The Procedural Success and Complication Rate of the Left Distal Radial Approach

NCT ID: NCT03292367

Last Updated: 2018-05-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-11

Study Completion Date

2018-02-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Left distal transradial approach (ldTRA) can be an attractive alternative route for left radial and right radial artery. Recently, Ferdinand Kiemeneij reported the feasibility and safety of the use of ldTRA. But, there is few studies focused on this issue. Therefore, the purpose of this prospective observational study is to assess the feasibility and safety of the ldTRA for CAG and PCI.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Femoral artery has been traditionally used as a standard route for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recently, the frequency of use of transradial approach (TRA) is increasing. TRA has several advantages in terms of more comfortable feeling, immediate ambulation, less bleeding complication and decreased mortality rate compared to transfemoral approach (TFA). 2015 ESC guidelines recommend to use of radial artery in order to reduce bleeding complication and mortality. But, most operators tend to prefer right radial approach (RRA) for the access route, because they are usually right-handed and feel more comfortable in the use of right radial artery. Particularly when the patient is obese or the operator's height is short or has a herniated disc on neck or waist, the discomfort may become greater.

In other hand, left radial approach (LRA) have several advantages. Left brachial artery or subclavian artery is less tortuous than right side. The manipulation of catheter is similar with femoral approach. Also, since most patients are right-handed, compression after LRA leads to greater comfort for the patient.

In comparison to the convenience of the patient and procedure, comparative studies on clinical outcomes showed similar results for both RRA and LRA. But LRA may be more at risk for radiation. This is because the operator has to lean more toward the patient for the procedure, which can result in increased radiation exposure.

Recently, the left distal radial artery approach (ldTRA) has been introduced as an alternative to feasibility and safety while satisfying both patient and operator convenience. The left palm is positioned facing the floor at the left groin. Left distal radial artery is punctured at the level of anatomical snuffbox. Ferdinand Kiemeneij reported that CAG and PCI were successfully performed in 70 patients.

There are no nerve and vein in the anatomical snuffbox. And distal radial artery is located at superficial area. So, there may be potential advantage to reduce bleeding complication and nerve injury. Moreover, ldTRA can be an alternative method for the patient requiring arteriovenous fistula and for the patient preparing coronary artery bypass graft because there is no injury of left radial artery.

The patients have potential bleeding risk because dual antiplatelet agents (aspirin 300mg and clopidogrel 300mg) and more than 3,000 units of unfractionated heparin should be loaded for CAG and PCI. The effective hemostasis method has not yet been established after ldTRA. Therefore, it is important to establish effective hemostasis method and timing. However, like TRA, ldTRA requires a learning curve to be mastered, and it cannot be performed if the pulse is not palpable. There are few studies related to ldTRA. The purpose of this prospective observational study is to assess the feasibility and safety of the ldTRA for CAG and PCI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease Radial Artery Injury at Wrist and Hand Level

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ldTRA

Patients who are planned to perform coronary angiography will be enrolled via left distal radial artery

ldTRA

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After puncture of left distal radial artery, coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention, if needed, will be performed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ldTRA

After puncture of left distal radial artery, coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention, if needed, will be performed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients over 20 years old requiring coronary angiography
* Patients who are palpable left distal radial artery
* Patients who agreed to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who are not palpable left distal radial artery
* Patients who are positive in Modified Allen's test (suspicious of occlusion of ulnar artery)
* Pregnant women
* Patients who are not appropriate for the study
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Samjin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wonju Severance Christian Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Seung Hwan Lee

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Seung-Hwan Lee, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital

Wŏnju, Gangwon-do, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI). EuroIntervention. 2017 Sep 20;13(7):851-857. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00079.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28506941 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LeDRA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Swan-Ganz Catheter Insertion
NCT03929770 UNKNOWN NA