Validation of Mesopic and Photopic Contrast Vision Tests With Respect to Nighttime Driving Ability
NCT ID: NCT03169855
Last Updated: 2019-01-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
54 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-05-02
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
B) Background:
An intact mesopic vision and a glare sensitivity within a normal range are essential pre-requisites for safe driving at nighttime (DOG \& BVA, 2011). Anderson \& Holiday (1995) have shown that (simulated) opacities of the refractive media (with only minor effects on daytime visual acuity) induce a pronounced impairment of contrast sensitivity under nighttime conditions. Especially under glare conditions by the headlights of traffic on the opposite lane or by stationary street illumination, an impairment of the mesopic vision may cause traffic hazards. The prevalence of impairments of the central visual acuity, the mesopic vision and the glare sensitivity is significantly higher for subjects being involved in nighttime traffic accidents (Lachenmayr, 1998). Furthermore, these impairments occur more frequently in aged drivers and are, among others, related to an increase of age-related media opacities (Aulhorn \& Harms, 1970, Babizhayev, 2003). Due to the demographic change, the relevance of nighttime driving ability is increasing in the next years since more and more aged employees will participate at the motorized traffic at night.
The German Fahrerlaubnisverordnung (FEV i.e. driving license regulation) specifies pass/fail criteria with regard to mesopic vision and glare sensitivity. The luminance level during nighttime driving is usually between 0.01 and 1 cd/m\^2, and therefore can be attributed to the level of mesopic vision. However, over the last years, the attempt was made to introduce photopic contrast sensitivity test to diagnose nighttime driving ability (i.e. testing of contrast vision under daytime conditions without time consuming adaptation procedures). Current research aims at investigating the relationship between contrast tests under various luminance conditions (Wilhelm et al, 2013). It is questionable, whether photopic tests are at all reliable predictors with regard to nighttime driving (Gramberg-Danielsen et al., 1984, Hertenstein et al., Graefe´s Archive of Ophthalmology, 2016).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intermediate Vision in a Driving Simulator Environment: Comparison of the J&J EYHANCE With a Conventional Monofoc. IOL
NCT04059289
To Evaluate the Visual Performance After Bilateral Implantation of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses
NCT03223857
Visual Outcomes After Presbyopic Lens Exchange
NCT03790592
Night Driving Pilot
NCT00876278
Three Intraocular Lenses Designed to Improve Distance, Intermediate and Near Vision Following Lens Extraction
NCT01225952
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study will be subdivided in the following (three) parts:
Part 1: Validation of the Aalen driving simulator set-up (ten patients with incipient to moderate cataract, i.e. opacities of the human lens of varying localization and of various degree of expression in at least one eye and ten age- and gender-correlated ophthalmologically healthy control subjects will be enrolled) Part 1.1.: Comprehensive ophthalmological/optical examination (Aalen University of Applied Sciences) including a detailed ophthalmological and medical history.
Part 1.2.: Baseline driving simulator test under mesopic conditions with/without glare under simulated static/simulated driving conditions (Aalen University of Applied Sciences) Part 1.3.: Baseline on road test under mesopic conditions with/without glare, under on road static/on road driving conditions (Aalen University of Applied Sciences) (If possible, the sequence of Part 1.2. and Part 1.3. will be randomly assigned.)
Part 2: Advanced driving simulator test (twenty patients with incipient to moderate cataract, i.e. opacities of the human lens of varying localization and of various degree of expression in at least one eye and twenty age- and gender-correlated ophthalmologically healthy control subjects will be enrolled. Subjects being enrolled in Part 1, will be asked to participate also at Part 2 and Part 3.) Part 2.1.: Comprehensive ophthalmological/optical examination of all (newly) enrolled patients and subjects who have not already been examined in Part. 1.1. (Aalen University of Applied Sciences).
Part 2.2.: Advanced driving simulator test under photopic and under mesopic simulated driving with and without glare (Würzburg Institute for Traffic Sciences = WIVW) in order to investigate the influence of glare on the driving behavior
Part 3: Representative driving simulator test (The \[altogether fourty\] subjects, enrolled in Part 2, will be enrolled in this part of the study.) Driving simulator test under photopic and mesopic conditions in oder to investigate glare on representative driving situations. Driving performance will be evaluated highly-standardized and partially automated on different parameters of operational and tactical driving behavior (S.A.F.E., Würzburg Institute for Traffic Sciences = WIVW).
Pass/fail rates are specified as described in the related manuals of the instruments. With regard to visual acuity measurements and assessment of mesopic contrast vision without/with glare, results are rated according to DIN 58220 - Part 3/ISO 10938: If less than three out of five subsequent presentations of an eight-position LANDOLT C (with two oblique and three horizontal/vertical gap locations in random sequence) are correctly identified, the session is rated as failed. Overlooking/missing reactions to obstacles (pedestrian \[display dummy with dark clothing\]/wild boar at the right roadside) are rated as failed.
