Does Deep Neuromuscular Blockade Improve Operating Conditions During Total Hip Replacements?
NCT ID: NCT03219294
Last Updated: 2019-09-18
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
116 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-05-01
2018-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Can we Antagonize Mivacurium With Neostigmine ?
NCT03019835
Regional Anesthesia in Hip Arthroscopy
NCT02674113
Impact of Deep Neuromuscular Blockade During Total Hip Replacement Surgery on Postoperative Recovery and Immune Function
NCT05562999
Ultrasound-Guided Obturator Nerve Block for Ambulatory Hip Arthroscopy
NCT02346357
Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade With Sugammadex or Usual Care in Hip Fracture Surgery or Joint (Hip/Knee) Replacement (P07038)
NCT01422304
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Assess difference in surgical conditions between moderate and deep NMB groups. Enrolled patients will be randomized to receive moderate (n=58) or deep (n=58) NMB. Difference in surgical conditions will be evaluated by:
1. The number of requests from the surgeon for additional relaxation (NMB) during the procedure. At any time during the operation if the surgeon feels the muscle tension is interfering with ease of operation he will ask for additional muscle relaxation. If the patient is moderately relaxed they will be converted to deep relaxation with additional muscle relaxants. If they are already deeply relaxed no additional relaxants will be administered (as is our current practice). All requests will be recorded.
2. Rating by the surgeon after each surgery using an internally developed satisfaction scale. The scale was developed by modifying a scale used in a previous study of muscle relaxation in intra-abdominal surgery1 to specify two key elements identified by our surgeon: ease of muscle retraction and femur manipulation.
2. Assess the impact of deep vs moderate NMB on time of surgery, measured from the time of incision to joint reduction.
SIGNIFICANCE If we identify improved surgical conditions with deeper relaxation we will incorporate deep NMB into our routine anesthesia practice for THR.
Vecuronium will be used as NMB drug in all study patients; this agent is currently used in over 90% of THR cases at Maine Medical Center (MMC). As is currently routine Vecuronium will be given after initiation of general anesthesia with propofol to facilitate intubation and further doses of Vecuronium will be given throughout the case as noted below to maintain NMB at the desired depth until the femoral implant is reduced. After the intubating dose of Vecuronium, NMB depth will be monitored every 5 minutes and dosing will be adjusted as needed to maintain a constant depth of NMB according to our current routine practice.
Group 1: Moderate NMB: Intubating dose of Vecuronium of 0.1 mg/kg (IBW) and re-dosing with 0.0125 to 0.05 mg/kg as needed to achieve and maintain 1 to 2 train of four (TOF) contractions. Redosing in this manner is a current clinical practice.
Group 2: Deep NMB: Intubating dose of Vecuronium of 0.2 mg/kg (IBW) and re-dosing with 0.025 to 0.1 mg/kg to achieve and maintain zero twitches in the TOF, and post tetanic count (PTC) of 1 to 2 contractions. This level of blockade is new to the practice since approval of the drug for use at MMC but is in common use since the advent of Sugammadex.
The surgeon may request additional relaxation at anytime for inadequate surgical conditions thought to be related to muscle tension. All requests will be recorded. Patients in the moderate NMB group will receive additional doses of vecuronium to achieve deep NMB (PTC of 1- 2). In the deep NMB group with PTC of 1-2, a saline dose without NMB will be given.
NMB reversal Sugammadex will be given for reversal of NMB after the prosthesis has been reduced, using routine dosing of 2 mg/kg for the moderate group and 4 mg/kg for the deep group, per package insert by Merck.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade (NMB)
Intubating dose of Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg (IBW) and re-dosing with 0.0125 to 0.05 mg/kg as needed to achieve and maintain 1 to 2 train-of-four (TOF) contractions. Redosing in this manner is a current clinical practice.
Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg
Vecuronium will be administered to achieve and maintain 1 to 2 TOF contractions.
Deep NMB
Deep NMB: Intubating dose of Vecuronium 0.2 mg/kg (IBW) and re-dosing with 0.025 to 0.1 mg/kg to achieve and maintain zero twitches in the TOF, and post tetanic count (PTC) of 1 to 2 contractions. This level of blockade is new to the practice since approval of the drug for use at Maine Medical Center (MMC) but is in common use since the advent of Sugammadex.
Vecuronium 0.2mg/kg
Vecuronium will be administered to achieve and 0 TOF/PTC 1-2.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg
Vecuronium will be administered to achieve and maintain 1 to 2 TOF contractions.
Vecuronium 0.2mg/kg
Vecuronium will be administered to achieve and 0 TOF/PTC 1-2.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age 50-75
* English speaking
* able to provide informed consent
* BMI equal to less than 30
* non-emergent THR by anterolateral minimally invasive non-cemented total hip arthroplasty
Exclusion Criteria
* Bilateral THR
* ASA 4+
* age less than 50 or greater than 75
* BMI greater than 30
* unable to provide informed consent
* women taking oral contraceptives (Sugammadex used for reversal interferes with their efficacy
* contraindications to general inhalation anesthesia (such as malignant hyperthermia)
* contraindications to NMB (known allergy to NMB)
* chronic kidney disease
50 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
MaineHealth
OTHER
Spectrum Medical Group Anesthesiology
OTHER
Craig Curry
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Craig Curry
Anesthesiologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Craig Curry, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maine Medical Center/Spectrum Medical Group
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Maine Medical Center
Portland, Maine, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Basad E, Ishaque B, Sturz H, Jerosch J. The anterolateral minimally invasive approach for total hip arthroplasty: technique, pitfalls, and way out. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009 Oct;40(4):473-8, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.05.001.
Brueckmann B, Sasaki N, Grobara P, Li MK, Woo T, de Bie J, Maktabi M, Lee J, Kwo J, Pino R, Sabouri AS, McGovern F, Staehr-Rye AK, Eikermann M. Effects of sugammadex on incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a randomized, controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;115(5):743-51. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev104. Epub 2015 May 2.
Madsen MV, Staehr-Rye AK, Gatke MR, Claudius C. Neuromuscular blockade for optimising surgical conditions during abdominal and gynaecological surgery: a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Jan;59(1):1-16. doi: 10.1111/aas.12419. Epub 2014 Oct 19.
Paton F, Paulden M, Chambers D, Heirs M, Duffy S, Hunter JM, Sculpher M, Woolacott N. Sugammadex compared with neostigmine/glycopyrrolate for routine reversal of neuromuscular block: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Nov;105(5):558-67. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq269. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
Chambers D, Paulden M, Paton F, Heirs M, Duffy S, Craig D, Hunter J, Wilson J, Sculpher M, Woolacott N. Sugammadex for the reversal of muscle relaxation in general anaesthesia: a systematic review and economic assessment. Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jul;14(39):1-211. doi: 10.3310/hta14390.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
988210-2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.