CABI: Antibiotic Duration for Complicated Intra-ABdominal Infection

NCT ID: NCT03265834

Last Updated: 2021-06-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

31 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-01

Study Completion Date

2018-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Complicated intra-ABdominal Infections (CABIs) are abdominal infections where there is an abscess inside the abdomen, or a hole (perforation) in an abdominal organ such that infected material e.g. faeces, leaks into the abdominal cavity. A recent review of CABIs after gut surgery found that they can occur in several ways. They can occur in different parts of the abdomen, can be different sizes, and may or may not be caused by a perforated bowel. Management includes, where possible, surgical drainage of an abscess or treatment of the damaged bowel. In addition, all patients are given antibiotic therapy. Despite the varied ways that CABIs occur, we currently tend to treat all CABIs with antibiotics in a similar way. CABIs are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite a significant amount of disease there is little clinical evidence with which to base treatment on. One research study evaluated a short course of antibiotics (4 days) compared with a longer course (up to 10 days) in combination with surgical removal of infection. There was little difference in outcomes, but in both groups about 1 out of every 7 patients had a relapse. A recent review of patients with CABI in Leeds, not in a research study and where surgical removal infection is uncommon and antibiotic durations were short, showed that the risk of relapse was even higher (about 1 in every 3 patients). The antibiotic management of CABIs in the UK is variable and involves giving between 4 days to 28 days of antibiotics.

In summary, there is an unacceptably high relapse rate in patients treated for CABI, and uncertainty about the best length of antibiotic therapy that should be used to prevent these relapses. We therefore propose to investigate if long course antibiotic therapy (28 days) is more effective than short course antibiotics (≤10 days) in preventing relapses of CABI.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Complicated intra-abdominal infection (CABI) extends beyond the hollow viscus of origin into the peritoneal space and is associated with either abscess formation or peritonitis \[Solomkin 2010\]. CABIs are heterogeneous in aetiology and include spontaneous infections arising from a perforated viscus, including the stomach, biliary tree, colon, appendix and reproductive organs. In addition there are post-operative complications such as peritonitis, abscess, and failure of surgical anastomoses. CABIs are also heterogeneous in their characteristics. A recent review of organ space Surgical Site Infections (SSI-Os) after colorectal surgery demonstrated that infections were varied with regard their location, as well as size and number and nature of collections, and presence of an ongoing source e.g. anastomotic breakdown (Rothwell 2016). Despite the varied origin of these infections, there are similar management strategies which centre on the source control, e.g. drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collections, and administration of antibiotic therapy. CABIs are a common in-hospital clinical challenge, in part due to the varied pathology they are caused by, and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality (DeFrances 2005, Brun-Buisson 1995). Despite this burden of disease, there is little clinical evidence with which to base treatment on, even before taking account of their heterogeneous nature. One study of CABI following source control procedures evaluated a short course of antibiotics (4 days) compared to a course of up to 2 weeks after clinical and biochemical improvement (up to 10 days). Whilst there was little difference in outcomes, both groups had a high relapse rate of approximately 15%. In addition, it is common for source control procedures not to be completed in routine clinical practice, being completed in only 17% of Leeds patients with post-operative CABI (Rothwell 2016). In this Leeds data of post-operative CABIs, where source control rates are low relapse rates were 40% (Rothwell 2016). For CABI infections, standard UK management is variable and involves between 4 and 42 days' antibiotics. This indicates an unacceptably high relapse rate in patients treated for CABI where source control is and is not undertaken. We therefore propose to investigate if long course antibiotic therapy (28 days) is clinically more effective than short course antibiotics (4 days) in preventing relapses of CABI. This study will include patients who have and have not undergone source control procedures which will be completed as per standard practice.

Complicated intra-abdominal infections require source control when possible, e.g. a surgical procedure to remove an infection, and antibiotic therapy to obtain cure. Source control is not always possible. CABIs are associated with mortality and prolongation of hospitalisation. After apparently effective treatment, potentially including source control procedures and antibiotics, infections can relapse. There are a number of reasons for relapse; one is that antibiotic treatment may not have been given for long enough to eradicate the bacteria from, what should be, a sterile intra-abdominal cavity. Antibiotics are given until a patient is better, but not until all bacteria are eradicated, allowing them to regrow and re-start an infection. Standard antibiotic duration is variable: some doctors provide long courses and others short. We therefore want to compare durations, to see if longer courses of antibiotics are able to help prevent these relapses, or if shorter courses are as effective but have fewer side effects. We have not identified closely related strategies which may optimise the management of CABIs.

