Evaluating and Improving Functional Driving Vision of Patients With Astigmatism: Phase 3

NCT ID: NCT02950545

Last Updated: 2021-10-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

51 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-04-30

Study Completion Date

2017-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

It is a common clinical practice to leave small amounts of astigmatism uncorrected in contact lens wearers. Therefore, some drivers who have astigmatism and wear contact lenses may experience blur while driving. The purpose of this study is to determine if correcting small amounts of astigmatism with contact lenses will improve driving safety.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this randomized control trial is to compare visual performance and simulated driving performance of adults with astigmatism when wearing 1\*DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM (toric), 1\*DAY ACUVUE® MOIST (spherical control), and 1\*DAY ACUVUE® MOIST (placebo) contact lenses. Adult subjects with nearsightedness and astigmatism will wear three types of soft contact lenses (placebo, spherical and toric in randomized order). Each subject will read letters on standard eye charts and complete vision and driving tests in a driving simulator. Subjects will repeat these tests with each lens type. Analyses will include an ANOVA to look for a main effect of lens condition, and separate contrasts to compare toric vs. spherical, toric vs. placebo, and spherical vs. placebo lenses. Investigating the lenses under simulated driving conditions, which involve eye movement demands, will lend insight into the potential advantages of toric over spherical contact lenses for driving safety.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Astigmatism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo, Spherical, then Toric Lenses

Crossover order 1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo Lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

AcuVue Oasys Bandage Lenses with no prescription

Spherical Lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses

Toric Lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses

Placebo, Toric, then Spherical Lenses

Crossover order 2

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo Lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

AcuVue Oasys Bandage Lenses with no prescription

Spherical Lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses

Toric Lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses

Spherical, Placebo, then Toric Lenses

Crossover order 3

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo Lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

AcuVue Oasys Bandage Lenses with no prescription

Spherical Lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses

Toric Lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses

Spherical, Toric, then Placebo Lenses

Crossover order 4

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo Lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

AcuVue Oasys Bandage Lenses with no prescription

Spherical Lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses

Toric Lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses

Toric, Placebo, then Spherical Lenses

Crossover order 5

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo Lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

AcuVue Oasys Bandage Lenses with no prescription

Spherical Lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses

Toric Lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses

Toric, Spherical, then Placebo Lenses

Crossover order 6

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo Lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

AcuVue Oasys Bandage Lenses with no prescription

Spherical Lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses

Toric Lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placebo Lenses

AcuVue Oasys Bandage Lenses with no prescription

Intervention Type DEVICE

Spherical Lenses

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST contact lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

Toric Lenses

1-DAY ACUVUE® MOIST for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult licensed driver
* Ages 18-39 years
* Corrected vision of 20/40 or better in each eye
* Astigmatism between 0.75 and 1.75 diopters in each eye
* Nearsightedness between 0 and -9 diopters in each eye
* No active eye infection
* No defective peripheral vision
* No bifocal correction
* Routinely wears toric contact lenses (more than 4 times per week)
* Routinely drives a car (more than 4 times per week)
* No history of motion, sea, or big screen (e.g. IMAX) sickness, and no persistent Simulation Adaptation Syndrome

Exclusion Criteria

* Corrected vision worse than 20/40 in either eye
* No astigmatism in either eye
* Active eye infection
* Defective peripheral vision
* Wears bifocals
* Wears contact lenses less than 4 times per week
* Drives infrequently (less than 4 times per week)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

39 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Virginia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Daniel Cox, PhD

Professor, Departments of Psychiatry, Internal Medicine and Ophthalmology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Daniel J Cox, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Virginia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Virginia Driving Safety Laboratory

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cox DJ, Banton T, Record S, Grabman JH, Hawkins RJ. Does correcting astigmatism with toric lenses improve driving performance? Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Apr;92(4):404-11. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000554.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25946099 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18499

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.