The Hemodynamic Effect Between Two Types of Anesthesia in Esophageal Surgery

NCT ID: NCT03185403

Last Updated: 2017-06-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

54 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-12-31

Study Completion Date

2017-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Continuous Paravertebral block (PVB) was reported to provide less episodes of hypotension than continuous thoracic epidural block (TEB). The maintenance of optimal tissue perfusion is essential for esophageal anastomosis in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. the aim of this study is to compare Hemodynamic effect of continous PVB compared to TEB , in patient undergoing oesophagectomy with laparoscopy and thoracotomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Epidural Block Oesophageal Cancer Oesophagectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

continous paravertebral block

echoguided thoracic continous paravertebral block was placed before the surgery.

A bolus of 5 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% and 10µg of Sufentanil was injected in the catheter at the end of the abdominal time. A continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at 4ml/h was then initiated at the thoracic time. Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia consisted on an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at 6ml/h and a permitted bolus of 4ml every 15min as required.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

paravertebral block

Intervention Type OTHER

in the paravertebral block , the catheter was placed under ultrasound echography , at the right thoracic T4/T5 level

ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Sufentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

continous Thoracic epidural block

thoracic epidural catheter was inserted before the surgery. A bolus of 5 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% and 10µg of Sufentanil was injected in the catheter at the end of the abdominal time. A continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at 4ml/h was then initiated at the thoracic time. Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia consisted on an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at 6ml/h and a permitted bolus of 4ml every 15min as required.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

thoracic epidural block

Intervention Type OTHER

in the epidural block the catheter was inserted without echography , at T4/T5 level

ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Sufentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

paravertebral block

in the paravertebral block , the catheter was placed under ultrasound echography , at the right thoracic T4/T5 level

Intervention Type OTHER

thoracic epidural block

in the epidural block the catheter was inserted without echography , at T4/T5 level

Intervention Type OTHER

ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Sufentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA score 1 to 3
* oesophagectomy : abdominal time with laparoscopy ans thoracic time with thoracotomy

Exclusion Criteria

* pregnancy
* Uncooperative patient
* patient refusal
* Coagulopathy
* allergy to local anesthetic
* Psychological Disorders
* Failure to install the epidural or paravertebral catheter. The patient will therefore be excluded secondarily but will be able to benefit from an alternative technique for the management of his pain.
* Sepsis
* Skin infection at the puncture site
* Allergy to local anesthetics
* Esophagectomy with cervical surgical time
* Patient with chronic pain EVA\> 4 before surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Lille

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gilles Lebuffe, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Lille

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHRU , Hôpital Claude Huriez

Lille, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Davies RG, Myles PS, Graham JM. A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Apr;96(4):418-26. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael020. Epub 2006 Feb 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16476698 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-002317-36

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2012_47

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Paravertebral Catheters for VATS Procedures
NCT02361775 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1