New Markers for Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

NCT ID: NCT03249636

Last Updated: 2017-08-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-12-31

Study Completion Date

2019-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia , also known as acute lymphocytic leukemia, characterized by the overproduction and accumulation of cancerous, immature white blood cells, known as lymphoblasts, causing damage and death by inhibiting the production of normal cells (such as red and white blood cells and platelets) in the bone marrow and by spreading (infiltrating) to other organs. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia is most common in childhood, with a peak incidence at 2-5 years of age and another peak in old age.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In recent years, new pieces of information obtained through immunophenotyping, cytogenetics and genomic profiling. Chemotherapy resistance have contributed to a better understanding of the pathology of this complex disorder and to recognition of subgroups of patients who respond differently to therapy.

The possible impact of the expression of various markers has been studied in ALL.

In patients with acute leukemia, treatment decisions are based on the status of peripheral blood and bone marrow cellularity. This provides a measure of the efficacy of therapy and can reveal leukemia relapse. The reliability of morphologic examination of peripheral blood and bone marrow largely depends on the hematologist's expertise, and its sensitivity is fundamentally limited by the similarities in appearance between leukemic cells and normal lympho-hematopoietic progenitors. Therefore, patients in complete morphologic remission may still have a large number of residual leukemic cells (potentially up to 1010).

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is currently the most powerful prognostic indicator in Precursor B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B ALL). MRD analysis can be done by either flow cytometric or molecular techniques. Flow cytometric detection holds potential for wider applicability than molecular techniques because flow cytometric methods for leukemia diagnosis are already established at most cancer centers worldwide.

Flow cytometric detection of MRD is based on the principle that ALL cells express immunophenotypic features that can be used to distinguish them from normal hematopoietic cells, including hematogones and activated lymphocytes commonly referred to as Leukemia associated immunophenotype (LAIP). In virtually all patients with ALL, leukemia-associated immunophenotypes can be defined at diagnosis and then used to monitor MRD during treatment.

The reliability of flow cytometric MRD assays depends on several factors. The most important being the correct marker combination in use. Applicability is limited in some cases by the lack of suitable leukemia associated immunophenotype (LAIP) with the currently used markers and also antigen immunomodulation post treatment. Therefore, the identification of new leukemia markers that are easily detectable and are stably expressed in a large proportion of ALL cases should simplify the application of MRD studies, help extend their benefit to all patients and possibly enhance the sensitivity of MRD detection.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ALL patients

New cases of patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia. Evaluation of markers 15 days after induction.

Flow cytometric analysis

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Level of expression of the markers and the correlation between the markers with each other and with the clinical presentation and impact on patients with ALL.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Flow cytometric analysis

Level of expression of the markers and the correlation between the markers with each other and with the clinical presentation and impact on patients with ALL.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1\. New cases of patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia. 2. Evaluation of markers 15 days after induction.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients died after induction
* Patients diagnosed as Non Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Maureen Farag

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maureen R Farag, Resident

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assiut University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Assiut University

Asyut, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rania M Bakry, Prof. Dr.

Role: CONTACT

01013341395

Noha G Sayed, Dr.

Role: CONTACT

01003305354

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Maureen R Farag

Role: primary

01018548568

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Campana D, Coustan-Smith E. Measurements of treatment response in childhood acute leukemia. Korean J Hematol. 2012 Dec;47(4):245-54. doi: 10.5045/kjh.2012.47.4.245. Epub 2012 Dec 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23320002 (View on PubMed)

Campana D, Behm FG. Immunophenotyping of leukemia. J Immunol Methods. 2000 Sep 21;243(1-2):59-75. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1759(00)00228-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10986407 (View on PubMed)

Inaba H, Greaves M, Mullighan CG. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet. 2013 Jun 1;381(9881):1943-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62187-4. Epub 2013 Mar 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23523389 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MFARAG

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.