Removable Partial Denture Abutments Restored With Monolithic Zirconia Crowns
NCT ID: NCT03283709
Last Updated: 2020-03-13
Study Results
Results available
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
TERMINATED
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
1 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2017-12-01
Study Completion Date
2019-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of an all-ceramic dental crown material to restore the abutment teeth of partially-edentulous patients who need removable partial dentures (RPD). The outcomes of the treatment group (all-ceramic crowns) will be compared to a similarly-treated control group whose RPD abutment teeth are restored using conventional metal and metal-ceramic crowns. Primary outcomes of interest include crown survival, abutment tooth survival and RPD survival.The null hypothesis is that at the conclusion of the study there will be no differences in outcomes between the two groups.
All dental treatment, including dental hygiene and periodontal care, fillings, crowns and RPD fabrication will be provided by predoctoral dental students in the University of Kentucky College of Dentistry student clinics. Students treating the subjects will be supervised by licensed, technique-calibrated faculty specialists. Following the completion of dental treatment, enrolled subjects will be clinically re-evaluated by investigators at 6 months, and at annual intervals thereafter for 5 years following RPD delivery.
All dental treatment, including dental hygiene and periodontal care, fillings, crowns and RPD fabrication will be provided by predoctoral dental students in the University of Kentucky College of Dentistry student clinics. Students treating the subjects will be supervised by licensed, technique-calibrated faculty specialists. Following the completion of dental treatment, enrolled subjects will be clinically re-evaluated by investigators at 6 months, and at annual intervals thereafter for 5 years following RPD delivery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Post-retained Restorations for RPD Abutments
NCT03466437
Tooth, Nonvital
Composite Resins
Metal Ceramic Restorations
+2 more
UNKNOWN
NA
Minimal Invasive Rehabilitation of Tooth Loss in the Anterior Segment
NCT01997827
Unsatisfactory or Defective Restoration of Tooth
WITHDRAWN
NA
Manually Versus Digitally Fabricated Removable Partial Dentures
NCT01191073
Partially Edentulous Patients
COMPLETED
NA
A Prospective Clinical Trial Evaluating Outcomes of Surveyed Zirconia Crowns
NCT06564337
Removable Partial Denture
Dental Crown
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
A Descriptive, Prospective Clinical Study to Evaluate Full Dentures Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing
NCT03997604
Mouth, Edentulous
WITHDRAWN
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will investigate the use of highly esthetic, second and third generation multi-layer zirconia crown materials to restore removable partial denture abutment teeth. All performed treatment will be the standard of care and to the usual and customary standards used in United states dental clinics for crown and RPD procedures. Treatment subjects will have RPD abutment teeth restored with either Noritake Katana STML (anterior teeth) or HTML (premolars and molars) zirconia crowns, and periodically evaluated for 60 months following RPD delivery. Outcomes will be compared to a similarly treated control group restored with metal, metal-ceramic, or a combination of metal and metal-ceramic crowns.
Following informed consent, subjects will be randomly assigned using an internet program (https://www.randomizer.org/) to either a treatment (zirconia abutment tooth crown) or control (metal or metal-ceramic abutment tooth crown) group. Using information from the oral examination, articulated diagnostic casts will be evaluated , the RPD design confirmed, and the need for a crown on one or more abutment teeth verified. Enrolled subjects will be given oral hygiene instruction at the beginning of the study. They will also be instructed to brush their teeth twice daily using an OTC fluoride dentifrice of their choice. They will also be asked to use a 0.05% NaF oral rinse for 1 minute daily.
Abutment teeth must be in function with the opposing arch and vital at the beginning of the study. Vitality will be be determined using a synthesis of history, percussion, palpation and pulp testing. Pulp tests will be conducted using cold and an EPT, and the facial, lingual and occlusal (incisal) surfaces of all abutment teeth will be tested for responsiveness. If abutment tooth vitality is confirmed, teeth requiring surveyed crowns will be prepared and restored using standardized clinical and laboratory guidelines.
