Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Measures in Arthritic Patients With Osteoporosis

NCT ID: NCT03217513

Last Updated: 2019-10-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to generate proof of concept human data by evaluating osteoarthritis outcome measures in arthritic patients that are prescribed Forteo® as the standard of care to treat their primary diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The traditional treatment paradigm for osteoarthritis (OA) involves palliative strategies focused on pain management and joint replacement. The longstanding inability to develop disease-modifying therapies that can rejuvenate joint cartilage is a great unmet need considering that diarthrodial and spinal OA is the most prevalent disease in the US, equal in numbers to the next top 4 disorders combined (heart, pulmonary, mental health and diabetic conditions) (CDC, 2009). Thus, the development of an effective remittive treatment for OA is a vital public health initiative with potential for tremendous impact. Our long-term research objective is to test a radically different strategy for treatment of OA that is based on findings recently published in Science Translational Medicine (Sampson et al., 2011) that identified human parathyroid hormone1-34 (teriparatide) as a chondroregenerative agent in a murine model of OA. Suggesting a parallel effect in human OA, data mined from the NIH-sponsored OA Initiative revealed improved WOMAC knee function scores in arthritic subjects coincidentally prescribed teriparatide (trade name: Forteo®) to treat osteoporosis. These preclinical and human data provide compelling rationale to study Forteo® as a novel OA therapy directed at improving joint structure and function. The central aim of our overall research program is to challenge the paradigm that cartilage loss in OA is irreversible. Thus, our long-term programmatic goal is to test Forteo® as the first and only disease-modifying treatment for OA with potential to rapidly impact clinical care. To achieve this, we have been developing a clinical trial where subjects with medial compartment Kellgren Lawrence (K-L) stage II-III knee OA will receive either Forteo® or Prolia® (a brand of denosumab) for two years. Disease progression will be assessed via structural, biomarker and functional outcomes at various time points out to 24 months post-initiation of therapy. Since Forteo® is a widely used therapeutic in patients with osteoporosis (OP)-related severe bone loss, we propose to examine OA outcomes in OP patients with concomitant knee OA. This pilot study described here that tests the hypothesis that patients with unilateral or bilateral knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade II-III) that are prescribed Forteo® to treat their primary diagnosis of OP will demonstrate improved physical function (Timed-Up-And-Go), improved patient-reported outcomes (PROMIS 12a, v1.0), and increased blood levels in the cartilage anabolic marker type II collagen C-propeptide. Completion of this proposed experimental design would provide critical proof-of-concept preliminary data supporting the use of biomarkers, physical function testing and questionnaire-based functional assessment to study OA in patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoporosis Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Forteo

teriparatide 20-microgram once daily available in a 2.4-mL delivery device for subcutaneous injection by the patient

No interventions assigned to this group

Prolia

denosumab 60 mg administered as a single subcutaneous injection every 6 months by the health care provider

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age: 40-80 years (inclusive)
* Gender: male or female (non-pregnant)
* Fluent in written and spoken English
* Patients capable of giving informed consent
* Primary diagnosis of osteoporosis that will be treated with either Forteo® to induce bone anabolism or Prolia® by the study investigator as part of patient's standard of care treatment
* Symptomatic, medial compartment knee OA with a Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) score between II-III (documented in the medical record by previously collected knee series radiography). Radiographs to be performed within past two years.

