Comparison of the Bulb Aspirator to a Nasal Oral Aspirator in the Treatment of Bronchiolitis

NCT ID: NCT03288857

Last Updated: 2019-04-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

236 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-11-22

Study Completion Date

2019-03-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators aim to compare the standard bulb aspirator with that of a nasal oral aspirator. The hypothesis is that use of a nasal oral aspirator is more effective at removing nasal secretions in the treatment of bronchiolitis as measured by a predicted 50% decrease in the rate of unscheduled bronchiolitis return visits. The primary endpoint will be the number of unscheduled bronchiolitis return visits; secondary endpoints will include measurements of oral intake, respiratory relief, parental device preference and adverse events.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study will be a single center, single blind, randomized controlled trial in the pediatric emergency department (ED) at Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas (DCMC). An ED discharge diagnosis of bronchiolitis will trigger patients to be randomized to receive a bulb aspirator or nasal oral aspirator for home secretion management use. Prior to dispensing the randomized aspirator, a pre-distribution questionnaire will be administered. Additionally, patients will receive a diary to complete for 3 days post ED discharge. Research personnel will call families on day 4 as a reminder to return the diary and again on day 14 to obtain a verbal post-study questionnaire. Research personnel will perform chart review on all patients looking for unscheduled patient return visits for bronchiolitis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bronchiolitis Aspirator

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bulb Aspirator

If randomized to the bulb aspirator group, the patient will be sent home with a bulb aspirator to use for home nasal secretion management

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Nasal Oral Aspirator (NeilMed Naspira)

If randomized to the nasal oral aspirator group, patient will be sent home with a nasal oral aspirator to use for home nasal secretion management

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NeilMed Naspira

Intervention Type DEVICE

NeilMed Naspira is a nasal-oral aspirator

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

NeilMed Naspira

NeilMed Naspira is a nasal-oral aspirator

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children \>28 days of life to \< 2 years of age discharged home from the DCMC ED with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis (diagnosis made per provider discretion)
* Caregiver fluent in English or Spanish

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous enrollment
* Hospital admission
* Parental refusal to be randomized to an aspirator device (i.e., family prefers current device and does not wish to be randomized to a potentially different product)
* Current bacterial pneumonia
* Diagnosis of asthma
* Chronic lung disease
* Significant underlying cardiac disease
* Chronic neuromuscular disease
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Month

Maximum Eligible Age

24 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Texas at Austin

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Whitney Schwarz

Principle Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schwarz WW, Wilkinson M, Allen A. Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Bulb Aspirator With a Nasal-Oral Aspirator in the Treatment of Bronchiolitis. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Feb 1;38(2):e529-e533. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002372.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35100758 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2017-06-0086

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Isotonic Saline for Children With Bronchiolitis
NCT05902702 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Nebulized Hypertonic Saline for Bronchiolitis
NCT00619918 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Hypertonic Saline for Acute Bronchiolitis
NCT01247064 COMPLETED PHASE4