Abutment teeth restored with metal and zirconia crowns will be prepared and restored using the following clinical and laboratory guidelines. The margin will be a circumferential chamfer prepared to a depth of 0.5 mm with a rounded internal line angle and a 90° cavosurface exit angle. Margin height will be at or slightly coronal to the free gingival margin where possible. Axial surfaces will be prepared with a total occlusal convergence of \>6° but not to exceed 20°. Incisal and facial surfaces will be reduced 0.7-1.0 mm. Functional surfaces will be reduced to 1.0 mm of opposing tooth clearance with the exception of under rest seats, where opposing tooth clearance will be 2.0 mm. At completion, the prepared tooth should have a height to base ratio of 0.4. If inadequate retention and resistance form is identified following preparation of axial walls, supplementary grooves will be added, the number and location of which are at the discretion of the investigator. Final impressions will be made using PVS in a custom tray (Extrude) and poured in type V dental stone (Jadestone). Following fabrication, the working cast will be articulated, tripoded, and the die(s) sectioned, trimmed and scanned (3Shape D2000 laboratory scanner or equivalent). The crown(s) will be waxed to full contour. Rest seats, undercuts and guide planes will then be developed in wax. Once the waxup has been surveyed and finalized, it will be secured to the scanning platform and a new scan performed with the waxup in place. The data file with the die scan will be merged with the file that contains the waxup. The merged file will then be transmitted to a designated production facility where the zirconia crown(s) will be milled. Canines will be milled using Noritake Katana STML zirconia and premolars and molars will be milled using Noritake Katana HTML zirconia. Once the crown(s) are returned and the margins, contacts, occlusion and contours clinically verified, they will be luted using a self-adhesive resin-based cement (RelyX Unicem 2).
Porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crowns will be prepared and restored using a standard protocol utilizing the following guidelines. Posterior crowns will have metal occlusal surfaces with the porcelain-metal junction on the occlusal surface at half the distance between the central groove and the buccal cusp tip. Mesial, distal and lingual surfaces will be in metal, and the crown will have a disappearing metal margin on the facial surface. The facial preparation from mesiofacial to distofacial line angles will be a heavy chamfer or modified shoulder 1.0-1.2 mm in depth with a rounded internal line angle and a 90° cavosurface exit angle. Mesial, distal and lingual chamfer margins will be prepared to a horizontal depth of 0.5 mm. Facial margin height will be at or slightly apical to the free gingival margin. Mesial, distal and lingual margin height will be at or slightly coronal to the free gingival margin if possible. Functional surfaces will be prepared with opposing tooth clearance of 1.5 mm with the exception of under rest seats where opposing tooth clearance will be 2.0 mm. Nonfunctional cusp reduction will be 1.0 mm. Final impressions will be made using PVS (Extrude) in a custom tray and poured in type V dental stone (Jadestone). Following working cast fabrication it will be articulated, tripoded, and the die(s) prepared for conventional laboratory crown fabrication. Conventional (all-metal and PFM) surveyed crowns will be fabricated using noble and high-noble casting alloys and PFM crowns will use feldspathic porcelain as a veneering ceramic. Once the crown(s) are returned and the margins, contacts, occlusion and contours clinically verified, they will be luted using a self-adhesive resin-based cement (RelyX Unicem 2).
Qualifying RPD designs may be Kennedy class I-IV with up to two modification spaces, and will be designed using a standardized protocol. Maxillary major connectors may consist of a complete palatal plate, modified palatal plate, anterior-posterior palatal strap or palatal strap. Mandibular major connectors will consist of either a lingual plate or a lingual bar. Frameworks will be fabricated from nickel-chrome alloy (Ticonium), the denture bases acrylic resin (Lucitone 199), and artificial teeth will be DENTSPLY Trubyte IPN Portrait. To meet the definition of an RPD abutment tooth it must host a direct retainer consisting of an occlusal or cingulum rest, a proximal plate and a retentive clasp. Reciprocation must be provided in the form of a plate, reciprocating clasp or minor connector and rest. The plan for occlusion will be based upon the number and distribution of remaining natural teeth. If an arch opposing the RPD is edentulous and restored by a removable complete denture, then natural and artificial teeth will be arranged in bilateral balance. If anterior guidance is present on natural teeth in both arches it will be preserved so that artificial RPD teeth contact opposing teeth in maximum intercuspation only.
Clinical assessments, procedures and annual examinations will be performed in the University of Kentucky College of Dentistry second, third, and fourth floor student clinics. Clinical procedures will be performed by third and fourth year dental students, and clinical supervision for these procedures will be provided by licensed, calibrated investigators.
Following informed consent, subjects will be randomly assigned using an internet program (https://www.randomizer.org/) to either a treatment (zirconia abutment tooth crown) or control (metal or metal-ceramic abutment tooth crown) group. Using information from the oral examination, articulated diagnostic casts will be evaluated , the RPD design confirmed, and the need for a crown on one or more abutment teeth verified. Enrolled subjects will be given oral hygiene instruction at the beginning of the study. They will also be instructed to brush their teeth twice daily using an OTC fluoride dentifrice of their choice. They will also be asked to use a 0.05% NaF oral rinse for 1 minute daily.
