Bridging Thrombolysis Versus Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

NCT ID: NCT03192332

Last Updated: 2024-11-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

410 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-11-29

Study Completion Date

2021-08-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (IV t-PA) has been the only proven therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) for almost 20 years. Whether IV t-PA prior to endovascular clot retrieval is beneficial for AIS patients with a proximal vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation has currently become a matter of debate and is a relevant unanswered question in clinical practice.

The main objective is to determine whether subjects experiencing an AIS due to large intracranial vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation will have non-inferior functional outcome at 90 days when treated with direct mechanical thrombectomy (MT) compared to subjects treated with combined IV t-PA and MT.

The secondary objectives are to study causes of mortality, dependency and quality of life in these AIS patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (IV t-PA) has been the only proven therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) for almost 20 years. Since December 2014 a new era in acute stroke treatment has begun: randomized controlled studies have consistently shown that endovascular clot retrieval in addition to best medical treatment (± IV t-PA) improves outcome in acute anterior circulation stroke patients with proximal vessel occlusion compared to best medical treatment alone. Whether pre-treatment with IV t-PA prior to endovascular clot retrieval is beneficial has now become a matter of debate. A pooled analysis of 5 RCTs (MR CLEAN, SWIFT-PRIME, EXTEND IA, ESCAPE and REVASCAT) suggested that the treatment effect size of MT does not differ between patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and those treated with MT alone (p interaction: 0.4311). Besides post-hoc RCT analyses, there are a myriad of observational studies reporting on rates of successful reperfusion and functional outcome stratified according to IV t-PA pretreatment status. There is evidence that reperfusion rates after IV t-PA in patients with occlusions of the internal carotid artery and the main stem of the middle cerebral artery are low, but may reach more than 80% after mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Therefore the most important factor for vessel recanalization, which is linked with favorable outcome, is MT.

No randomized controlled trial has ever assessed whether direct MT in patients with AIS is equally effective as MT in combination with IV t-PA (bridging thrombolysis). In a patient-level pooled analysis of five randomized controlled studies (HERMES collaboration) similar rates of functional independence and mortality at 90 days were observed between patients who received IV t-PA+MT and those who received direct MT. However, patients in the direct MT group had contraindications for IV t-PA. Two larger studies based on registries compared the outcome of patients after bridging thrombolysis with direct MT in patients eligible for IV t-PA. In both studies, the outcome of patients after bridging thrombolysis and direct MT was similar. For these reasons the investigators hypothesize that immediate and direct MT is not inferior and might even be superior to bridging thrombolysis in patients directly referred to a stroke center with rapid access to endovascular procedures.

In this trial all commercially available stent-retriever revascularization devices manufactured by Medtronic (e.g. Solitaire™) will be used as tool for direct MT. The investigators aim to provide conclusive information on the efficacy and safety of direct MT, in comparison with bridging thrombolysis.

If direct MT in patients with AIS would not be inferior to bridging thrombolysis, the organization of acute stroke management would change essentially. Direct MT would then be the therapy of choice in stroke centers with endovascular facilities. Furthermore, this trial could have an impact on healthcare guidelines and costs. However, this trial does not address the question, whether patients arriving in stroke units with no endovascular facilities should be pre-treated with IV t-PA or whether they should directly be referred to stroke centers with endovascular facilities.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ischemic Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Prospective, randomized, open label, blinded endpoint (PROBE)
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Assessment of the primary outcome will be performed by an independent and blinded person.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Direct mechanical thrombectomy

Treatment with direct mechanical thrombectomy with a commercially available stent-retriever revascularization device of the Solitaire™ type.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Stent-retriever thrombectomy with revascularization device of the Solitaire™ type

Intervention Type DEVICE

Mechanical thrombectomy with a stent-retriever revascularization device

Combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy

Treatment with intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (IV t-PA) followed by mechanical thrombectomy with a commercially available stent-retriever revascularization device of the Solitaire™ type.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Stent-retriever thrombectomy with revascularization device of the Solitaire™ type

Intervention Type DEVICE

Mechanical thrombectomy with a stent-retriever revascularization device

Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (IV t-PA)

Intervention Type DRUG

Bridging thrombolysis (IV t-PA plus mechanical thrombectomy) according to current European and North American stroke guidelines.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stent-retriever thrombectomy with revascularization device of the Solitaire™ type

Mechanical thrombectomy with a stent-retriever revascularization device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (IV t-PA)

