Improving Uptake of Genetic Cancer Risk Assessment in African American Women- Video
NCT ID: NCT04476654
Last Updated: 2024-10-22
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
57 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-11-01
2023-06-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Promoting Genetic Counseling Among African American Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer
NCT04378751
Uptake of Genetic Counseling Among African American Women
NCT04082117
Genetic Counseling in African American Women
NCT00419510
Enhancing At-risk Latina Women's Use of Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer
NCT03075540
Enhance the Use of Genetic Counseling and Testing in Latinas
NCT04544501
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Reasons for the lower uptake of GCT in Black women are multi-factorial and include access, knowledge, psycho-social factors, and may vary by cancer status (affected versus unaffected). There are substantial scientific gaps regarding effective interventions to address the sub-optimal uptake of GCT in Black women. To be effective, GCT interventions should be anchored within the needs and cultural values of their audience. While improving knowledge about GCT and one's individual risks is important, interventions that only address knowledge may not enhance uptake, as risk information evokes emotional reactions that are often stronger predictors of behaviors than cognitive factors.
Notably, this team has identified factors that contribute to Black women's uptake of GCT. In preliminary studies, researchers found that self-efficacy in making decisions about GCT and medical mistrust were associated with GCT uptake. Low knowledge among Black BC survivors at risk of HBOC has also been found. Anticipated negative emotions to GCT have been associated with lower uptake. Similar studies suggest that Black women report emotions related to fear of being singled out, and the fear of being hopeless. Because most interventions have focused solely on knowledge or access, the proposed study makes a considerable shift in the field by additionally targeting emotions, ambivalence, and developing a media-based risk communication tool.
Guided by two evidenced-based theories and preliminary data, this will be a two-phased mixed methods study. In Phase I (months 1-7), formative research and preliminary data will be used to develop the script for the GCT video. The script will be reviewed by GCT experts (n=4) and piloted in two focus groups (n=16) followed by a staged reading to make final refinements. In Phase II (months 8-24), a two-arm randomized trial (RCT) to compare GCT uptake and psycho-social outcomes between 50 at-risk Black women receiving printed Susan G. Komen developed GCT literature (control group) (n=25) or a tailored YouTube video intervention (n=25) will be conducted . All women will be referred to an appointment scheduler who will assist them with making an appointment with a genetic counselor. Participants will complete a baseline survey and follow-up assessment. The primary outcome will be genetic counseling uptake and receipt testing at 3-months will be explored. Specific aims are to:
Aim 1. Develop a YouTube video using a formative data for Black women at risk for HBOC.
Aim 2. Evaluate the efficacy of the intervention by comparing outcomes between women in the YouTube intervention arm vs. control group arm. H.2.1. Women in the intervention group (vs control group) will have higher genetic counseling uptake. H.2.2. Women in the intervention group (vs control group) will report higher knowledge, higher self-efficacy, higher endorsement of positive attitudes, and positive anticipated emotions about GCT. H.2.3. Most women (≥75%) will be satisfied with the experimental intervention.
Enhancing GCT in at-risk populations is a national priority. Given trends towards panel testing and other genomic advances, there is potential for existing disparities to widen. Findings will inform new strategies for behavioral interventions for Black women and a larger trial. If successful, the intervention could be easily disseminated broadening its reach to affected and unaffected women.
This study meets the Healthy People 2020 goals to enhance GRCA in at-risk populations, and the national priorities to increase diversity in genetics research participation and incorporate emotions into cancer research. Findings will inform new strategies for behavioral interventions targeting African-Americans in a larger trial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Fact Sheet Arm
Komen print materials about genetic counseling and testing will be given to women.
No interventions assigned to this group
YouTube Video Arm
Participants in this arm will receive the culturally tailored video either via a Youtube link or a DVD.
YouTube Video Arm
Participants (n=25) will watch a 20 minute YouTube video that will describe the genetic counseling and testing process and risk/benefit information in a culturally relevant format. Participants will complete pre and post assessments. After the session, participants interested in pursuing genetic counseling and testing services will be referred to a patient navigator who will navigate participants to identified no cost or low cost services.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
YouTube Video Arm
Participants (n=25) will watch a 20 minute YouTube video that will describe the genetic counseling and testing process and risk/benefit information in a culturally relevant format. Participants will complete pre and post assessments. After the session, participants interested in pursuing genetic counseling and testing services will be referred to a patient navigator who will navigate participants to identified no cost or low cost services.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Must be at high risk for hereditary breast or ovarian cancer
* Must identify as Black/African American
* Must be a woman
* Referred to a genetic counselor for the purpose of being high risk of carrying a hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer mutation
Genetic Counselors:
* Must be at least 18 years of age
* Must be qualified
* Must be approved by the PI
Exclusion Criteria
* Race other than Black/African American
* Do not gave a high risk for hereditary breast or ovarian cancer
Genetic Counselors:
* Under 18
* Not qualified
* Not approved by the PI
18 Years
100 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Virginia Commonwealth University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Vanessa Sheppard, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Virginia Commonwealth University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Massey Cancer Center
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HM20016234
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NCI-2019-04689
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
MCC-19-15167
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.