Bridging Thrombolysis Versus Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT ID: NCT03192332
Last Updated: 2024-11-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
410 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-11-29
2021-08-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main objective is to determine whether subjects experiencing an AIS due to large intracranial vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation will have non-inferior functional outcome at 90 days when treated with direct mechanical thrombectomy (MT) compared to subjects treated with combined IV t-PA and MT.
The secondary objectives are to study causes of mortality, dependency and quality of life in these AIS patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Solitaire™ With the Intention For Thrombectomy as PRIMary Endovascular Treatment (SWIFT PRIME) Trial
NCT01657461
Thrombectomy Under Reopro Versus Alteplase to Treat Stoke
NCT02016547
Intra-arterial Recombinant Human Tenecteplase Tissue-type Plasminogen Activator (rhTNK-tPA) Thrombolysis for Acute Medium Vessel Occlusion
NCT07302854
Local Versus Systemic Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke (SYNTHESIS)
NCT00540527
Feasibility Study of IV Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator (rtPA) vs. Primary Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT01869478
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
No randomized controlled trial has ever assessed whether direct MT in patients with AIS is equally effective as MT in combination with IV t-PA (bridging thrombolysis). In a patient-level pooled analysis of five randomized controlled studies (HERMES collaboration) similar rates of functional independence and mortality at 90 days were observed between patients who received IV t-PA+MT and those who received direct MT. However, patients in the direct MT group had contraindications for IV t-PA. Two larger studies based on registries compared the outcome of patients after bridging thrombolysis with direct MT in patients eligible for IV t-PA. In both studies, the outcome of patients after bridging thrombolysis and direct MT was similar. For these reasons the investigators hypothesize that immediate and direct MT is not inferior and might even be superior to bridging thrombolysis in patients directly referred to a stroke center with rapid access to endovascular procedures.
In this trial all commercially available stent-retriever revascularization devices manufactured by Medtronic (e.g. Solitaire™) will be used as tool for direct MT. The investigators aim to provide conclusive information on the efficacy and safety of direct MT, in comparison with bridging thrombolysis.
If direct MT in patients with AIS would not be inferior to bridging thrombolysis, the organization of acute stroke management would change essentially. Direct MT would then be the therapy of choice in stroke centers with endovascular facilities. Furthermore, this trial could have an impact on healthcare guidelines and costs. However, this trial does not address the question, whether patients arriving in stroke units with no endovascular facilities should be pre-treated with IV t-PA or whether they should directly be referred to stroke centers with endovascular facilities.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Direct mechanical thrombectomy
Treatment with direct mechanical thrombectomy with a commercially available stent-retriever revascularization device of the Solitaire™ type.
Stent-retriever thrombectomy with revascularization device of the Solitaire™ type
Mechanical thrombectomy with a stent-retriever revascularization device
Combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy
Treatment with intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (IV t-PA) followed by mechanical thrombectomy with a commercially available stent-retriever revascularization device of the Solitaire™ type.
Stent-retriever thrombectomy with revascularization device of the Solitaire™ type
Mechanical thrombectomy with a stent-retriever revascularization device
Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (IV t-PA)
Bridging thrombolysis (IV t-PA plus mechanical thrombectomy) according to current European and North American stroke guidelines.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Stent-retriever thrombectomy with revascularization device of the Solitaire™ type
Mechanical thrombectomy with a stent-retriever revascularization device
Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (IV t-PA)
Bridging thrombolysis (IV t-PA plus mechanical thrombectomy) according to current European and North American stroke guidelines.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age ≥ 18
3. Clinical signs consistent with an acute ischemic stroke
4. Neurological deficit with a NIHSS of ≥ 5 and \< 30 (deficits judged to be clearly disabling at presentation)
5. Patient is eligible for intravenous thrombolysis
6. Patient is eligible for endovascular treatment
7. Randomization no later than 4 hours 15 minutes after stroke symptom onset and initiation of IV t-PA must be started within 4 hours 30 minutes of stroke symptoms onset (onset time is measured from the time when the subject was last seen well)
8. Occlusion (TICI 0-1) of the intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA), the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), or both confirmed by CT or MR angiography, accessible for MT
9. Core-infarct volume of Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) greater than or equal to 4 (≥ 4) based on baseline CT or MR imaging (MRI) (a region has to have diffusion abnormality in 20% or more of its volume to be considered MR-ASPECTS positive)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Any contraindication for IV t-PA
3. Pre-treatment with IV t-PA
4. In-hospital stroke
5. Pregnancy or lactating women. A negative pregnancy test before randomization is required for all women with child-bearing potential.