The research hypothesis is therefore: In patients with CABI, regardless of source control intervention, there will be a lower relapse rate when treated with 28 days of antibiotics compared to ≤10 days of antibiotics.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Complicated Intraabdominal Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Long course antibiotic therapy (28 days)

Antibiotic therapy for a duration of 28 days

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

28 days of antibiotics

Intervention Type OTHER

Antibiotic duration

Short course antibiotic therapy (≤10 days)

Antibiotic therapy for a duration of ≤10 days

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

< 10 days of antibiotics

Intervention Type OTHER

Antibiotic duration

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

< 10 days of antibiotics

Antibiotic duration

Intervention Type OTHER

28 days of antibiotics

Antibiotic duration

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults \>18 years
* The diagnosis of a definite CABI
* Capable of giving informed consent
* No practical or clinical barriers to consuming 28 days of antibiotic therapy, which may include consumption of antibiotics at home

Exclusion Criteria

* a CABI diagnosed within the previous year
* a CABI diagnosed \>6 days prior to screening
* uncomplicated cholecystitis/cholangitis/gall bladder empyema (no perforation or extra-biliary abscess
* a skin and soft tissue infection/abscess not communicating with the peritoneal space
* primary complicated or uncomplicated appendicitis managed surgically
* intra-abdominal infection associated with pancreatitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, primary (spontaneous) bacterial peritonitis (SBP), continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis peritonitis (CAPD peritonitis) and Clostridium difficile infection. concurrent infection requiring more than 10 days of therapy
* Infection with a highly resistant bacterium such that antibiotic treatment is considered to be a significantly sub-optimal by the treating microbiologist e.g. multi-resistant carbapenemase producing Entrobacteriacea
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Leeds

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Andrew Kirby

Associate clinical professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrew Kirby, MBChB

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Bradley JS, Rodvold KA, Goldstein EJ, Baron EJ, O'Neill PJ, Chow AW, Dellinger EP, Eachempati SR, Gorbach S, Hilfiker M, May AK, Nathens AB, Sawyer RG, Bartlett JG. Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Jan 15;50(2):133-64. doi: 10.1086/649554.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20034345 (View on PubMed)

Rothwell A, Burke D, Burnside G, Kirby A. Characteristics of Organ Space Surgical Site Infection after colorectal surgery. In preparation.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

DeFrances CJ, Cullen KA, Kozak LJ. National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2005 annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data. Vital Health Stat 13. 2007 Dec;(165):1-209.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18350768 (View on PubMed)

Brun-Buisson C, Doyon F, Carlet J, Dellamonica P, Gouin F, Lepoutre A, Mercier JC, Offenstadt G, Regnier B. Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults. A multicenter prospective study in intensive care units. French ICU Group for Severe Sepsis. JAMA. 1995 Sep 27;274(12):968-74.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7674528 (View on PubMed)

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18064739 (View on PubMed)

Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, Wood AM, Carpenter JR. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009 Jun 29;338:b2393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2393.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19564179 (View on PubMed)

Sawyer RG, Claridge JA, Nathens AB, Rotstein OD, Duane TM, Evans HL, Cook CH, O'Neill PJ, Mazuski JE, Askari R, Wilson MA, Napolitano LM, Namias N, Miller PR, Dellinger EP, Watson CM, Coimbra R, Dent DL, Lowry SF, Cocanour CS, West MA, Banton KL, Cheadle WG, Lipsett PA, Guidry CA, Popovsky K; STOP-IT Trial Investigators. Trial of short-course antimicrobial therapy for intraabdominal infection. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 21;372(21):1996-2005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411162.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25992746 (View on PubMed)

Ahmed S, Brown R, Pettinger R, Vargas-Palacios A, Burke D, Kirby A. The CABI Trial: an Unblinded Parallel Group Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial of Long-Course Antibiotic Therapy (28 Days) Compared with Short Course (</= 10 Days) in the Prevention of Relapse in Adults Treated for Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Apr;25(4):1045-1052. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04545-2. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32140989 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MB16/156

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Antibiotic Instillation in Appendicitis
NCT05470517 COMPLETED PHASE2
Precision Antibiotic Dosing for Appendectomy
NCT06860802 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1