Participant has evidence of ocular disease other than MacTel that, in the judgment of the examining physician, may confound the diagnosis, procedures or outcome of the study (eg, glaucoma, severe nonproliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy, uveitis)
5. Participant has a chronic requirement (eg, ≥ 4 weeks at a time) for ocular medications and/or has a diagnosed disease that, in the judgment of the examining physician, may be vision threatening or may affect the primary outcome (artificial tears are permitted)
6. Participant has evidence of intraretinal neovascularization or subretinal neovascularization (SRNV), as evidenced by hemorrhage, hard exudate, subretinal fluid or intraretinal fluid in either eye
7. Participant has evidence of central serous chorio-retinopathy in either eye
8. Participant has evidence of pathologic myopia in either eye
9. Participant has significant corneal or media opacities in either eye
10. Participant has had a vitrectomy, penetrating keratoplasty, trabeculectomy, or trabeculoplasty
11. Participant has any of the following lens opacities: cortical opacity \> standard 3, posterior subcapsular opacity \> standard 2, or a nuclear opacity \> standard 3 as measured on the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) clinical lens grading system
12. Participant has undergone lens removal in the previous 3 months or YAG laser within 4 weeks
13. Participant was a participant in any other clinical trial of an intervention (drug or device) within the last 6 months
14. Participant is on chemotherapy
15. Participant is pregnant or breastfeeding
16. Participant has a history of malignancy that would compromise the 24-month study survival
17. Participant with a history of ocular herpes virus in either eye
18. Participant has, in the opinion of the investigator, any physical or mental condition that would increase the risk of participation in the study or may interfere with the study procedures, evaluations, and outcome assessments
19. Participant has evidence of intraretinal hyperreflectivity by OCT
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Lowy Medical Research Institute Limited

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Neurotech Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mark Gillies, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Save Sight/Sydney, Australia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Retina Vitreous Assoc

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of Southern Colorado, P.C.

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Emory University Eye Center

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Northwestern Medical Group

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Elman Retina Group, PA

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Ophthalmology Clinical Research Office

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

New England Retina Consultants

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan, Kellogg Eye Center

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

The Retina Institute

Chesterfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Retina Center of New Jersey - Envision Ocular, LLC

Bloomfield, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Flaum Eye - University of Rochester

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Rochester Strong Memorial Hospital

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati Eye Institute

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Tulsa Retina Consultants

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Retina Northwest, PC

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Scheie Eye Institute - University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Palmetto Retina Center

West Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Southeastern Retina Associates, PC

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin Clinical Research, LLC

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Consultants of Texas

Bellaire, Texas, United States

Site Status

Retina Center of Texas

Southlake, Texas, United States

Site Status

Save Sight Institute, Sydney

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Centre for Eye Research Australia Macular Research Unit

East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Klinik at Freiberg, Germany

Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg Germany, Germany

Site Status

University of Bonn

Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

St. Franziskus, Muenster

Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chew EY, Gillies M, Jaffe GJ, Gaudric A, Egan C, Constable I, Clemons T, Aaberg T, Manning DC, Hohman TC, Bird A, Friedlander M; MacTel CNTF NTMT-03 Research investigators. Cell-Based Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor Therapy for Macular Telangiectasia Type 2. NEJM Evid. 2025 Aug;4(8):EVIDoa2400481. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2400481. Epub 2025 Jul 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40693847 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NTMT-03-B

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

iStent Inject New Enrollment Post-Approval Study
NCT04624698 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
INSPIRE Pipeline™ Shield Post Approval Study
NCT05071963 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING