Image Fusion and Calcification Raising in Trans Aortic Valve Implantation
NCT ID: NCT03247465
Last Updated: 2021-09-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-09-13
2017-09-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
One of them could be image fusion, since it may decrease radiation exposure and contrast agent use. It may also improve valve placement position leading to decreased complications.
40 prospective and consecutive patients will be included. Participants will be divided into two groups: the 20 first included will be control group, the 20 following patients will be the fusion group. For control group TAVI procedure will be the usual one, for fusion group the procedure will be the usual one with addition of computed tomography 3D images fusion with fluoroscopy 2D images.
Main evaluation criteria will be radiation exposure, measured by dose area product (DAP). Secondary evaluation criterion will be procedural as contrast agent volume used, procedure duration, subjective usefulness of image fusion or procedure failure evaluated immediately after procedure. The investigators will also evaluated procedure induced complications as de novo pacemaker implantation, de novo left bundle branch, vascular complication, major bleeding, acute kidney failure, significant aortic regurgitation. These complications occurrence will be evaluated after 1 month follow up, during the usual following consultation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Change in Coronary Microcirculation and FFR After TAVI in Patients With Cardiovascular Comorbidities
NCT04663334
Treatment of Concomitant Mitral Regurgitation by Mitral Valve Clipping in Patients With Successful Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
NCT04009434
Multi Modal Cardiac Imaging Prior Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
NCT01805739
Cardiac Amyloidosis Prevalence and Outcome in Aortic Stenosis Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
NCT05384418
Complete Functional Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis Before and After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Aortic Valve Stenosis
NCT05133843
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One of them could be image fusion, since it may decrease radiation exposure and contrast agent use correlated to acute kidney failure. It may also improve valve placement position, and the investigators know that many rhythmic (atrio-ventricular block) and valvular (significant aortic regurgitation) complications are partially due to placement mistakes. So the investigators hope that image fusion will decrease these complications.
The investigators will include 40 prospective and consecutive patients. Inclusion criterion will be all major patients admitted in Nantes CHU for transfemoral aortic valve replacement with SAPIEN® 3 valve. Exclusion criterion will be women of childbearing age without contraception, impossible written consent, judiciary protected people. After inclusion, patients will be divided into two groups: the 20 first included will be control group, the 20 following patients will be the fusion group. For control group TAVI procedure will be the usual one, for fusion group the procedure will be the usual one with addition of computed tomography 3D images fusion with fluoroscopy 2D images. The only difference during all patient medical care will be the addition of image fusion in fusion group. Before and after procedure, both groups will have the usual medical monitoring and the appropriated medical interventions to participants case.
Main evaluation criterion will be radiation exposure, measured by dose area product (DAP).
Secondary evaluation criterion will be procedural as:
* contrast agent volume used (mL),
* procedure duration (min),
* subjective usefulness of image fusion evaluated on a 0 to 3 scale
* procedure failure : death, more than one valve implantation, valve dysfunction (mean trans-valvular gradient \> 20 mmHg or moderate to severe aortic regurgitation) These criterions will be evaluated immediately after procedure.
The investigators will also evaluated procedure induced complications as:
* de novo pacemaker implantation
* de novo left bundle branch
* non minor vascular complication on VARC-2 definition
* major bleeding (BARC 3 or 5)
* acute kidney failure (AKIN 2 or 3)
* significant aortic regurgitation ≥ 2/4 These complications occurrence will be evaluated after 1 month follow up, during the usual following consultation with echocardiography.
Then differences between will be tested with appropriated statistical methods.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group "Fusion"
Trans aortic valve replacement with usual procedure with the addition of computed tomography 3D images and calcification raising to the usual fluoroscopy images.
Image Fusion
Addition of computed tomography 3D images and calcification raising to the usual fluoroscopy images.
Group "Control"
Trans aortic valve replacement with usual procedure
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Image Fusion
Addition of computed tomography 3D images and calcification raising to the usual fluoroscopy images.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient who accepted to participate to the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Judiciary protected people
* Minor
* Women of childbearing age without contraception
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nantes University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nantes University Hospital
Nantes, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RC17_0114
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.