Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-09-01
2018-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Medasense's PMD-200 During Surgery and Post Anesthesia Care
NCT03276260
The Influence of the Volume of Injuries and Surgical Operations on the Results of Pain Treatment in Patients With Gunshot and Mine-explosive Wounds at the Stages of Treatment
NCT05485298
Patient Controlled Analgesia Pump Cues on Patient Satisfaction
NCT02456909
The Prediction for Postoperative Pain
NCT03585088
Comparison of Methods for Recording Post Operative Pain
NCT06206148
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective assessment of nociception poses a multitude of challenges. First, sedated or unconscious patients by definition cannot experience pain. Under these circumstances, it is more accurate to assess the nociception level. A body of research suggests that not managing nociception can lead to central changes in pain pathways that predispose individuals to chronic pain states.
Current "gold-standard" pain assessment tools rely on self-reporting, requiring an individual both to process external information and to communicate this personal experience.
Circumstances exist where self-reporting is not possible, or where it is unreliable. In these situations, surrogate markers utilize changes in behavioral or physiological parameters. However, their use can be associated with considerable shortcomings. They may be unreliable, hampered by observational bias, or influenced by disease processes or pharmacological interventions. Developing an objective method of pain assessment therefore needs to ensure tools that are sensitive and specific to pain. They need to be observer-independent, not reliant on the patient's ability to communicate and not influenced by disease characteristics.
A novel measure of nociception is the nociception level (NoL) index. It is based on objective measures related to changes in the autonomic nervous system. The NoL index ranges from 0 to 100 and is based on a nonlinear combination of nociception-related physiologic variables, specifically heart rate, heart rate variability at the 0.15- to 0.4-Hz band power, photoplethysmograph wave amplitude , skin conductance level, number of skin conductance fluctuations, and their time derivatives.
In the trial the invastigator assume that combination of several parameters into a single one (Nol Index) may have a stronger association with pain intensity than each of the parameters alone.
Medasense Biometrics Ltd. developed the PMD-200, a nociception/pain monitor that is based on a patented, non-invasive technology enabling objective, continuous assessment of changes in pain level. Information is collected through a finger-mounted probe that monitors changes in multiple pain-related physiological parameters (pulse rate, photoplethismograph amplitude, heart rate variability, skin conductance level and number of skin conductance fluctuations). This information is analyzed using proprietary artificial intelligence algorithms, which convert the physiological data to a real-time nociception Index.
The rationale for developing the device is to provide caregivers with the ability to measure pain level (or nociception level for unconscious patients) during any procedure and at any time. This information can prevent unnecessary pain, avoid overdose or under usage of analgesic agents, enhance recovery and decrease hospitalization time and costs, while answering the critical need to supervise patients' pain/nociception level.
The finger probe sensor of PMD-200 collects the following signals:
1. PhotoPlethysmograph (PPG) - used to optically obtain a volumetric measurement of the finger's tip blood vessels. The trace is generated by light emitted from a LED (\~780nm) and collected by a photo diode.
2. Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) - used to measure the electrical conductance of the skin, which varies with its moisture level. The conductance is obtained by injecting a current between two electrodes placed on the finger and measuring the voltage.
3. Temperature (TMP) - used to measure the skin temperature using a thermistor.
4. Accelerometer (ACC) - used to measure finger movements The technology consists of measurements of a number of pain-related physiological parameters that corresponds with the autonomic nervous system's response to pain, and using the company's proprietary algorithms, 'translating' these measurements into an index that represents the pain response, the NoLâ„¢ (Nociception Level) Index. This index is displayed on a bedside monitor.
The measurements taken by the Medasense monitor include galvanic skin response, photoplethysmography , skin temperature and movement .
All measurements are taken simultaneously using a single finger probe attached to the patient's finger. Miniature sensors are embedded into the probe, which includes reusable and single use components. The finger probe is connected to the bedside monitor for processing of the data.
Operating the PMD-200 monitor is similar to other standard-of-care systems that track changes in patients' vital functions, such as heart rate, blood pressure or blood oxygen saturation. Such monitors obtain their information from sensing element(s) attached to the patient, display the respective clinical values on a bedside, generate relevant alerts, and maintain records of the information tracked.
2. Methods Population study - electively patients that are going to underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
1. First measurement will be taken a day before surgery by placing the device on a patient's 3rd finger for 3-5 minutes in a quiet environment. The measurement will be the NOL value (baseline) without pain. The patient will be asked to estimate the pain level using VAS (visual analog scale) score of 0-10.
2. After determining the NOL value, an IV catheter will be inserted, as required pre-operatively.
3. The device will continue measuring the pain level while the patient will be asked to estimate the pain level again using VAS .
4. The patient will be operated.
5. The patient will receive post-operative analgesia according to ward protocol - PRN IV Dipyrone 1g or PRN IV Paracetamol 1g.
6. The device will measure pain from 5 minutes before until 20 minutes after analgesics administration. During this time VAS score will be taken. This measure will be taken up to 3 times during the post-operative hospitalization.
7. The measurement will be taken in a quiet environment without distractions. Any distraction during measurement will be noted as an EVENT.
3. Aims
1. To examine the response of NoL Index in relation to pain
2. To develop objective tool to assess the severity of pain in post-operative patient.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PMD 200
finger sensor which estimate objectively the pain level
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Elective patient for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
* Absence of acute or chronic pain
Exclusion Criteria
* Dementia and mental retardation
* Drugs that influence the autonomic system as beta blocker
* Arrhythmia
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Meir Hospital, Kfar Saba, Israel
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Guy Elad
principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
haim Paran, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
clalit
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0054-17-MMC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.