Ultrasound Assessment of Volume in Patients on Continuous Dialysis
NCT ID: NCT03194750
Last Updated: 2023-09-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
6 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-06-01
2023-09-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The current standard of care for adjusting fluid removal rates in patients on continuous renal replacement therapy relies on clinical judgement. Clinicians take into account factors like the patient's condition, vasopressor requirements, kidney function, total intake and outputs, vital signs, and physical examination findings when making daily changes to fluid removal rates on dialysis machines. Such assessment is highly subjective and can be imprecise/inaccurate leading to hypotension and hemodynamic instability in a critically ill patient.
Use of conventional ultrasound by physicians to assess volume status using compressibility of the inferior vena cava has been shown to be a reliable predictor of volume status and can help guide therapy. Such use makes bedside volume assessment a non-invasive, rapid, repeatable point of care tool that can provide objective data to guide fluid removal determine velocity of fluid removal and help identify patients at risk of hypotension and hemodynamic instability during the process of fluid removal. Apart from rare possible local allergic reactions to ultrasound jelly and transient local discomfort, the disadvantages are minimal. Ultrasonography has been considered a safe imaging modality. This protocol will measure inferior vena cava compressibility using the General Electric VScan with Dual Probe, which has FDA approval for abdominal and vascular imaging in humans.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasound Markers of Organ Congestion in Severe Acute Kidney Injury
NCT04095143
The Predictive Performance of Renal Ultrasound on Changes in Renal Clearance
NCT04198168
Lung Ultrasound Assessment of Fluid Overload in Haemodialysis Patients
NCT05132036
Ultrasound to Evaluate Acute Kidney Injury
NCT06241417
Evaluation of Renal Blood Flow Using Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound for Differential Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury in Cirrhotic Patients: A Pilot Study
NCT02147470
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
At the start of the study, participants will be randomized to two groups. Study activities are identical between the two groups and both groups receive ultrasound measurements on the abdomen. However, in one group the attending nephrologist on the Acute Consult service will be provided with inferior vena cava compressibility measurement information each day before the start of rounds. Randomization will follow a predefined schedule, known only to the research coordinator, Laura Latta. At no time will the attending physicians receive the ultrasound measurements for the group randomized to not have their data shared.
In addition, the resident, fellow, and attending on the Acute Consult service will be asked to assess the volume status of each participant at the start of the study and then daily for next 3 days. The volume assessment will consist of answering the following question, "Would you recommend fluid removal in this patient today (Yes/No/Unsure)?" The question will be asked verbally by Dr. Narasimha Krishna. Each individual's level of training (post-graduation year) and the response will be recorded. Individual names will not be recorded and responses will not be shared with the attending. Responses to this question are not anticipated to affect management of the participant.
During the follow up phase, the electronic medical records will be checked at day 7 and day 30 to determine if the participant is still in the intensive care unit, is still on the ventilator, or is still alive, or still in the hospital. Both groups will have the same follow up time.
Primary outcome measures include: 1) Time to extubation; 2) Length of ICU stay; 3) Length of hospital stay; and 4) 30 day mortality.
Secondary outcome measures include: 1) Difference in net fluid removal by CRRT at day 3 between the 2 groups; 2) Agreement between volume assessment and inferior vena cava compressibility by level of training.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Share Data
Share ultrasound measurement of IVC collapsibility to Nephrology Attending
Nephrology attending will be provided with the respiratory variability of IVC diameter as a percent, in addition to a predefined cutoff for responsiveness to volume resuscitation of \< 12%. The information will be provided before rounds and before the attending sets the fluid removal goals on dialysis for that day.
Do Not Share Data
Do not share ultrasound measurement of IVC collapsibility to Nephrology Attending
Respiratory variability of IVC diameter will be measured, but the measurement result will not be shared with the treating team.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Share ultrasound measurement of IVC collapsibility to Nephrology Attending
Nephrology attending will be provided with the respiratory variability of IVC diameter as a percent, in addition to a predefined cutoff for responsiveness to volume resuscitation of \< 12%. The information will be provided before rounds and before the attending sets the fluid removal goals on dialysis for that day.
Do not share ultrasound measurement of IVC collapsibility to Nephrology Attending
Respiratory variability of IVC diameter will be measured, but the measurement result will not be shared with the treating team.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnant woman
* abdominal surgery interfering with placement of ultrasound probe
* end-stage kidney disease
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Eric Judd
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eric Judd, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UAB University Hospital
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
F160407004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.