6. Known (serious) sensitivity to radiographic contrast agents, nickel, titanium metals, or their alloys
7. Known current participation in a clinical trial (investigational drug or medical device)
8. Renal insufficiency as defined by a serum creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dl (or 176.8 µmol/l) or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 30 mL/min or requirement for hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis
9. Severe comorbid condition with life expectancy less than 90 days at baseline
10. Known advanced dementia or significant pre-stroke disability (mRS score of ≥2)
11. Foreseeable difficulties in follow-up due to geographic reasons (e.g. patients living abroad)
12. Comorbid disease or condition that would confound the neurological and functional evaluations or compromise survival or ability to complete follow-up assessments.
13. Subject currently uses or has a recent history of illicit drug(s) or abuses alcohol (defined as regular or daily consumption of more than four alcoholic drinks per day).
14. Known history of arterial tortuosity, pre-existing stent, other arterial disease and/or known disease at the femoral access site that would prevent the device from reaching the target vessel and/or preclude safe recovery after MT
15. Radiological confirmed evidence of mass effect or intracranial tumor (except small meningioma)
16. Radiological confirmed evidence of cerebral vasculitis
17. CTA or MRA evidence of carotid artery dissection
18. Evidence of additional distal intracranial vessel occlusion in another territory (i.e. A2 segment of anterior cerebral artery or M3, M4 segment of MCA) on initial NCCT/MRI or CTA/MRA
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic
INDUSTRY
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Urs Fischer, Prof. Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dept. of Neurology, Inselspital Bern
Jan Gralla, Prof. Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dept. of Neuroradiology, Inselspital Bern
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Keppler Universitätsklinikum
Linz, Upper Austria, Austria
Medical University of Innsbruck
Innsbruck, , Austria
University of Calgary, Alberta Health Services
Calgary, , Canada
Mc Gill University
Montreal, , Canada
Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan
Saskatoon, , Canada
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, , Canada
Helsinki University Hospital
Helsinki, , Finland
Hôpital Cavale Blanche CHU Brest
Brest, Finistère, France
CHU de Reims
Reims, Marne, France
CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, Puy-de-Dôme, France
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, , France
CHU de Caen Normandie
Caen, , France
CHU de Lille
Lille, , France
CHU de Limoges
Limoges, , France
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lyon, , France
CHU de Montpellier
Montpellier, , France
CHRU Nancy
Nancy, , France
CHU de Nantes
Nantes, , France
Hôpital Bicêtre
Paris, , France
GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Sainte Anne
Paris, , France
Fondation Ophtalmologique A. de Rothschild
Paris, , France
CHU Rouen Normandie
Rouen, , France
CHRU Strasbourg
Strasbourg, , France
CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, , France
CHU Tours
Tours, , France
Hôpital Foch
Suresnes, Île-de-France Region, France
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Universität Heidelber
Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Klinikum Osnabrück GmbH
Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, Germany
Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen
Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus GmbH Bochum
Bochum, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
Frankfurt, , Germany
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
Göttingen, , Germany
Medizinische Fakultät der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
Magdeburg, , Germany
Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
München, , Germany
Klinikum Vest GmbH
Recklinghausen, , Germany
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, , Spain
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
Barcelona, , Spain
Dept. of Neurology, Kantonsspital Aarau
Aarau, Canton of Aargau, Switzerland
Dept. of Neurology, Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois (CHUV)
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
Dept. of Neurology, Ospedale Civo of Lugano
