Apixaban For Thromboprophylaxis In Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury
NCT ID: NCT03200613
Last Updated: 2020-02-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
8 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-09-01
2019-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prevention of Thromboembolism Using Apixaban vs Enoxaparin Following Spinal Cord Injury
NCT05484557
Comparison of the Effects of Apixaban on Thrombin Generation in Patients With de Novo Multiple Myeloma
NCT06474182
Oral Direct Factor Xa-inhibitor Apixaban in Patients With Acute Symptomatic Deep-vein Thrombosis-The Botticelli DVT Study
NCT00252005
Efficacy and Safety of Low-molecular Weight Heparin for Thromboprophylaxis in Acutely Ill Medical Patients
NCT00311753
Study of Apixaban for the Prevention of Thrombosis-related Events in Patients With Acute Medical Illness
NCT00457002
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
We will perform a pilot study at Hamilton General on apixaban versus LMWH for thromboprophylaxis in patients with acute SCI. Upon providing written informed consent, eligible patients will be randomized to apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily or LMWH, either enoxaparin 40 mg or dalteparin 5000 units, subcutaneously once daily for 90 days or until fully mobilized, whatever comes first.
The primary outcome for the feasibility study will be the recruitment rate per year (i.e. the screened to enrolled ratio). Other key feasibility measures will be accrual ratio, protocol violations pertaining to eligibility criteria and randomization procedures, retention rate for primary end-point assessment at 1 year, and the estimates of endpoint rates in the population. The primary efficacy endpoint will be a composite of symptomatic, objectively verified VTE (upper or lower limb DVT and/or PE) or sudden death where PE cannot be excluded. The primary safety endpoint will be major bleeding.
This will be the first study comparing the use of LMWH against a DOAC in SCI patients. Use of a DOAC such as apixaban can eliminate the burden associated with daily injections for the patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Apixaban
Apixaban 2.5 mg orally twice daily
Apixaban
2.5 mg orally twice daily
Low Molecular Weight Heparin
Either enoxaparin 40 mg or dalteparin 5000 units subcutaneously once daily
Low molecular weight heparin
Dalteparin 5000 units daily or Enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneous daily
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Apixaban
2.5 mg orally twice daily
Low molecular weight heparin
Dalteparin 5000 units daily or Enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneous daily
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Traumatic SCI
* SCI with or without other injuries
Exclusion Criteria
* Active bleeding, intracranial or perispinal hematoma, or acquired or congenital bleeding disorder
* Pregnancy or breast feeding
* Severe renal failure (creatinine clearance ≤30 ml/min)
* Liver cirrhosis
* Severe thrombocytopenia (platelets \<50)
* Attending physician believes that the patient is not suitable for the study (for example, psychiatric disorder; history of non-compliance)
* Geographic inaccessibility: planned transfer to other site where follow-up not possible
* Failure to obtain written consent
* Previous hypersensitivity reaction to study drugs
* Patients with expected short hospital admission (≤7 days) due to minor injury
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
McMaster University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sam Schulman
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hamilton General Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Piran S, Schulman S. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism in patients with acute spinal cord injury: A retrospective study. Thromb Res. 2016 Nov;147:97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.09.030. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
Piran S, Schulman S. Thromboprophylaxis in Patients with Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Narrative Review. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2019 Mar;45(2):150-156. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1678720. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SCI Pilot RCT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.