Abutment teeth must be in function with the opposing arch and vital at the beginning of the study. Vitality will be be determined using a synthesis of history, percussion, palpation and pulp testing. Pulp tests will be conducted using cold and an EPT, and the facial, lingual and occlusal (incisal) surfaces of all abutment teeth will be tested for responsiveness. If abutment tooth vitality is confirmed, teeth requiring surveyed crowns will be prepared and restored using standardized clinical and laboratory guidelines.
Abutment teeth restored with metal and zirconia crowns will be prepared and restored using the following clinical and laboratory guidelines. The margin will be a circumferential chamfer prepared to a depth of 0.5 mm with a rounded internal line angle and a 90° cavosurface exit angle. Margin height will be at or slightly coronal to the free gingival margin where possible. Axial surfaces will be prepared with a total occlusal convergence of \>6° but not to exceed 20°. Incisal and facial surfaces will be reduced 0.7-1.0 mm. Functional surfaces will be reduced to 1.0 mm of opposing tooth clearance with the exception of under rest seats, where opposing tooth clearance will be 2.0 mm. At completion, the prepared tooth should have a height to base ratio of 0.4. If inadequate retention and resistance form is identified following preparation of axial walls, supplementary grooves will be added, the number and location of which are at the discretion of the investigator. Final impressions will be made using PVS in a custom tray (Extrude) and poured in type V dental stone (Jadestone). Following fabrication, the working cast will be articulated, tripoded, and the die(s) sectioned, trimmed and scanned (3Shape D2000 laboratory scanner or equivalent). The crown(s) will be waxed to full contour. Rest seats, undercuts and guide planes will then be developed in wax. Once the waxup has been surveyed and finalized, it will be secured to the scanning platform and a new scan performed with the waxup in place. The data file with the die scan will be merged with the file that contains the waxup. The merged file will then be transmitted to a designated production facility where the zirconia crown(s) will be milled. Canines will be milled using Noritake Katana STML zirconia and premolars and molars will be milled using Noritake Katana HTML zirconia. Once the crown(s) are returned and the margins, contacts, occlusion and contours clinically verified, they will be luted using a self-adhesive resin-based cement (RelyX Unicem 2).
Porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crowns will be prepared and restored using a standard protocol utilizing the following guidelines. Posterior crowns will have metal occlusal surfaces with the porcelain-metal junction on the occlusal surface at half the distance between the central groove and the buccal cusp tip. Mesial, distal and lingual surfaces will be in metal, and the crown will have a disappearing metal margin on the facial surface. The facial preparation from mesiofacial to distofacial line angles will be a heavy chamfer or modified shoulder 1.0-1.2 mm in depth with a rounded internal line angle and a 90° cavosurface exit angle. Mesial, distal and lingual chamfer margins will be prepared to a horizontal depth of 0.5 mm. Facial margin height will be at or slightly apical to the free gingival margin. Mesial, distal and lingual margin height will be at or slightly coronal to the free gingival margin if possible. Functional surfaces will be prepared with opposing tooth clearance of 1.5 mm with the exception of under rest seats where opposing tooth clearance will be 2.0 mm. Nonfunctional cusp reduction will be 1.0 mm. Final impressions will be made using PVS (Extrude) in a custom tray and poured in type V dental stone (Jadestone). Following working cast fabrication it will be articulated, tripoded, and the die(s) prepared for conventional laboratory crown fabrication. Conventional (all-metal and PFM) surveyed crowns will be fabricated using noble and high-noble casting alloys and PFM crowns will use feldspathic porcelain as a veneering ceramic. Once the crown(s) are returned and the margins, contacts, occlusion and contours clinically verified, they will be luted using a self-adhesive resin-based cement (RelyX Unicem 2).
Qualifying RPD designs may be Kennedy class I-IV with up to two modification spaces, and will be designed using a standardized protocol. Maxillary major connectors may consist of a complete palatal plate, modified palatal plate, anterior-posterior palatal strap or palatal strap. Mandibular major connectors will consist of either a lingual plate or a lingual bar. Frameworks will be fabricated from nickel-chrome alloy (Ticonium), the denture bases acrylic resin (Lucitone 199), and artificial teeth will be DENTSPLY Trubyte IPN Portrait. To meet the definition of an RPD abutment tooth it must host a direct retainer consisting of an occlusal or cingulum rest, a proximal plate and a retentive clasp. Reciprocation must be provided in the form of a plate, reciprocating clasp or minor connector and rest. The plan for occlusion will be based upon the number and distribution of remaining natural teeth. If an arch opposing the RPD is edentulous and restored by a removable complete denture, then natural and artificial teeth will be arranged in bilateral balance. If anterior guidance is present on natural teeth in both arches it will be preserved so that artificial RPD teeth contact opposing teeth in maximum intercuspation only.
