Is it Feasible?: Self-Affirmation for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Genetic Counseling
NCT ID: NCT03225170
Last Updated: 2024-05-29
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
64 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-08-15
2020-06-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Some women have a high chance of developing breast and ovarian cancer because of a change in a gene that is passed within a family from one generation to the next. These women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) have to make hard choices about tests and treatments. Researchers want to study how to help women to feel ready to make those choices. A kind of writing exercise might help if it is done before genetic counseling. This writing exercise is called a self-affirmation (SA) exercise. It may lead to better communication during counseling and better behavioral outcomes.
Objective:
To see if an SA exercise done before HBOC genetic counseling could improve client communication and behavior.
Eligibility:
* Clients: Adult female \>=18 years of age with initial appointment for HBOC risk with genetic counselor at St. Luke's Health System
* Genetic Counselors: Genetic counselors \>=18 years of age providing genetic counseling to clients at risk for HBOC
Design:
Clients will be screened by phone prior to their genetic counseling appointment.
They will arrive 15 minutes early to their appointment.
They will do a 10 to 15 minute survey and writing exercise. This includes questions about:
* Things that are important to them
* How they are feeling prior to the appointment
After their genetic counseling appointment, they will take a 10- to 15-minute follow-up survey. It can be in the office or online. It will include questions about:
* How they felt about the writing exercise
* How they felt about their genetic counseling
* If they had cancer
* If they were offered and had genetic testing
Genetic counselor participants will take a 2 to 5 minute survey after each session with a client in the study. This will include questions about how the client was in the session. They also will take a 10 to 15 minute survey at the end of the study. It will be about their opinions on the process of having their clients complete the writing exercise.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Development of a Genetic Counseling Patient Preference Intervention for Women at Elevated Risk for Breast Cancer
NCT05158452
Genetic Counseling Patient Preference Intervention Versus Conventional Genetic Counseling for Women at Elevated Risk for Breast Cancer
NCT05325151
Counseling Interventions for BRCA 1/2 Cancer Susceptibility Testing
NCT00165152
Understanding Decision Making Processes for Undergoing Genetic Testing Among Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer
NCT01386411
Identification and Referral of Women at Risk for Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer
NCT02786147
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this study clients will be invited to participate in an intervention before their genetic counseling appointment. The SA intervention is a short written exercise to reinforce clients' self-integrity (a global sense of personal adequacy) leading to more openness to threatening information within the genetic counseling session. Clients and genetic counselors will be surveyed to assess outcome measures and feasibility of the intervention.
Social science research has shown that when people are faced with threatening information they often seek to protect themselves and reject the threatening message. Message rejection can include minimizing the importance or discrediting the truth of the message. SA interventions aim to bolster self-integrity or esteem by focusing on aspects of participants' lives they value and thereby improving participants' self-perception and tolerance towards threatening messages. SA manipulations have been shown to increase patient communication within appointments and both intentions and actions toward behavior change.
Often in cancer genetic counseling appointments clients are confronted with the threat of having a significantly increased risk for cancers while being asked to make a decision about genetic testing. A self-affirmation intervention may facilitate greater client decision self-efficacy, empowerment, and positive behavior outcomes, such as communication with family regarding genetic risk and screening behaviors.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Self-affirmation (SA) group
Immediately prior to the scheduled cancer genetic counseling appointment, clients:
1. completed standardized questionnaires on self-affirmation (SA) intervention that focused on positive values of personal importance. The SA intervention required clients to rank 11 items (artistic skills, athletics, business/money, creativity, independence, music, politics, relationships with friends and family, religious values, sense of humor, spontaneity) from most important to least important and to elaborate on one that was most important to them and why;
2. 6-item standardized measure of anxiety questionnaire;
3. after the genetic counseling session, clients were required to fill out a post session questionnaire
Self Affirmation (SA)
Clients will be asked to rank artistic skills, athletics, business/money, creativity, independence, music, politics, relationships with friends and family, religious values, sense of humor, spontaneity from most important to least important. They will then be asked to write about the item that is most important to them and why it may be important to them.
Control group
Immediately prior to the scheduled cancer genetic counseling appointment, clients:
1. completed similar standardized questionnaire as the SA group, with a non-affirming exercise. The non-intervention required clients to rank 11 items (artistic skills, athletics, business/money, creativity, independence, music, politics, relationships with friends and family, religious values, sense of humor, spontaneity) from most important to least important and to elaborate on the 9th ranked item and why it might be important to someone else;
2. 6-item standardized measure of anxiety questionnaire;
3. after the genetic counseling session, clients were required to fill out a post session questionnaire
Control
Clients will be asked to rank artistic skills, athletics, business/money, creativity, independence, music, politics, relationships with friends and family, religious values, sense of humor, spontaneity from most important to least important. The control group will rank the list and be asked to write about the 9th ranked item and why it might be important to someone else.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Self Affirmation (SA)
Clients will be asked to rank artistic skills, athletics, business/money, creativity, independence, music, politics, relationships with friends and family, religious values, sense of humor, spontaneity from most important to least important. They will then be asked to write about the item that is most important to them and why it may be important to them.
Control
Clients will be asked to rank artistic skills, athletics, business/money, creativity, independence, music, politics, relationships with friends and family, religious values, sense of humor, spontaneity from most important to least important. The control group will rank the list and be asked to write about the 9th ranked item and why it might be important to someone else.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Must be female, at least 18 years old
* Have an initial appointment for genetic counseling for HBOC risk at St. Luke's Health System
* Must be able to read and write in English to participate
* Pregnant women will be included
Genetic Counselor (GC) Participants:
-Must be certified GCs who see clients with an indication for HBOC related genetic counseling at St. Luke's Health System
Exclusion Criteria
* Clients who are unable to provide consent will be excluded
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lori Erby, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Luke's Health System
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Scherr CL, Christie J, Vadaparampil ST. Breast Cancer Survivors' Knowledge of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer following Genetic Counseling: An Exploration of General and Survivor-Specific Knowledge Items. Public Health Genomics. 2016;19(1):1-10. doi: 10.1159/000439162. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
Kaphingst KA, Facio FM, Cheng MR, Brooks S, Eidem H, Linn A, Biesecker BB, Biesecker LG. Effects of informed consent for individual genome sequencing on relevant knowledge. Clin Genet. 2012 Nov;82(5):408-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01909.x. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
Harris PR, Napper L. Self-affirmation and the biased processing of threatening health-risk information. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Sep;31(9):1250-63. doi: 10.1177/0146167205274694.
Ferrer RA, Klein WM, Graff KA. Self-affirmation increases defensiveness toward health risk information among those experiencing negative emotions: Results from two national samples. Health Psychol. 2017 Apr;36(4):380-391. doi: 10.1037/hea0000460. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-HG-N132
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
999917132
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.