Cricopharyngeal Dysfunction and Esophageal Diverticulum
NCT ID: NCT03187925
Last Updated: 2023-09-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
500 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-08-15
2027-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Endoscopic "Rendez-vous" Technique Foresophageal Reconstructions for the Treatment of a Total and Extensive Disruption of the Esophagus
NCT02166957
Minimal-Massive Intervention in Elderly Patients With Dysphagia
NCT02396992
Assessing Outcomes After Surgery for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disorder
NCT00518505
Prospective Randomized Trial Evaluating the Utility of Esophageal Stitches During Laparoscopic Fundoplication
NCT01509352
Esophageal Calibration During Laparoscopic Fundoplication Reduces Dysphagia
NCT01501071
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
open, transcervical versus rigid endoscopic treatment
The goal of the project is to perform the first prospective, multi-institutional long-term (5 year) study comparing the outcomes of open, transcervical versus rigid endoscopic treatment of cervical esophageal diverticulum and cricopharyngeal dysfunction in resolving associated symptoms, complications, and recurrence rates of dysphagia surgery. This study will also include cricopharyngeal bar as it pertains to an early Zenker's diverticulum.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Cincinnati
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rebecca Howell
assistant professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rebecca J Howell, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Cincinnati
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UC Health Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice. 2002 Jun;16(2):274-7. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(02)00097-8.
Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J, Leonard RJ. Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008 Dec;117(12):919-24. doi: 10.1177/000348940811701210.
Bock JM, Van Daele DJ, Gupta N, Blumin JH. Management of Zenker's diverticulum in the endoscopic age: current practice patterns. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011 Dec;120(12):796-806. doi: 10.1177/000348941112001205.
Leong SC, Wilkie MD, Webb CJ. Endoscopic stapling of Zenker's diverticulum: establishing national baselines for auditing clinical outcomes in the United Kingdom. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Aug;269(8):1877-84. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-1945-3. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
Parker NP, Misono S. Carbon dioxide laser versus stapler-assisted endoscopic Zenker's diverticulotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 May;150(5):750-3. doi: 10.1177/0194599814521554. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
Verdonck J, Morton RP. Systematic review on treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Nov;272(11):3095-107. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3267-0. Epub 2014 Sep 7.
Wilken R, Whited C, Scher RL. Endoscopic staple diverticulostomy for Zenker's diverticulum: review of experience in 337 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015 Jan;124(1):21-9. doi: 10.1177/0003489414542421. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
Venkatesan NN, Evangelista LM, Kuhn MA, Belafsky PC. Normal fluoroscopic appearance status post-successful endoscopic Zenker diverticulotomy. Laryngoscope. 2017 Aug;127(8):1762-1766. doi: 10.1002/lary.26446. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016-6955
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.