Does Deep Neuromuscular Blockade Improve Operating Conditions During Total Hip Replacements?

NCT ID: NCT03219294

Last Updated: 2019-09-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

116 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-01

Study Completion Date

2018-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

During many surgeries, increased muscle tension makes it harder for the surgeon to expose the site of surgery and work within the incision. Neuromuscular blockade (NMB) drugs such as Vecuronium bind to neurotransmitter (acetyl choline) receptors at the neuromuscular junction, blocking their action and producing muscle relaxation. This muscle relaxation allows easier retraction of muscle tissues and manipulation of structures in the wound. Improved surgical conditions are likely to result in improved patient outcomes. While increased depths of NMB have been shown to optimize surgical conditions during intra-abdominal and retroperitoneal procedures, the impact of NMB depth has not been reported for orthopedic surgeries.1 To address this, we propose to study the effect of NMB depth on surgical conditions during total hip replacement (THR).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Specific Aims

1. Assess difference in surgical conditions between moderate and deep NMB groups. Enrolled patients will be randomized to receive moderate (n=58) or deep (n=58) NMB. Difference in surgical conditions will be evaluated by:

1. The number of requests from the surgeon for additional relaxation (NMB) during the procedure. At any time during the operation if the surgeon feels the muscle tension is interfering with ease of operation he will ask for additional muscle relaxation. If the patient is moderately relaxed they will be converted to deep relaxation with additional muscle relaxants. If they are already deeply relaxed no additional relaxants will be administered (as is our current practice). All requests will be recorded.
2. Rating by the surgeon after each surgery using an internally developed satisfaction scale. The scale was developed by modifying a scale used in a previous study of muscle relaxation in intra-abdominal surgery1 to specify two key elements identified by our surgeon: ease of muscle retraction and femur manipulation.
2. Assess the impact of deep vs moderate NMB on time of surgery, measured from the time of incision to joint reduction.

SIGNIFICANCE If we identify improved surgical conditions with deeper relaxation we will incorporate deep NMB into our routine anesthesia practice for THR.

Vecuronium will be used as NMB drug in all study patients; this agent is currently used in over 90% of THR cases at Maine Medical Center (MMC). As is currently routine Vecuronium will be given after initiation of general anesthesia with propofol to facilitate intubation and further doses of Vecuronium will be given throughout the case as noted below to maintain NMB at the desired depth until the femoral implant is reduced. After the intubating dose of Vecuronium, NMB depth will be monitored every 5 minutes and dosing will be adjusted as needed to maintain a constant depth of NMB according to our current routine practice.

Group 1: Moderate NMB: Intubating dose of Vecuronium of 0.1 mg/kg (IBW) and re-dosing with 0.0125 to 0.05 mg/kg as needed to achieve and maintain 1 to 2 train of four (TOF) contractions. Redosing in this manner is a current clinical practice.

Group 2: Deep NMB: Intubating dose of Vecuronium of 0.2 mg/kg (IBW) and re-dosing with 0.025 to 0.1 mg/kg to achieve and maintain zero twitches in the TOF, and post tetanic count (PTC) of 1 to 2 contractions. This level of blockade is new to the practice since approval of the drug for use at MMC but is in common use since the advent of Sugammadex.

The surgeon may request additional relaxation at anytime for inadequate surgical conditions thought to be related to muscle tension. All requests will be recorded. Patients in the moderate NMB group will receive additional doses of vecuronium to achieve deep NMB (PTC of 1- 2). In the deep NMB group with PTC of 1-2, a saline dose without NMB will be given.

NMB reversal Sugammadex will be given for reversal of NMB after the prosthesis has been reduced, using routine dosing of 2 mg/kg for the moderate group and 4 mg/kg for the deep group, per package insert by Merck.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arthropathy of Hip

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
The anesthesiologist will NOT be blinded, but the orthopedic surgeon performing the hip replacement surgery will be.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade (NMB)

Intubating dose of Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg (IBW) and re-dosing with 0.0125 to 0.05 mg/kg as needed to achieve and maintain 1 to 2 train-of-four (TOF) contractions. Redosing in this manner is a current clinical practice.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Vecuronium will be administered to achieve and maintain 1 to 2 TOF contractions.

Deep NMB

Deep NMB: Intubating dose of Vecuronium 0.2 mg/kg (IBW) and re-dosing with 0.025 to 0.1 mg/kg to achieve and maintain zero twitches in the TOF, and post tetanic count (PTC) of 1 to 2 contractions. This level of blockade is new to the practice since approval of the drug for use at Maine Medical Center (MMC) but is in common use since the advent of Sugammadex.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vecuronium 0.2mg/kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Vecuronium will be administered to achieve and 0 TOF/PTC 1-2.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg

Vecuronium will be administered to achieve and maintain 1 to 2 TOF contractions.

Intervention Type DRUG

Vecuronium 0.2mg/kg

Vecuronium will be administered to achieve and 0 TOF/PTC 1-2.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

vecuronium bromide vecuronium bromide

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical status 1-3
* age 50-75
* English speaking
* able to provide informed consent
* BMI equal to less than 30
* non-emergent THR by anterolateral minimally invasive non-cemented total hip arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria

* Revision surgery
* Bilateral THR
* ASA 4+
* age less than 50 or greater than 75
* BMI greater than 30
* unable to provide informed consent
* women taking oral contraceptives (Sugammadex used for reversal interferes with their efficacy
* contraindications to general inhalation anesthesia (such as malignant hyperthermia)
* contraindications to NMB (known allergy to NMB)
* chronic kidney disease
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

MaineHealth

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Spectrum Medical Group Anesthesiology

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Craig Curry

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Craig Curry

Anesthesiologist

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Craig Curry, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maine Medical Center/Spectrum Medical Group

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Maine Medical Center

Portland, Maine, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Basad E, Ishaque B, Sturz H, Jerosch J. The anterolateral minimally invasive approach for total hip arthroplasty: technique, pitfalls, and way out. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009 Oct;40(4):473-8, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.05.001.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19773052 (View on PubMed)

Brueckmann B, Sasaki N, Grobara P, Li MK, Woo T, de Bie J, Maktabi M, Lee J, Kwo J, Pino R, Sabouri AS, McGovern F, Staehr-Rye AK, Eikermann M. Effects of sugammadex on incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a randomized, controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;115(5):743-51. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev104. Epub 2015 May 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25935840 (View on PubMed)

Madsen MV, Staehr-Rye AK, Gatke MR, Claudius C. Neuromuscular blockade for optimising surgical conditions during abdominal and gynaecological surgery: a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Jan;59(1):1-16. doi: 10.1111/aas.12419. Epub 2014 Oct 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25328055 (View on PubMed)

Paton F, Paulden M, Chambers D, Heirs M, Duffy S, Hunter JM, Sculpher M, Woolacott N. Sugammadex compared with neostigmine/glycopyrrolate for routine reversal of neuromuscular block: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Nov;105(5):558-67. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq269. Epub 2010 Oct 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20935005 (View on PubMed)

Chambers D, Paulden M, Paton F, Heirs M, Duffy S, Craig D, Hunter J, Wilson J, Sculpher M, Woolacott N. Sugammadex for the reversal of muscle relaxation in general anaesthesia: a systematic review and economic assessment. Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jul;14(39):1-211. doi: 10.3310/hta14390.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20688009 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

988210-2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.