Efficacy of FLU-v in an H1N1 Influenza Human Challenge Model

NCT ID: NCT03180801

Last Updated: 2020-08-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

153 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-08-18

Study Completion Date

2017-05-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

FLU-v is a broad spectrum influenza vaccine that targets regions conserved among multiple influenza strains. FLU-v adjuvanted with Montanide ISA-51 was shown to be safe in previous trials. This study aims to assess efficacy of adjuvanted FLU-v vaccine in protecting healthy volunteers against an influenza challenge delivered intranasally under quarantine.

Efficacy of FLU-v will be assessed by measuring the incidence and severity of the disease in the treatment groups compared to the placebo group. In addition, the immune responses of the volunteers to FLU-v will also be explored.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Influenza is a highly variable virus. Most of the variability comes from the proteins on the viral capsid surface; NA and HA. Current vaccines use these highly variable, immunogenic proteins to induce production of neutralising antibodies, however because these proteins are different for each strain, and can also change over time within strains due to antigenic drift, a new vaccine is required each year designed specifically to the strain predicted to circulate that year. In the event of a mismatch between predicted and actual circulating strains, or the emergence of a new strain due to antigenic shift, the effectiveness of the annual vaccine is drastically reduced. These limitations are further compounded by the short manufacturing window between strain prediction and the start of the influenza season, as well as the limited supply of suitable eggs used for vaccine production. As a result of these issues, only a limited supply of annual vaccine is available.

FLU-v, a novel peptide vaccine, aims to provide a broad-spectrum response using peptide antigens matching immunogenic regions of conserved viral proteins found inside the viral capsid. These antigens have been shown to induce cytotoxic T-cell responses and non-neutralising antibodies in both pre-clinical and clinical studies. The FLU-v vaccine administered with and without adjuvant has been demonstrated to be safe in previous trials, and addition of adjuvant Montanide ISA-51 was shown to produce superior immunological responses compared to non-adjuvanted FLU-v. Data from a previous phase IIb study conducted as part of the UNISEC consortium suggest that the cellular and/or humoral responses resulting from vaccination with adjuvanted FLU-v may reduce influenza symptom severity and duration, although the study was not powered to assess these efficacy measures.

Presently, efficacy will be evaluated as a primary endpoint alongside safety as part of a single centre, placebo controlled, phase IIb viral challenge study, using influenza A 2009 H1N1 human virus, in suitable healthy subjects aged 18-60 years. Two dosing regimens will be explored. In addition, immunological endpoints will be addressed as exploratory endpoints.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Influenza

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1 adjuvanted placebo

0.5ml adjuvanted placebo on Day -43 and on Day -22 followed by influenza challenge on day 0

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

adjuvanted placebo

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 0.5ml emulsion made of 0.25ml of WFI and 0.25ml of adjuvant Montanide ISA-51

Influenza challenge

Intervention Type OTHER

On day 0, administration with an intranasal sprayer of 1ml of PBS containing 10(7) TCID50 of Influenza A 2009 H1N1 human virus manufactured under GMP in certified Vero cells.

Group 2 adjuvanted FLU-v one dose

0.5ml (500mcg) adjuvanted FLU-v vaccine on Day -43 and adjuvanted placebo on Day -22 followed by influenza challenge on day 0

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

adjuvanted FLU-v

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 500mcg of FLU-v as 0.5ml emulsion in 0.25ml of WFI and 0.25ml of adjuvant Montanide ISA-51

adjuvanted placebo

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 0.5ml emulsion made of 0.25ml of WFI and 0.25ml of adjuvant Montanide ISA-51

Influenza challenge

Intervention Type OTHER

On day 0, administration with an intranasal sprayer of 1ml of PBS containing 10(7) TCID50 of Influenza A 2009 H1N1 human virus manufactured under GMP in certified Vero cells.

Group 3 adjuvanted FLU-v two doses

0.5ml (500mcg) adjuvanted FLU-v vaccine on Day -43 and on Day -22 followed by influenza challenge on day 0

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

adjuvanted FLU-v

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 500mcg of FLU-v as 0.5ml emulsion in 0.25ml of WFI and 0.25ml of adjuvant Montanide ISA-51

Influenza challenge

Intervention Type OTHER

On day 0, administration with an intranasal sprayer of 1ml of PBS containing 10(7) TCID50 of Influenza A 2009 H1N1 human virus manufactured under GMP in certified Vero cells.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

adjuvanted FLU-v

Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 500mcg of FLU-v as 0.5ml emulsion in 0.25ml of WFI and 0.25ml of adjuvant Montanide ISA-51

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

adjuvanted placebo

Subcutaneous injection in the upper arm with 0.5ml emulsion made of 0.25ml of WFI and 0.25ml of adjuvant Montanide ISA-51

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Influenza challenge

On day 0, administration with an intranasal sprayer of 1ml of PBS containing 10(7) TCID50 of Influenza A 2009 H1N1 human virus manufactured under GMP in certified Vero cells.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Healthy males and females aged ≥18 and ≤55 years of age at the point of enrolment.
2. Willingness to remain in isolation for the duration of viral shedding and to comply with all study requirements.
3. The following criteria are applicable to subjects in a heterosexual relationship and female subjects in a same sex relationship (i.e., the criteria do not apply to male subjects in a same sex relationship):

1. True abstinence- when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. (Periodic abstinence \[e.g. calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods\] and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception).