For mesopic contrast vision testing, single LANDOLT optotpyes (visual acuity level 0.1 = 2/20) with the contrast levels (1:2, 1:5 and 1:23, respectively, according to AULHORN/HARMS) are presented via the Optovist Instrument (Vistec, Inc., Manching/Germany) or via the head up display (HUD) of the simulator vehicle/on road vehicle.
Photopic and mesopic contrast vision tests (without glare) are repeated once in order to assess the test retest variability of the related test procedure.
1. LANDOLT C chart for presentation of high contrast optotypes according to DIN 58220 - Part 3/ISO 10938 (Visus GmbH, Stuttgart/Germany)
2. Assessment of low contrast visual acuity using FrACT (Freiburg Visual Acuity Test, internet version 3.8.1)
3. Assessment of photopic contrast sensitivity, using the MARS Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test (The Mars Perceptrix Corporation, NY 10514-2523,USA)
4. Assessment of mesopic contrast sensitivity, using the OPTOVIST (VISTEC, Manching/FRG)
5. Judgment of intraocular straylight, using the C-Quant (Straylight meter, OCULUS, Dutenhofen/FRG)
6. Classification of human crystalline lens opacities, using the BQ 900 slitlamp (HAAG-STREIT, Köniz/CH), digital photography with dilated pupils, applying the LOCS III score
7. Densitometry of the crystalline lens, using the Pentacam HR (OCULUS Inc., Dutenhofen/FRG)
8. Digital Fundus Photography with dilated pupils (WX3D fundus camera, KOWA Optimed Deutschland GmbH, Düsseldorf/FRG)
9. Aalen driving simulator: Two high performance VELVET planetarium projectors (Fa. ZEISS, Jena/FRG), AUDI A4 (AUDI Inc., Ingolstadt/FRG) with digital display and re-equipped (BFFT, Gaimersheim/FRG) with externally controllable head up display (HUD) for presentation of LANDOLT Cs with varying contrast levels, SILAB virtual reality environment (WIVW, Veitshöchheim/FRG), two mobile glare sources (LED arrays)
10. Aalen on road parcours: AUDI A4 (AUDI Inc., Ingolstadt/FRG) with digital display, with externally controllable head up display (HUD, VW AG, Wolfsburg/FRG)) for presentation of LANDOLT Cs with varying contrast levels and equipped with dual brake (VEIGEL GmbH + Co KG, Künzelsau/FRG)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Refractive media opacities: present
Refractive media opacities: present
No interventions assigned to this group
Refractive media opacities: absent
Refractive media opacities: absent
Slit lamp (LOCS III Score)
Diagnostic procedure only
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Slit lamp (LOCS III Score)
Diagnostic procedure only
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Minimum distant visual acuity (with habitual correction) 0.8 (16/20, single optotypes, LANDOLT C chart for presentation of high contrast optotypes according to DIN 58220 - Part 3/ISO 10938 (Visus GmbH, Stuttgart/Germany)
* ametropia maximum spherical ametropia sph ±8.00 dpt maximum maximum astigmatism cyl 2.00 dpt
* normal (age-corrected) visual field
* clear refractive media OR incipient to intermediate cataract
* informed consent
* amblyopia
* strabismus
* ocular motility disorders
* nystagmus
* double vision
* albinism
* glaucoma / IOP exceeding 22 mmHg
* shallow anterior chamber/risk of angle closure glaucoma (van HERICK grade less than 2)
* macular diseases / maculopathy
* diabetic retinopathy (blood sugar-related retinal disease)
* status post severe eye injuries
* eye surgery within the last three months (, related to the time point of recruitment)
* Infectious diseases (conjunctivitis, corneal inflammation, uveitis)
* very dry eyes (sicca symptoms)
* drugs inducing miosis
* any other eye disorders that affect the image quality
Exclusion Criteria
* drugs, interfering with reaction time and/or with visual acuity or with refractive status of the eye
* deficient driving license
* yearly mileage less than 3000 km/y (less than 1.864 miles/y)
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
DGUV (Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung/German Social Accident Insurance Institutions)
UNKNOWN
Study Course Ophthalmic Optics and Optometry, University of Applied Sciences Aalen
UNKNOWN
Study Course Mechatronics, University of Applied Sciences Aalen
UNKNOWN
Steinbeis Transferzentrum AWFE, University of Applied Sciences Aalen
UNKNOWN
Würzburg Institute for Traffic Sciences GmbH
UNKNOWN
Aalen University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ulrich Schiefer, Prof. Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Aalen University of Applied Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Applied Sciences, Study Course Ophthalmic Optics
Aalen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
F-2015-044#A1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.