Transdiagnostic Brain-Behavior Profiling to Enhance Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Response

NCT ID: NCT03175068

Last Updated: 2022-03-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

203 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-07-05

Study Completion Date

2022-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Many patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and generalized Social Anxiety Disorder (gSAD) are treated with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) but few have meaningful improvement. MDD and gSAD are diseases of brain dysfunction that manifest as impaired emotion regulation; CBT teaches emotion regulation strategies but how it works in the brain remains largely unknown. Individual differences in brain function related to emotion regulation may make some patients better suited for CBT and CBT may remedy the brain dysfunction that underlies these disorders. This project will compare CBT with a placebo psychotherapy (i.e., supportive therapy) in MDD and gSAD to test, validate, and refine brain-based markers and examine mechanisms of change to examine how CBT works and for whom.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and generalized Social Anxiety Disorder (gSAD) are pervasive major public health problems. These disorders are characterized by emotion dysregulation, an inability or inefficiency to regulate negative and positive affect as reflected in common and disorder-specific symptoms (e.g., attentional bias to negative stimuli, excessive/inappropriate negative thoughts, hyperarousal, anhedonia, emotional blunting). Such dysregulation is believed to result from an imbalance between top-down 'emotion regulating' (ER) frontal nodes central in inhibitory control of bottom-up subcortical 'emotion-generating' (EG) nodes in a Fronto-Limbic Affect Regulation and Emotional Salience (FLARES) network. Therefore, successful treatment would be expected to 'normalize' neurofunctional disturbances in the FLARES network, which can be measured with fMRI and more distal units of brain function -- event-related potentials (ERPs) from electroencephalography, startle potentiation from electromyography (EMG), neurocognitive performance, and use of regulation strategies in daily life via self-report. The overarching objective of the proposed study is to understand how, when, and where CBT works and for whom to tailor treatment to improve clinical outcome.

Without precisely identified "targets" and "predictors" of change, CBT response will continue to be unpredictably varied with few achieving meaningful clinical improvement placing them at risk for relapse and recurrence. Our proposal builds on published data from our lab and others and Preliminary Data which shows FLARES function, as assayed with fMRI, ERPs, EMG, and behaviors, is sensitive to change following CBT.

Importantly, both baseline fMRI and non-fMRI units of brain-behavioral measures predict CBT response better than baseline clinical measures. Such knowledge can lead to more precise interventions aimed at capitalizing on 'strengths' or improving 'deficits' that may each exist before CBT and/or explain why CBT does not work for some patients. The dual development of fMRI ('mechanistic') and non-fMRI ('pragmatic') predictors and indices of therapeutic change is aimed at advancing precision medicine while increasing the clinical utility of 'biomarkers' in the outpatient setting. With this objective, we propose to employ well-validated paradigms to test ER and EG in the context of negative stimuli, reward processes, and fear systems in MDD and gSAD to delineate common and disorder-specific mechanisms of change and predictors of CBT outcome. We will enroll 200 patients: 100 MDD (without comorbid gSAD), 100 gSAD (without comorbid MDD) and randomize them to 12 weeks of manualized CBT or 12 weeks of 'placebo' psychotherapy (supportive therapy) (1:1 ratio). Multiple units of FLARES function will be collected in all patients before (Week 0), during (midway/Week 6) and after treatment (Week 12) to ascertain CBT 'dose' effects, and in 40 healthy controls for comparison. Pre-CBT predictors based on binary (responder/non-responder status) and continuous (extent of change) outcomes will be examined midway (Week 6), immediately after treatment (Week 12), and at 6-month follow-up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Major Depressive Disorder Social Anxiety Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CBT

The clinical psychologist will use a manualized CBT approach tailored to MDD or gSAD. Over a 12-week period sessions will include core CBT strategies -- psychoeducation, cognitive intervention (e.g., cognitive restructuring), behavioral changes (i.e., fear exposure, behavioral activation strategies) and relapse prevention.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CBT

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

CBT works by changing people's attitudes and their behavior by focusing on the thoughts, images, beliefs and attitudes that are held (a person's cognitive processes) and how these processes relate to the way a person behaves, as a way of dealing with emotional problems.

ST

The clinical psychologist will use an ST approach that resembles client-centered therapy of Carl Rogers (1951) which has been used as a control psychotherapy. The manual is based on supportive psychotherapy principles. Over a 12-week period sessions will emphasize reflective listening and elicitation of affect. In contrast to CBT, therapists allow patients to determine the focus of each session, pulling for emotion, validating emotions when possible, and offering empathetic comments. Therapists will refrain from delineating any CBT theoretical framework and avoided cognitive and behavioral techniques that might overlap with CBT.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

ST

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Treatment designed to improve, reinforce, or sustain a patient's physiological well-being or psychological self-esteem and self-reliance

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CBT

CBT works by changing people's attitudes and their behavior by focusing on the thoughts, images, beliefs and attitudes that are held (a person's cognitive processes) and how these processes relate to the way a person behaves, as a way of dealing with emotional problems.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

ST

Treatment designed to improve, reinforce, or sustain a patient's physiological well-being or psychological self-esteem and self-reliance

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Supportive Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. generally medically and neurologically healthy, including no evidence of mental retardation or serious cognitive impairment that would interfere with protocol adherence and/or task performance
2. between the ages of 18 - 65 years old, inclusive
3. right-handed
4. primary diagnosis of MDD or gSAD based on the SCID DSM-5. Patients will be permitted to have limited comorbid and/or history of internalizing psychopathologies (e.g., generalized anxiety disorder, specific phobia, adjustment disorder)

Exclusion Criteria

1. personal current or past manic/hypomanic episode or psychotic symptoms
2. active suicidal ideation as determined by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
3. prior history of standard CBT (failure or success)
4. any current or recent (past 4 weeks) use of medication (prescription or non-prescription) with psychotropic effects
5. psychotherapy other than CBT or psychotropic medication use during the study
6. cognitive dysfunction (traumatic brain injury, mental retardation, dementia)
7. active moderate or severe alcohol and/or substance use disorders

For healthy controls: history or current Axis I disorder.


1. presence of ferrous-containing metals within the body (e.g., aneurysm clips, shrapnel/retained particles)
2. inability to tolerate small, enclosed spaces without anxiety (e.g., claustrophobia)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Illinois at Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Heide Klumpp

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Heide Klumpp, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Illinois at Chicago

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Illinois at Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Feurer C, Jimmy J, Bhaumik R, Duffecy J, Medrano GR, Ajilore O, Shankman SA, Langenecker SA, Craske MG, Phan KL, Klumpp H. Anterior cingulate cortex activation during attentional control as a transdiagnostic marker of psychotherapy response: a randomized clinical trial. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Jun;47(7):1350-1357. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01211-2. Epub 2021 Oct 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34718341 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01MH112705-01A1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

2017-0258

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

RCT of Psilocybin-assisted CBT for Depression
NCT07281352 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2