Bridging thrombolysis (IV t-PA plus mechanical thrombectomy) according to current European and North American stroke guidelines.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Informed consent as documented by signature
2. Age ≥ 18
3. Clinical signs consistent with an acute ischemic stroke
4. Neurological deficit with a NIHSS of ≥ 5 and \< 30 (deficits judged to be clearly disabling at presentation)
5. Patient is eligible for intravenous thrombolysis
6. Patient is eligible for endovascular treatment
7. Randomization no later than 4 hours 15 minutes after stroke symptom onset and initiation of IV t-PA must be started within 4 hours 30 minutes of stroke symptoms onset (onset time is measured from the time when the subject was last seen well)
8. Occlusion (TICI 0-1) of the intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA), the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), or both confirmed by CT or MR angiography, accessible for MT
9. Core-infarct volume of Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) greater than or equal to 4 (≥ 4) based on baseline CT or MR imaging (MRI) (a region has to have diffusion abnormality in 20% or more of its volume to be considered MR-ASPECTS positive)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Acute intracranial hemorrhage
2. Any contraindication for IV t-PA
3. Pre-treatment with IV t-PA
4. In-hospital stroke
5. Pregnancy or lactating women. A negative pregnancy test before randomization is required for all women with child-bearing potential.
6. Known (serious) sensitivity to radiographic contrast agents, nickel, titanium metals, or their alloys
7. Known current participation in a clinical trial (investigational drug or medical device)
8. Renal insufficiency as defined by a serum creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dl (or 176.8 µmol/l) or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 30 mL/min or requirement for hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis
9. Severe comorbid condition with life expectancy less than 90 days at baseline
10. Known advanced dementia or significant pre-stroke disability (mRS score of ≥2)
11. Foreseeable difficulties in follow-up due to geographic reasons (e.g. patients living abroad)
12. Comorbid disease or condition that would confound the neurological and functional evaluations or compromise survival or ability to complete follow-up assessments.
13. Subject currently uses or has a recent history of illicit drug(s) or abuses alcohol (defined as regular or daily consumption of more than four alcoholic drinks per day).
14. Known history of arterial tortuosity, pre-existing stent, other arterial disease and/or known disease at the femoral access site that would prevent the device from reaching the target vessel and/or preclude safe recovery after MT
15. Radiological confirmed evidence of mass effect or intracranial tumor (except small meningioma)
16. Radiological confirmed evidence of cerebral vasculitis
17. CTA or MRA evidence of carotid artery dissection
18. Evidence of additional distal intracranial vessel occlusion in another territory (i.e. A2 segment of anterior cerebral artery or M3, M4 segment of MCA) on initial NCCT/MRI or CTA/MRA
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Urs Fischer, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dept. of Neurology, Inselspital Bern

Jan Gralla, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dept. of Neuroradiology, Inselspital Bern

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Keppler Universitätsklinikum

Linz, Upper Austria, Austria

Site Status

Medical University of Innsbruck

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

University of Calgary, Alberta Health Services

Calgary, , Canada

Site Status

Mc Gill University

Montreal, , Canada

Site Status

Royal University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan

Saskatoon, , Canada

Site Status

Toronto Western Hospital

Toronto, , Canada

Site Status

Helsinki University Hospital

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Hôpital Cavale Blanche CHU Brest

Brest, Finistère, France

Site Status

CHU de Reims

Reims, Marne, France

Site Status

CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, Puy-de-Dôme, France

Site Status

CHU de Bordeaux

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

CHU de Caen Normandie

Caen, , France

Site Status

CHU de Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

CHU de Limoges

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Hospices Civils de Lyon

Lyon, , France

Site Status

CHU de Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

CHRU Nancy

Nancy, , France

Site Status

CHU de Nantes

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Bicêtre

Paris, , France

Site Status

GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Sainte Anne

Paris, , France

Site Status

Fondation Ophtalmologique A. de Rothschild

Paris, , France

Site Status

CHU Rouen Normandie

Rouen, , France

Site Status

CHRU Strasbourg

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

CHU de Toulouse

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

CHU Tours

Tours, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Foch

Suresnes, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status

Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Universität Heidelber

Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Osnabrück GmbH

Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen

Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel

Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus GmbH Bochum

Bochum, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsmedizin Göttingen

Göttingen, , Germany

Site Status

Medizinische Fakultät der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München

München, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Vest GmbH

Recklinghausen, , Germany

Site Status

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Dept. of Neurology, Kantonsspital Aarau

Aarau, Canton of Aargau, Switzerland

Site Status

Dept. of Neurology, Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois (CHUV)

Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland

Site Status

Dept. of Neurology, Ospedale Civo of Lugano

Lugano, Canton Ticino, Switzerland

Site Status

Dept. of Neurology, Bern University Hospital

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève - HUG

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kantonsspital St.Gallen

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

Dept. of Neuroradiology, UniversitätsSpital Zürich

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Belfast City Hospital

Belfast, , United Kingdom

Site Status

St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Salford Royal

Salford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Canada Finland France Germany Spain Switzerland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fladt J, Kaesmacher J, Meinel TR, Butikofer L, Strbian D, Eker OF, Albucher JF, Desal H, Marnat G, Papagiannaki C, Richard S, Requena M, Lapergue B, Pagano P, Ernst M, Wiesmann M, Boulanger M, Liebeskind DS, Gralla J, Fischer U. MRI vs CT for Baseline Imaging Evaluation in Acute Large Artery Ischemic Stroke: A Subanalysis of the SWIFT-DIRECT Trial. Neurology. 2024 Jan 23;102(2):e207922. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207922. Epub 2023 Dec 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38165324 (View on PubMed)

Mujanovic A, Eker O, Marnat G, Strbian D, Ijas P, Preterre C, Triquenot A, Albucher JF, Gauberti M, Weisenburger-Lile D, Ernst M, Nikoubashman O, Mpotsaris A, Gory B, Tuan Hua V, Ribo M, Liebeskind DS, Dobrocky T, Meinel TR, Buetikofer L, Gralla J, Fischer U, Kaesmacher J; SWIFT DIRECT investigators. Association of intravenous thrombolysis and pre-interventional reperfusion: a post hoc analysis of the SWIFT DIRECT trial. J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Nov;15(e2):e232-e239. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019585. Epub 2022 Nov 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36396433 (View on PubMed)

Meinel TR, Kaesmacher J, Buetikofer L, Strbian D, Eker OF, Cognard C, Mordasini P, Deppeler S, Mendes Pereira V, Albucher JF, Darcourt J, Bourcier R, Guillon B, Papagiannaki C, Costentin G, Sibolt G, Raty S, Gory B, Richard S, Liman J, Ernst M, Boulanger M, Barbier C, Mechtouff L, Zhang L, Marnat G, Sibon I, Nikoubashman O, Reich A, Consoli A, Weisenburger D, Requena M, Garcia-Tornel A, Saleme S, Moulin S, Pagano P, Saliou G, Carrera E, Janot K, Boix M, Pop R, Della Schiava L, Luft A, Piotin M, Gentric JC, Pikula A, Pfeilschifter W, Arnold M, Siddiqui A, Froehler MT, Furlan AJ, Chapot R, Wiesmann M, Machi P, Diener HC, Kulcsar Z, Bonati L, Bassetti C, Escalard S, Liebeskind D, Saver JL, Fischer U, Gralla J; SWIFT-DIRECT investigators. Time to treatment with bridging intravenous alteplase before endovascular treatment:subanalysis of the randomized controlled SWIFT-DIRECT trial. J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Sep;15(e1):e102-e110. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019207. Epub 2022 Jul 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35902234 (View on PubMed)

Fischer U, Kaesmacher J, Strbian D, Eker O, Cognard C, Plattner PS, Butikofer L, Mordasini P, Deppeler S, Pereira VM, Albucher JF, Darcourt J, Bourcier R, Benoit G, Papagiannaki C, Ozkul-Wermester O, Sibolt G, Tiainen M, Gory B, Richard S, Liman J, Ernst MS, Boulanger M, Barbier C, Mechtouff L, Zhang L, Marnat G, Sibon I, Nikoubashman O, Reich A, Consoli A, Lapergue B, Ribo M, Tomasello A, Saleme S, Macian F, Moulin S, Pagano P, Saliou G, Carrera E, Janot K, Hernandez-Perez M, Pop R, Schiava LD, Luft AR, Piotin M, Gentric JC, Pikula A, Pfeilschifter W, Arnold M, Siddiqui AH, Froehler MT, Furlan AJ, Chapot R, Wiesmann M, Machi P, Diener HC, Kulcsar Z, Bonati LH, Bassetti CL, Mazighi M, Liebeskind DS, Saver JL, Gralla J; SWIFT DIRECT Collaborators. Thrombectomy alone versus intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy in patients with stroke: an open-label, blinded-outcome, randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2022 Jul 9;400(10346):104-115. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00537-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35810756 (View on PubMed)

Fischer U, Kaesmacher J, S Plattner P, Butikofer L, Mordasini P, Deppeler S, Cognard C, Pereira VM, Siddiqui AH, Froehler MT, Furlan AJ, Chapot R, Strbian D, Wiesmann M, Bressan J, Lerch S, Liebeskind DS, Saver JL, Gralla J; SWIFT DIRECT study investigators. SWIFT DIRECT: Solitaire With the Intention For Thrombectomy Plus Intravenous t-PA Versus DIRECT Solitaire Stent-retriever Thrombectomy in Acute Anterior Circulation Stroke: Methodology of a randomized, controlled, multicentre study. Int J Stroke. 2022 Jul;17(6):698-705. doi: 10.1177/17474930211048768. Epub 2021 Oct 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34569878 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2017-00974

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.