Or
2. Two forms of effective contraceptive methods among (between) the couple, which are defined as:

* For males: condom with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream, sterilisation (with the appropriate post-vasectomy documentation of the absence of sperm in the ejaculate. This applies only to males participating in the study).
* For females:

Women no longer of child bearing potential (post-menopausal females are defined as having a history of amenorrhea for at least 2 years, otherwise they should have documented status as being surgically sterile or post hysterectomy. The latter applies only to females participating in the study). If of childbearing potential, then acceptable forms of contraception include:
* Established (a minimum of 2 weeks prior to admission) use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception.
* Placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS).
* Barrier methods of contraception or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps), both with one of the following - spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/suppository.

* The longevity of contraception is as follows:

Males:
* Comply with agreed contraception at entry to quarantine, and continuing until 90 days after the date of viral challenge/last dosing with IMP (whichever occurs last).
* Must not donate sperm following discharge from quarantine until 90 days after the date of viral challenge/last dosing with IMP (whichever occurs last).

Females:

If of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and just prior to the date of Viral Challenge, and must be using contraception consisting of two forms of birth control (one of which must be a barrier method) starting from at least 2 weeks prior to the first vaccination and continuing until 90 days after the date of Viral Challenge/last dosing with IMP (whichever occurs last).
4. Willing to have samples stored for future research.
5. Sero-suitable to the study challenge virus within 90 days of Day 0.
6. Agrees to abstain from alcohol intake 24 hours before admission on Day -2 or Day -1 and all other outpatient visits.
7. Agrees to not use prescription or over-the-counter medications (including aspirin, decongestants, antihistamines, and other NSAIDs), and herbal medication (including, but not limited to, Vitamin C, Vitamin D, immune booster products, herbal tea, St. John's Wort), within 14 days prior to study vaccine administration through the final follow-up visit, unless approved by the investigator and sponsor medical monitor.
8. An informed consent document signed and dated by the subject and the Investigator or delegate.
9. A history of childhood asthma before the age of 12 years is acceptable provided the subject is asymptomatic without treatment. Subjects with a single episode of wheezing (lasting less than 2 weeks) after the age of 12 years can be included at the Investigator's discretion provided the episode was more than 1 year ago and did not require a hospital admission and/or oral/intravenous steroids.
10. In good health with no history of major medical conditions that will interfere with subject safety, as defined by medical history, physical examination, and routine laboratory tests and determined by the Investigator at a screening evaluation.

* A subject with a history of Herpes type 1 or 2 infection may be included if there are no active lesions present and the subject is not taking active medication.
* Chronic cardiovascular disease (e.g., cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, cardiac surgery, ischemic heart disease, known anatomic defects).
* Chronic medical conditions requiring close medical follow-up or hospitalisation during the past 5 years (e.g., insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, haemoglobinopathies).
* Immunosuppression, or immunodeficiency or ongoing malignancy.
* Neurological and neurodevelopmental conditions (e.g., cerebral palsy, epilepsy, stroke, seizures).
* Post infectious or post vaccine neurological sequelae.
* Hyperlipidemia requiring medical therapy per current American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines published in 2013.
3. Individual with body mass index (BMI) \<18 and \>35.
4. Acute illness within 7 days of first vaccine administration day
5. Clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) and/or parameters, as determined by the Investigator
6. Subjects with clinically significant abnormal systolic and diastolic blood pressure or clinically significant abnormal pulse rate.
7. Subject has abnormal pulmonary function as measured by spirometry defined as a forced vital capacity or forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) \< 80% of predicted or peripheral arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) \< 92% on room air.
8. Known allergy to treatments for influenza (including but not limited to oseltamivir, nonsteroidals).
9. Known allergy to 2 or more classes of antibiotics (e.g. penicillins, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, or glycopeptides). Known allergy to excipients in the challenge virus inoculum
10. Daily or household contact with vulnerable populations.
11. Receipt of any investigational drug:

* within 3 months prior to the planned date of Viral Challenge/first dosing with IMP (whichever occurs first).
* Receipt of three or more investigational drugs within the previous 12 months prior to the planned date of Viral Challenge/first dosing with IMP (whichever occurs first).
* Prior inoculation with a virus from the same virus-family as the Challenge Virus.
* Prior participation in another Human Viral Challenge study with a respiratory virus in the preceding 12 months taken from the date of Viral Challenge/first dosing with IMP (whichever occurs first) in the previous study to the date of expected Viral Challenge in this study.
12. Receipt of any vaccine within 6 months of enrolment.
13. Self-reported or known history of alcoholism or drug abuse (including marijuana) within 6 months prior to enrolment, or positive urine/serum test for drugs of abuse during the study
14. Self-reported or known history of psychiatric or psychological issues that require treatment and are deemed by the PI to be a contraindication to protocol participation.
15. History of a previous severe allergic reaction with generalized urticaria, angioedema, or anaphylaxis.
16. History or evidence of autoimmune disease or known immunodeficiency of any cause - with the exception of atopic dermatitis/eczema and atopic rhinitis.
18. Positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) within 60 days of first vaccination visit, active hepatitis A (HAV), B (HBV), or C (HCV) test.
19. Any significant abnormality altering the anatomy of the nose or nasopharynx (including significant nasal polyps).
20. Venous access deemed inadequate for the phlebotomy and cannulation demands of the study.
21. Any nasal or sinus surgery within 6 months of Viral Challenge.
22. Recurrent history of fainting.
23. Those employed or immediate relatives of those employed at hVIVO or the Sponsor.
24. Any clinically significant history of epistaxis (nosebleeds) within the last 12 months and/or history of being hospitalized due to epistaxis on any previous occasion.
25. Females who:

* Are breastfeeding,
* or have been pregnant within 6 months prior to the study,
* or have a positive pregnancy test at any point during screening or prior to first dosing with IMP.
26. Presence of fever, defined as subject presenting with a temperature reading of \> 38.0°C on Day -43
27. Receipt of blood or blood products, or loss (including blood donations) of 470 mL or more of blood during the 3 months prior to the planned date of first dosing with IMP or planned during the 3 months after the final visit.
28. Receipt of systemic (intravenous and/or oral) glucocorticoids or systemic antiviral drugs within 6 months prior to the planned date of first dosing with IMP.
29. Any other finding that, in the opinion of the Investigator, deems the subject unsuitable for the study

Exclusion Criteria

11. A documented medical history for a minimum of the last 2 years prior to inoculation.


1. Any subjects who have smoked 10 pack years at any time. Of those subjects that have smoked less than 10 pack years at any time, a subject will be excluded: If regular smokers (e.g., smoking every day) at the time of enrolment. If current casual smoker or use of smoking / nicotine-related products, they must agree to refrain from smoking during the in-patient stay
2. Presence of self-reported or medically documented significant medical condition including but not limited to:
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

PepTcell Limited

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeremy Dennison, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hammersmith Medicines Research

Balpreet Matharu, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

hVIVO Services Limited

Matthew J Memoli, M.D

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

hVIVO Services Limited

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stoloff GA, Caparros-Wanderley W. Synthetic multi-epitope peptides identified in silico induce protective immunity against multiple influenza serotypes. Eur J Immunol. 2007 Sep;37(9):2441-9. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737254.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17668898 (View on PubMed)

Pleguezuelos O, Robinson S, Stoloff GA, Caparros-Wanderley W. Synthetic Influenza vaccine (FLU-v) stimulates cell mediated immunity in a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled Phase I trial. Vaccine. 2012 Jun 29;30(31):4655-60. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.089. Epub 2012 May 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22575166 (View on PubMed)

Pleguezuelos O, Robinson S, Fernandez A, Stoloff GA, Mann A, Gilbert A, Balaratnam G, Wilkinson T, Lambkin-Williams R, Oxford J, Caparros-Wanderley W. A Synthetic Influenza Virus Vaccine Induces a Cellular Immune Response That Correlates with Reduction in Symptomatology and Virus Shedding in a Randomized Phase Ib Live-Virus Challenge in Humans. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015 Jul;22(7):828-35. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00098-15. Epub 2015 May 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25994549 (View on PubMed)

Pleguezuelos O, Robinson S, Fernandez A, Stoloff GA, Caparros-Wanderley W. Meta-Analysis and Potential Role of Preexisting Heterosubtypic Cellular Immunity Based on Variations in Disease Severity Outcomes for Influenza Live Viral Challenges in Humans. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015 Aug;22(8):949-56. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00101-15. Epub 2015 Jun 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26084515 (View on PubMed)

van Doorn E, Pleguezuelos O, Liu H, Fernandez A, Bannister R, Stoloff G, Oftung F, Norley S, Huckriede A, Frijlink HW, Hak E. Evaluation of the immunogenicity and safety of different doses and formulations of a broad spectrum influenza vaccine (FLU-v) developed by SEEK: study protocol for a single-center, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical phase IIb trial. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 4;17(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2341-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28376743 (View on PubMed)

Memoli MJ, Czajkowski L, Reed S, Athota R, Bristol T, Proudfoot K, Fargis S, Stein M, Dunfee RL, Shaw PA, Davey RT, Taubenberger JK. Validation of the wild-type influenza A human challenge model H1N1pdMIST: an A(H1N1)pdm09 dose-finding investigational new drug study. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Mar 1;60(5):693-702. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu924. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25416753 (View on PubMed)

Ponne S, Kumar R, Vanmathi SM, Brilhante RSN, Kumar CR. Reverse engineering protection: A comprehensive survey of reverse vaccinology-based vaccines targeting viral pathogens. Vaccine. 2024 Apr 11;42(10):2503-2518. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.087. Epub 2024 Mar 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38523003 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-002134-74

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2015-25472

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

FLU-v-004

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

FLUAD® vs. Fluzone® High-Dose Study
NCT03183908 COMPLETED PHASE4