Differential Diagnosis Between Granuloma and Radicular Cyst: Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

NCT ID: NCT03227172

Last Updated: 2017-07-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-01

Study Completion Date

2016-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The radiolucent periapical jaw lesions of 34 patients, which were surgically enucleated, were investigated by two radiologists using MRI, based on the same six criteria, to categorize the lesions as granulomas or radicular cysts. After apicoectomies, two oral pathologists (blinded to the radiologist's diagnoses) analyzed all specimens by referring to seven specific parameters and diagnosed the specimens as granulomas or radicular cysts. The inter-rater agreements between the radiologists and pathologists in terms of MRI and histological diagnoses, respectively, along with the discriminant power of the adopted criteria and the accuracy of the MRI assessments compared with the histopathologic results, were calculated.

A strong inter-rater reliability was observed between the two radiologists (k-statistic = 0.86, p = 0.0001) and the two pathologists (k-statistic = 0.88, p = 0.0001). Reliability was higher for the radiological (Guttmann's lambda lower bound \> 0.6) than histopathological criteria. The accuracy (true positives plus true negatives) of the radiologists was higher than that of the pathologists based on receiver operator characteristic analysis (area under the curve = 0.87 and 0.91, respectively). MRI reliability and accuracy were high and comparable to histopathological reliability, highlighting the usefulness of this non-invasive exam as a pre-treatment diagnostic method for periapical endodontic lesions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Periapical Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

apicoectomy

After flap elevation and osteotomy , peri-apical lesion and the root tip were located: after root-end resection using a fissure bur, the resected root tip and the pathological tissue were removed and immediately preserved in 1% formaldehyde solution.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patient age ≥ 18 years
* the diameter of the lesion ≥ 5 mm, assessed based on periapical x-ray,
* an acceptable endodontic treatment for the involved tooth.

Exclusion Criteria

* general medical contraindications for classification of the patient as level III or higher according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists,
* contraindication undergoing magnetic resonance: presence of a pacemaker or any metallic devices that could interfere with the magnetic field;
* severe claustrophobia,
* weight ≥ 130 kg
* intolerance to gadolinium-DTPA as a contrast agent;
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Bologna

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Giuseppe Lizio

research assistant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15034

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.