The Hemodynamic Effect Between Two Types of Anesthesia in Esophageal Surgery
NCT ID: NCT03185403
Last Updated: 2017-06-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-12-31
2017-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Postoperative Analgesia Between Paravertebral Block and Epidural Block in Esophageal Surgery
NCT06704698
Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery.
NCT01082744
The Ultrasound-guided Multiple-injection Costotransverse Block for Mastectomy and Primary Reconstructive Surgery.
NCT04248179
Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block Using Ropivacaine With/Without Dexamethasone in Elective Thoracotomy
NCT02871193
Paravertebral Analgesia Associated With Intravenous Morphine PCA After Thoracotomy
NCT00620490
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
continous paravertebral block
echoguided thoracic continous paravertebral block was placed before the surgery.
A bolus of 5 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% and 10µg of Sufentanil was injected in the catheter at the end of the abdominal time. A continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at 4ml/h was then initiated at the thoracic time. Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia consisted on an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at 6ml/h and a permitted bolus of 4ml every 15min as required.
paravertebral block
in the paravertebral block , the catheter was placed under ultrasound echography , at the right thoracic T4/T5 level
ropivacaine
Sufentanil
continous Thoracic epidural block
thoracic epidural catheter was inserted before the surgery. A bolus of 5 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% and 10µg of Sufentanil was injected in the catheter at the end of the abdominal time. A continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at 4ml/h was then initiated at the thoracic time. Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia consisted on an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at 6ml/h and a permitted bolus of 4ml every 15min as required.
thoracic epidural block
in the epidural block the catheter was inserted without echography , at T4/T5 level
ropivacaine
Sufentanil
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
paravertebral block
in the paravertebral block , the catheter was placed under ultrasound echography , at the right thoracic T4/T5 level
thoracic epidural block
in the epidural block the catheter was inserted without echography , at T4/T5 level
ropivacaine
Sufentanil
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* oesophagectomy : abdominal time with laparoscopy ans thoracic time with thoracotomy
Exclusion Criteria
* Uncooperative patient
* patient refusal
* Coagulopathy
* allergy to local anesthetic
* Psychological Disorders
* Failure to install the epidural or paravertebral catheter. The patient will therefore be excluded secondarily but will be able to benefit from an alternative technique for the management of his pain.
* Sepsis
* Skin infection at the puncture site
* Allergy to local anesthetics
* Esophagectomy with cervical surgical time
* Patient with chronic pain EVA\> 4 before surgery.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Lille
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gilles Lebuffe, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Lille
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHRU , Hôpital Claude Huriez
Lille, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Davies RG, Myles PS, Graham JM. A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Apr;96(4):418-26. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael020. Epub 2006 Feb 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2013-002317-36
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2012_47
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.