Clinical assessments, procedures and annual examinations will be performed in the University of Kentucky College of Dentistry second, third, and fourth floor student clinics. Clinical procedures will be performed by third and fourth year dental students, and clinical supervision for these procedures will be provided by licensed, calibrated investigators.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Crowns
Denture
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing treatment outcomes for partial edentulism using two restorative materials. A convenience sample of study participants will be randomly assigned to either a treatment group or a control group.
Primary Study Purpose
TREATMENT
Blinding Strategy
NONE
No masking
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Full-contour monolithic Zirconia crowns
If participants assigned to this arm are in need of surveyed crowns on RPD abutment teeth they will be fabricated from multi-layered monolithic zirconia
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
Full-contour monolithic zirconia abutment crowns
Intervention Type
DEVICE
Subjects with RPD abutment teeth that require surveyed crowns will have them fabricated from monolithic multi-layered zirconia
Conventional abutment crowns
If participants assigned to this arm are in need of surveyed crowns on RPD abutment teeth they will be fabricated from type III gold or high-noble metal veneered with feldspathic porcelain
Group Type
OTHER
Conventional abutment crowns
Intervention Type
DEVICE
Subjects with RPD abutment teeth that require surveyed crowns will have them fabricated from noble or high noble metals, veneered with feldspathic porcelain
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Full-contour monolithic zirconia abutment crowns
Subjects with RPD abutment teeth that require surveyed crowns will have them fabricated from monolithic multi-layered zirconia
Intervention Type
DEVICE
Conventional abutment crowns
Subjects with RPD abutment teeth that require surveyed crowns will have them fabricated from noble or high noble metals, veneered with feldspathic porcelain
Intervention Type
DEVICE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Partially edentulous and treatment planned for an RPD
* Requires at least 1 surveyed crown on an abutment tooth
* Abutment teeth and RPD in function with opposing arch
* Abutment teeth vital at time of study enrollment
* English literacy, cognitively capable of understanding study and consent documents
* Cognitively and functionally capable of performing prosthesis and oral self-care
* Requires at least 1 surveyed crown on an abutment tooth
* Abutment teeth and RPD in function with opposing arch
* Abutment teeth vital at time of study enrollment
* English literacy, cognitively capable of understanding study and consent documents
* Cognitively and functionally capable of performing prosthesis and oral self-care
Exclusion Criteria
* Any chronic or degenerative condition which impairs consent capability
* Any cognitive or motor condition which impairs ability to follow instructions or perform oral self-care
* Healthy enough to tolerate planned dental procedures without premedication
* Chronic infectious disease
* COPD
* Renal insufficiency
* Autoimmune or chronic inflammatory disorders
* Unstable asthma or diabetes
* Unstable hypertension
* Any cognitive or motor condition which impairs ability to follow instructions or perform oral self-care
* Healthy enough to tolerate planned dental procedures without premedication
* Chronic infectious disease
* COPD
* Renal insufficiency
* Autoimmune or chronic inflammatory disorders
* Unstable asthma or diabetes
* Unstable hypertension
Minimum Eligible Age
25 Years
Maximum Eligible Age
70 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hiroko Nagaoka
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hiroko Nagaoka
Assistant Professor
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Vaughan Hoefler, DDS, MBA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Kentucky
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Kentucky College of Dentistry
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
United States
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Douglass CW, Watson AJ. Future needs for fixed and removable partial dentures in the United States. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Jan;87(1):9-14. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.121204.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Campbell SD, Cooper L, Craddock H, Hyde TP, Nattress B, Pavitt SH, Seymour DW. Removable partial dentures: The clinical need for innovation. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Sep;118(3):273-280. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Abt E, Carr AB, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;(2):CD003814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003814.pub2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Benso B, Kovalik AC, Jorge JH, Campanha NH. Failures in the rehabilitation treatment with removable partial dentures. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Nov;71(6):1351-5. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.777780. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ettinger RL, Goettsche ZS, Qian F. The Extent and Scope of Prosthodontic Practice in Iowa. J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):113-121. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12588. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rehmann P, Orbach K, Ferger P, Wostmann B. Treatment outcomes with removable partial dentures: a retrospective analysis. Int J Prosthodont. 2013 Mar-Apr;26(2):147-50. doi: 10.11607/ijp.2959.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