Lugano, Canton Ticino, Switzerland
Dept. of Neurology, Bern University Hospital
Bern, , Switzerland
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève - HUG
Geneva, , Switzerland
Kantonsspital St.Gallen
Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland
Dept. of Neuroradiology, UniversitätsSpital Zürich
Zurich, , Switzerland
Belfast City Hospital
Belfast, , United Kingdom
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Salford Royal
Salford, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fladt J, Kaesmacher J, Meinel TR, Butikofer L, Strbian D, Eker OF, Albucher JF, Desal H, Marnat G, Papagiannaki C, Richard S, Requena M, Lapergue B, Pagano P, Ernst M, Wiesmann M, Boulanger M, Liebeskind DS, Gralla J, Fischer U. MRI vs CT for Baseline Imaging Evaluation in Acute Large Artery Ischemic Stroke: A Subanalysis of the SWIFT-DIRECT Trial. Neurology. 2024 Jan 23;102(2):e207922. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207922. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
Mujanovic A, Eker O, Marnat G, Strbian D, Ijas P, Preterre C, Triquenot A, Albucher JF, Gauberti M, Weisenburger-Lile D, Ernst M, Nikoubashman O, Mpotsaris A, Gory B, Tuan Hua V, Ribo M, Liebeskind DS, Dobrocky T, Meinel TR, Buetikofer L, Gralla J, Fischer U, Kaesmacher J; SWIFT DIRECT investigators. Association of intravenous thrombolysis and pre-interventional reperfusion: a post hoc analysis of the SWIFT DIRECT trial. J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Nov;15(e2):e232-e239. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019585. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
Meinel TR, Kaesmacher J, Buetikofer L, Strbian D, Eker OF, Cognard C, Mordasini P, Deppeler S, Mendes Pereira V, Albucher JF, Darcourt J, Bourcier R, Guillon B, Papagiannaki C, Costentin G, Sibolt G, Raty S, Gory B, Richard S, Liman J, Ernst M, Boulanger M, Barbier C, Mechtouff L, Zhang L, Marnat G, Sibon I, Nikoubashman O, Reich A, Consoli A, Weisenburger D, Requena M, Garcia-Tornel A, Saleme S, Moulin S, Pagano P, Saliou G, Carrera E, Janot K, Boix M, Pop R, Della Schiava L, Luft A, Piotin M, Gentric JC, Pikula A, Pfeilschifter W, Arnold M, Siddiqui A, Froehler MT, Furlan AJ, Chapot R, Wiesmann M, Machi P, Diener HC, Kulcsar Z, Bonati L, Bassetti C, Escalard S, Liebeskind D, Saver JL, Fischer U, Gralla J; SWIFT-DIRECT investigators. Time to treatment with bridging intravenous alteplase before endovascular treatment:subanalysis of the randomized controlled SWIFT-DIRECT trial. J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Sep;15(e1):e102-e110. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019207. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
Fischer U, Kaesmacher J, Strbian D, Eker O, Cognard C, Plattner PS, Butikofer L, Mordasini P, Deppeler S, Pereira VM, Albucher JF, Darcourt J, Bourcier R, Benoit G, Papagiannaki C, Ozkul-Wermester O, Sibolt G, Tiainen M, Gory B, Richard S, Liman J, Ernst MS, Boulanger M, Barbier C, Mechtouff L, Zhang L, Marnat G, Sibon I, Nikoubashman O, Reich A, Consoli A, Lapergue B, Ribo M, Tomasello A, Saleme S, Macian F, Moulin S, Pagano P, Saliou G, Carrera E, Janot K, Hernandez-Perez M, Pop R, Schiava LD, Luft AR, Piotin M, Gentric JC, Pikula A, Pfeilschifter W, Arnold M, Siddiqui AH, Froehler MT, Furlan AJ, Chapot R, Wiesmann M, Machi P, Diener HC, Kulcsar Z, Bonati LH, Bassetti CL, Mazighi M, Liebeskind DS, Saver JL, Gralla J; SWIFT DIRECT Collaborators. Thrombectomy alone versus intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy in patients with stroke: an open-label, blinded-outcome, randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2022 Jul 9;400(10346):104-115. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00537-2.
Fischer U, Kaesmacher J, S Plattner P, Butikofer L, Mordasini P, Deppeler S, Cognard C, Pereira VM, Siddiqui AH, Froehler MT, Furlan AJ, Chapot R, Strbian D, Wiesmann M, Bressan J, Lerch S, Liebeskind DS, Saver JL, Gralla J; SWIFT DIRECT study investigators. SWIFT DIRECT: Solitaire With the Intention For Thrombectomy Plus Intravenous t-PA Versus DIRECT Solitaire Stent-retriever Thrombectomy in Acute Anterior Circulation Stroke: Methodology of a randomized, controlled, multicentre study. Int J Stroke. 2022 Jul;17(6):698-705. doi: 10.1177/17474930211048768. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Trial Website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-00974
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.