Immunogenicity, Safety, Reactogenicity, Efficacy, Effectiveness and Lot Consistency of FluBlok
NCT ID: NCT00539981
Last Updated: 2022-04-06
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
4648 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-09-15
2008-05-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety and Reactogenicity of FluBlok and Comparison of Immunogenicity, Efficacy and Effectiveness Against TIV
NCT00539864
Comparison of the Immunogenicity, Safety and Reactogenicity of FluBlok, To a Licensed Vaccine In Elderly Adults
NCT00395174
Immunogenicity and Safety of FluBlok Trivalent Recombinant Hemagglutinin Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Pediatrics
NCT00336453
Immunogenicity and Safety of a Vaccine Against Influenza (2010-2011 Northern Hemisphere Season, Intramuscular Route)
NCT01121822
Immunogenicity and Safety Study of GSK Biologicals' Fluviral® (2008 - 2009 Season) in Adults Over 18 Years
NCT00718120
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One potential alternative method for production of influenza vaccine was expression of the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) using recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) techniques. This alternative avoided dependence on eggs and was very efficient because of the high levels of protein expression under the control of the baculovirus polyhedrin promoter.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
FluBlok (Lots A, B, C)
Participants received a single 0.5 milliliters (mL) dose of FluBlok vaccine from any of the Lots A, B, or C, intramuscularly on Day 0 (Visit 1). Participants were followed up to 6 months after vaccination.
FluBlok®
Dose: 0.5 mL, single dose; Route of administration: intramuscular. Recombinant Trivalent Hemagglutinin Influenza Vaccine containing 45 microgram (mcg) of each hemagglutinin derived from A/Solomon Islands/3/2006 (H1N1), A/Wisconsin/67/2005 (H3N2), and B/Malaysia/2506/2004
Placebo
Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to FluBlok, intramuscularly on Day 0 (Visit 1). Participants were followed up to 6 months after vaccination.
Placebo
Dose: 0.5 mL normal saline for injection, single dose; Route of administration: intramuscular
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
FluBlok®
Dose: 0.5 mL, single dose; Route of administration: intramuscular. Recombinant Trivalent Hemagglutinin Influenza Vaccine containing 45 microgram (mcg) of each hemagglutinin derived from A/Solomon Islands/3/2006 (H1N1), A/Wisconsin/67/2005 (H3N2), and B/Malaysia/2506/2004
Placebo
Dose: 0.5 mL normal saline for injection, single dose; Route of administration: intramuscular
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Provided informed consent prior to any study procedures.
* Able to comply with all study procedures.
* Available for follow-up for the duration of the influenza season.
* Women of child-bearing potential must have had a negative urine pregnancy test at the time of randomization and must be willing to use an adequate form of contraception (includes abstinence, condom with spermicide, licensed hormonal contraceptive, intrauterine device \[IUD\], monogamous relationship with a vasectomized partner) during the course of the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of high-risk conditions or other characteristics were considered to be indication for influenza vaccination, as defined by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.
* Acute febrile illness (defined as having a temperature greater than or equal to \[\>=\]100 degrees Fahrenheit) or upper respiratory tract illness within 72 hours of vaccination. Participants with acute febrile illness were rescheduled after fever resolved.
* Use of experimental vaccines or any influenza vaccine other than FluBlOk after May 31st 2007 for the 2008 Southern Hemisphere or 2007 to 2008 Northern hemisphere epidemic seasons.
* Immunosuppression as a result of an underlying illness or treatment, or used anticancer chemotherapy or radiation therapy within the preceding 36 months.
* Any malignancy diagnosed or treated actively during the past five (5) years, with two (2) exceptions. Participant with any history of lymphoproliferative disorder were excluded. However, participants with a history of localized non-melanotic skin cancer were eligible.
* Receipt of any other licensed vaccines within 2 weeks (for inactivated vaccines) or 4 weeks (for live vaccines) prior to enrollment in this study.
* Receipt of an experimental agent (vaccine, drug, biologic, device, blood product or medication) within 1 month prior to enrollment in this study, or expected to receive an experimental agent during study period.
* Receipt of parenteral immunoglobulin or other blood product within the three months prior to study vaccination.
* Major psychiatric diagnosis including schizophrenia, bipolar disease or other major depression, or any diagnosis of dementia or associated concomitant medications (e.g., Aricept) used for treating dementia.
* Known active human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C infection.
* History of alcohol or drug abuse in the last 5 years.
* Not available for three or more consecutive weeks during flu surveillance period.
* Any acute or chronic condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would render vaccination unsafe or interfere with the evaluation of responses or render the participant unable to meet the requirements of the protocol.
18 Years
49 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Protein Sciences Corporation
INDUSTRY
Sanofi
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John J Treanor, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Rochester
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Impact Clinical Trials
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Benchmark Research - Sacramento
Sacramento, California, United States
Benchmark Research - San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
University Clinical Research, Inc
Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
Vince and Associates
Overland Park, Kansas, United States
Kentucky pediatric /Adult Research
Bardstown, Kentucky, United States
Benchmarch Research - New Orleans
Metairie, Louisiana, United States
University of Maryland - Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Saint Louis University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Meridian Clinical Research
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Regional Clinical Research, Inc.
Endwell, New York, United States
Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, United States
Carolina Medical Trials
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Sterling Research
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Primary Physicians Research - Pediatric Alliance St. Clair
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Primary Physicians Research
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Benchmarch Research - Austin
Austin, Texas, United States
Benchmark Research - Fort Worth
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, United States
Benchmark Research - San Angelo
San Angelo, Texas, United States
Jean Brown Research
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
University of Virginia Health System
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Marshfield Clinic
Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Treanor JJ, El Sahly H, King J, Graham I, Izikson R, Kohberger R, Patriarca P, Cox M. Protective efficacy of a trivalent recombinant hemagglutinin protein vaccine (FluBlok(R)) against influenza in healthy adults: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Vaccine. 2011 Oct 13;29(44):7733-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.128. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
Rajendran M, Nachbagauer R, Ermler ME, Bunduc P, Amanat F, Izikson R, Cox M, Palese P, Eichelberger M, Krammer F. Analysis of Anti-Influenza Virus Neuraminidase Antibodies in Children, Adults, and the Elderly by ELISA and Enzyme Inhibition: Evidence for Original Antigenic Sin. mBio. 2017 Mar 21;8(2):e02281-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02281-16.
Nachbagauer R, Choi A, Izikson R, Cox MM, Palese P, Krammer F. Age Dependence and Isotype Specificity of Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin Stalk-Reactive Antibodies in Humans. mBio. 2016 Jan 19;7(1):e01996-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01996-15.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Related Info
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PSC04
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.