De Kok IJ, Cooper LF, Guckes AD, McGraw K, Wright RF, Barrero CJ, Bak SY, Stoner LO. Factors Influencing Removable Partial Denture Patient-Reported Outcomes of Quality of Life and Satisfaction: A Systematic Review. J Prosthodont. 2017 Jan;26(1):5-18. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12526. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Murai S, Matsuda K, Ikebe K, Enoki K, Hatta K, Fujiwara K, Maeda Y. A field survey of the partially edentate elderly: Investigation of factors related to the usage rate of removable partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Nov;42(11):828-32. doi: 10.1111/joor.12318. Epub 2015 Jun 7.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Koyama S, Sasaki K, Yokoyama M, Sasaki T, Hanawa S. Evaluation of factors affecting the continuing use and patient satisfaction with Removable Partial Dentures over 5 years. J Prosthodont Res. 2010 Apr;54(2):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2009.11.007. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Dec;92(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.015.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Donovan TE. Factors essential for successful all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139 Suppl:14S-18S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0360.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kelly JR. Dental ceramics: what is this stuff anyway? J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139 Suppl:4S-7S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0359. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Spear F, Holloway J. Which all-ceramic system is optimal for anterior esthetics? J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139 Suppl:19S-24S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0358.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater. 2015 Jun;31(6):603-23. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Larsson C, Wennerberg A. The clinical success of zirconia-based crowns: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2014 Jan-Feb;27(1):33-43. doi: 10.11607/ijp.3647.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Le M, Papia E, Larsson C. The clinical success of tooth- and implant-supported zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Jun;42(6):467-80. doi: 10.1111/joor.12272. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ozkurt Z, Kazazoglu E. Clinical success of zirconia in dental applications. J Prosthodont. 2010 Jan;19(1):64-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00513.x. Epub 2009 Sep 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ozer F, Mante FK, Chiche G, Saleh N, Takeichi T, Blatz MB. A retrospective survey on long-term survival of posterior zirconia and porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns in private practice. Quintessence Int. 2014 Jan;45(1):31-8. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a30768.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Burns DR, Unger JW. The construction of crowns for removable partial denture abutment teeth. Quintessence Int. 1994 Jul;25(7):471-5.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kancyper S, Sierraalta M, Razzoog ME. All-ceramic surveyed crowns for removable partial denture abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Oct;84(4):400-2. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2000.110253.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Carracho JF, Razzoog ME. Removable partial denture abutments restored with all-ceramic surveyed crowns. Quintessence Int. 2006 Apr;37(4):283-8.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Yoon TH, Chang WG. The fabrication of a CAD/CAM ceramic crown to fit an existing partial removable dental prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Sep;108(3):143-6. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60137-1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pihlaja J, Napankangas R, Kuoppala R, Raustia A. Veneered zirconia crowns as abutment teeth for partial removable dental prostheses: a clinical 4-year retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Nov;114(5):633-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Denry I, Kelly JR. Emerging ceramic-based materials for dentistry. J Dent Res. 2014 Dec;93(12):1235-42. doi: 10.1177/0022034514553627. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Johansson C, Kmet G, Rivera J, Larsson C, Vult Von Steyern P. Fracture strength of monolithic all-ceramic crowns made of high translucent yttrium oxide-stabilized zirconium dioxide compared to porcelain-veneered crowns and lithium disilicate crowns. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014 Feb;72(2):145-53. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.822098. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Stober T, Bermejo JL, Rammelsberg P, Schmitter M. Enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns after 6 months of clinical use. J Oral Rehabil. 2014 Apr;41(4):314-22. doi: 10.1111/joor.12139. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Flinn BD, Raigrodski AJ, Mancl LA, Toivola R, Kuykendall T. Influence of aging on flexural strength of translucent zirconia for monolithic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Feb;117(2):303-309. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE, Ritter AV, Vallittu PK, Narhi TO, Lassila LV. Optical properties and light irradiance of monolithic zirconia at variable thicknesses. Dent Mater. 2015 Oct;31(10):1180-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.016. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Harada K, Raigrodski AJ, Chung KH, Flinn BD, Dogan S, Mancl LA. A comparative evaluation of the translucency of zirconias and lithium disilicate for monolithic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Aug;116(2):257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.019. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE, Cooper LF, Walter R. Fracture rate of monolithic zirconia restorations up to 5 years: A dental laboratory survey. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Sep;116(3):436-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.033. Epub 2016 May 11.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Belli R, Petschelt A, Hofner B, Hajto J, Scherrer SS, Lohbauer U. Fracture Rates and Lifetime Estimations of CAD/CAM All-ceramic Restorations. J Dent Res. 2016 Jan;95(1):67-73. doi: 10.1177/0022034515608187. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Batson ER, Cooper LF, Duqum I, Mendonca G. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Oct;112(4):770-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ueda K, Guth JF, Erdelt K, Stimmelmayr M, Kappert H, Beuer F. Light transmittance by a multi-coloured zirconia material. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(3):310-4. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2014-238. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Nordahl N, Vult von Steyern P, Larsson C. Fracture strength of ceramic monolithic crown systems of different thickness. J Oral Sci. 2015 Sep;57(3):255-61. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.57.255.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, Lumkemann N. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part II. Quintessence Int. 2017;48(6):441-450. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a38157.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health. 1994 Mar;11(1):3-11.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;25(4):284-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-0511-F1V
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Lithium Disilicate (CAD/CAM) Fixed Partial Dentures (FPD) Clinical Study
NCT03036566
TERMINATED
NA
Single-retainer Lithium Di-silicate Versus Zirconia Resin Bonded Bridge for Replacement of an Anterior Missing Tooth.
NCT05861921
COMPLETED
NA
A Smart Digital Workflow Towards High Precision and Through-Put Production for Removable Partial Dentures
NCT06273449
RECRUITING
NA
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction Between Conventional and Digital Removable Partial Dentures
NCT07228988
COMPLETED
NA
A Proof of Concept for All-ceramic Zirconia Resin Bonded Bridges for Canine, Premolar and Short Span Posterior Teeth
NCT02793037
COMPLETED
NA
Polyetheretherketone vs Cobalt-chromium Telescopic Removable Partial Denture in Kennedy Class I Patients Regarding Oral Health Related Quality of Life
NCT03771248
UNKNOWN
NA
Single Retainer All-Ceramic Resin-bonded Fixed Dental Protheses
NCT01411592
UNKNOWN
NA
Partial Rehabilitation Using a PEEK-acrylic Resin Removable Partial Denture
NCT05589506
TERMINATED
NA
Evaluation of Occlusal Adjustment Material Removal on Monolithic Zirconia Blocks: An In Vitro Study
NCT07280130
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
One-piece and Two-piece Zirconia Abutments in Single Implant Crowns in Esthetic Region
NCT05583123
UNKNOWN
NA
Evaluation of Digital 3D Printed Temporary Removable Partial Denture.
NCT06106243
UNKNOWN
NA
Clinical Outcomes of CAD/CAM Single-Retainer Monolithic Zirconia Ceramic Resin-Bonded Fixed Dentures Bonded With Two Different Resin Cements
NCT04491097
UNKNOWN
NA
Zirconia Based Fixed Dental Prostheses
NCT02220764
COMPLETED
NA
Clinical Investigation on Zirconia-ceramic Three-unit Bridges With CAD-on Veneering
NCT02175329
COMPLETED
NA
OHQoL With Removable Partial Dentures; a Pilot Study
NCT01953991
COMPLETED
NA
A Study About Patient Satisfaction With Laser-sintered Removable Partial Dentures
NCT02769715
COMPLETED
NA
Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework in Removable Partial Denture Regarding Retention
NCT03777280
UNKNOWN
NA
Minimally Invasive Treatment of Worn Dentition With Innovative CAD-CAM Composites
NCT02828696
UNKNOWN
NA
Prosthetic Outcomes and Clinical Performance of Implant Supported Zirconia Crowns
NCT06417632
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Comparing Cobalt-Chromium Versus PEEK Secondary Telescopic Crowns on Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture.
NCT06637930
COMPLETED
NA
Stereolithographic Technique for Dentures
NCT02911038
COMPLETED
Two-unit Cantilever Implant Prostheses Made of Monolithic Zirconia or PFM
NCT04713800
RECRUITING
NA
Effect of Zirconia Implant Supported PEKK Crowns Versus Lithium Disilicate Crowns on Esthetics
NCT03521024
UNKNOWN
NA
Conventional Versus 3D Printing Duplication Techniques of Complete Denture
NCT06588140
COMPLETED
NA
Properties and Clinical Performance of Zirconia-based Dental Ceramics
NCT00737308
COMPLETED
NA