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 40 or \>80 years
* Cognitive impairment
* Pregnancy
* Non-English speaking persons
* History of hyperparathyroidism, hypercalcemia, current/recent renal stones, or malignancy
* Depression (currently taking home medication)
* History of inflammatory disease (colitis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, lupus, scleroderma, spondylitis)
* Use of immunosuppressants, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy
* BMI, angular deformity and K-L score of the contralateral knee (if the OA is bilateral) will be noted as covariates
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Edward Fox

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Edward Fox

Principal Investigator/Sponsor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Edward J Fox, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Aletaha D. From the item to the outcome: the promising prospects of PROMIS. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(1):104. doi: 10.1186/ar2910. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20156319 (View on PubMed)

Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Vondechend M, Bellamy N, Theiler R. Validation and patient acceptance of a computer touch screen version of the WOMAC 3.1 osteoarthritis index. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Jan;64(1):80-4. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.019307. Epub 2004 Jul 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15231508 (View on PubMed)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults--United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 May 1;58(16):421-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19407734 (View on PubMed)

Fries JF, Krishnan E, Rose M, Lingala B, Bruce B. Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(5):R147. doi: 10.1186/ar3461. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21914216 (View on PubMed)

Sampson ER, Hilton MJ, Tian Y, Chen D, Schwarz EM, Mooney RA, Bukata SV, O'Keefe RJ, Awad H, Puzas JE, Rosier RN, Zuscik MJ. Teriparatide as a chondroregenerative therapy for injury-induced osteoarthritis. Sci Transl Med. 2011 Sep 21;3(101):101ra93. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002214.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21937758 (View on PubMed)

Brostrom EW, Esbjornsson AC, von Heideken J, Iversen MD. Gait deviations in individuals with inflammatory joint diseases and osteoarthritis and the usage of three-dimensional gait analysis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Jun;26(3):409-22. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2012.05.007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22867935 (View on PubMed)

Kraus VB, Feng S, Wang S, White S, Ainslie M, Brett A, Holmes A, Charles HC. Trabecular morphometry by fractal signature analysis is a novel marker of osteoarthritis progression. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Dec;60(12):3711-22. doi: 10.1002/art.25012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19950282 (View on PubMed)

Garnero P, Thompson E, Woodworth T, Smolen JS. Rapid and sustained improvement in bone and cartilage turnover markers with the anti-interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor tocilizumab plus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate: results from a substudy of the multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of tocilizumab in inadequate responders to methotrexate alone. Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Jan;62(1):33-43. doi: 10.1002/art.25053.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20039425 (View on PubMed)

Hashimoto J, Garnero P, van der Heijde D, Miyasaka N, Yamamoto K, Kawai S, Takeuchi T, Yoshikawa H, Nishimoto N. A combination of biochemical markers of cartilage and bone turnover, radiographic damage and body mass index to predict the progression of joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Mod Rheumatol. 2009;19(3):273-82. doi: 10.1007/s10165-009-0170-4. Epub 2009 May 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19452245 (View on PubMed)

Maksymowych WP, Poole AR, Hiebert L, Webb A, Ionescu M, Lobanok T, King L, Davis JC Jr. Etanercept exerts beneficial effects on articular cartilage biomarkers of degradation and turnover in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2005 Oct;32(10):1911-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16206346 (View on PubMed)

Papuga MO, Beck CA, Kates SL, Schwarz EM, Maloney MD. Validation of GAITRite and PROMIS as high-throughput physical function outcome measures following ACL reconstruction. J Orthop Res. 2014 Jun;32(6):793-801. doi: 10.1002/jor.22591. Epub 2014 Feb 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24532421 (View on PubMed)

Taylor ME, Delbaere K, Mikolaizak AS, Lord SR, Close JC. Gait parameter risk factors for falls under simple and dual task conditions in cognitively impaired older people. Gait Posture. 2013 Jan;37(1):126-30. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.06.024. Epub 2012 Jul 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22832468 (View on PubMed)

Debi R, Mor A, Segal G, Segal O, Agar G, Debbi E, Halperin N, Haim A, Elbaz A. Correlation between single limb support phase and self-evaluation questionnaires in knee osteoarthritis populations. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(13-14):1103-9. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.520805. Epub 2011 Jan 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21208029 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY00004918

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cemented vs Cementless Persona Keel RCT
NCT05630053 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Chronic Knee Pain Study
NCT00776932 COMPLETED