Cranioplasty: Autogenous Bone Graft Versus Artificial Substitutes
NCT ID: NCT03218150
Last Updated: 2017-07-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
1 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-10-31
2018-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The project's aim is long term follow up of patient's having skull bone defects due to traumatic or lesion resection causes, treated , in standard clinical practice, with autologous bone graft , bone cement or titanium mesh and to compare the clinical outcome and safety among the 3 types of treatment.
Eligibility to each treatment will respect the standard clinical practice.
Primary outcome: minimize post operative infection
Secondary outcomes: decrease operation time , clinical and psychological improvement of the patient, decrease the cost on the patient
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Controlled Study in Cranioplasty Reconstruction
NCT01641523
Cranioplasty Using Titanium Mesh Vs Bone Cement
NCT06662903
Computer Based Algorithm for Patient Specific Implants for Cranioplasty in Patients With Skull Defects
NCT02828306
Comparative Study Between Porcine and Autologous Cortical Plates
NCT04205591
Bone Reconstruction of the Skull Using a Metal Ceramic Implant After Previously Failed Reconstruction
NCT01899807
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Autologous bone grafts remain the best option for adult and pediatric patients with viable donor sites and small-to-medium defects. Large defects in the adult population can be reconstructed with titanium mesh and polymethylmethacrylate overlay with or without the use of computer-assisted design and manufacturing customization. Advances in alloplastic materials and custom manufacturing of implants will have an important influence on cranioplasty techniques in the years to come.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
bone cement group
patient underwent to cranioplasty reconstruction with customized hydroxyapatite prosthesis
cranioplasty
. The margins of the craniectomy defects exposed, and the bone flaps fixed in their original positions using wires or titanium plates with screws. As prophylaxis, all patients intravenously administered with pre- and postoperative antibiotics.
In cases of artificial substitutes , The polymethyemethacrylate implant fixed to the defective region with titanium plates and self-tapping screws.
titanium mesh group
patient underwent to cranioplasty reconstruction with titanium mesh
cranioplasty
. The margins of the craniectomy defects exposed, and the bone flaps fixed in their original positions using wires or titanium plates with screws. As prophylaxis, all patients intravenously administered with pre- and postoperative antibiotics.
In cases of artificial substitutes , The polymethyemethacrylate implant fixed to the defective region with titanium plates and self-tapping screws.
autologous bone group
patient underwent to cranioplasty reconstruction with autologous bone graft
cranioplasty
. The margins of the craniectomy defects exposed, and the bone flaps fixed in their original positions using wires or titanium plates with screws. As prophylaxis, all patients intravenously administered with pre- and postoperative antibiotics.
In cases of artificial substitutes , The polymethyemethacrylate implant fixed to the defective region with titanium plates and self-tapping screws.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cranioplasty
. The margins of the craniectomy defects exposed, and the bone flaps fixed in their original positions using wires or titanium plates with screws. As prophylaxis, all patients intravenously administered with pre- and postoperative antibiotics.
In cases of artificial substitutes , The polymethyemethacrylate implant fixed to the defective region with titanium plates and self-tapping screws.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age older than 10 and less than 60 years
3. Provided written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Severe disease with limited life expectancy of less than one year
10 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alaeddin Mohamed Ali
resident doctor
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Assiut cranioplasty
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.