Treatment by Therapeutic Body Wraps in Children and Adolescents Suffering From Autism With Severe Injurious Behavior.
NCT ID: NCT03164746
Last Updated: 2017-05-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-12-31
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Therapeutic body wraps has been reported in small series or case reports, but has never been assessed in the context of a randomized controlled trial.
The present study is an exploratory, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open label with blinded outcome assessment (PROBE design) trial of the effect of wet versus dry therapeutic body wraps in children presenting with autism spectrum disorder and severe injurious behavior.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Evaluation of Integrative Practices Units Infant and Child Care for Unit Children With Typical or Atypical Autism (AUTISM)
NCT02154828
Development and Validation of a System for the Anticipation of Challenging Behaviors
NCT05340608
A Controlled Trial of the Clinical Effects of Hyperbaric Therapy in Autistic Children
NCT00335790
Randomized Study of Intensive One-on-one Behavioral Treatment for Preschool Aged Children With Autism
NCT00004449
Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygenation Therapy on Adaptive, Aberrant and Stereotyped Behaviors in Children With Autism
NCT00404846
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of the present study is to evaluate the beneficial effect of wet versus dry therapeutic body wraps through an exploratory randomized controlled open label blinded outcome assessment approach.
The primary objective is the comparison of change in ABC irritability scores from baseline to 3 months between the two groups. According to the potential recruitment, we plan to recruit 30 subjects in each group. This sample size could allow us to detect a minimum effect size of 0.74 between the 2 groups (considered large in literature) with a power of 80% (two-sided test and type I error of 5%).
As described elsewhere, wet or dry session will be organized through twice-a-week sessions for a 3-month duration.
Comparison in primary outcome (ABC irritability score) between the 2 groups will be performed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for the baseline value. The standardized difference (effect size) will be computed taking into account the adjustment for baseline and its 95% confidence interval will be estimated using a bootstrap resampling. The validity of the ANCOVA model will be checked by examining the model residuals.
The same methodology will be used for the secondary outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DRY group
Dry sheet therapeutic body wraps will be conducted through twice-a-week sessions for a 3-month duration. Sessions take place in the same quiet room and they usually last 45 minutes each up to 1 hour depending on the patient's response. During sessions, the patient wearied a bathing suit. Sessions were conducted under the supervision of an occupational therapist and involved at least two members of the patient's care team.
Dry sheet Therapeutic body wraps
At the beginning of the session, the patient's consent to proceed was orally obtained, as no session was compulsory. The therapists checked behavioral manifestations of refusal. Then, the patient was first wrapped in Dry damp sheets (cold phase) and covered up with a rescue and a dry blanket. Afterward the body spontaneously warmed up (warm phase). The patient was then invited to freely express his feelings.
WET Group
Wet sheet therapeutic body wraps will be conducted through twice-a-week sessions for a 3-month duration. Sessions take place in the same quiet room and they usually last 45 minutes each up to 1 hour depending on the patient's response. During sessions, the patient wearied a bathing suit. Sessions were conducted under the supervision of an occupational therapist and involved at least two members of the patient's care team.
WET sheet Therapeutic body wraps
At the beginning of the session, the patient's consent to proceed was orally obtained, as no session was compulsory. The therapists checked behavioral manifestations of refusal. Then, the patient was first wrapped in wet damp sheets (cold phase) and covered up with a rescue and a dry blanket. Afterward the body spontaneously warmed up (warm phase). The patient was then invited to freely express his feelings.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dry sheet Therapeutic body wraps
At the beginning of the session, the patient's consent to proceed was orally obtained, as no session was compulsory. The therapists checked behavioral manifestations of refusal. Then, the patient was first wrapped in Dry damp sheets (cold phase) and covered up with a rescue and a dry blanket. Afterward the body spontaneously warmed up (warm phase). The patient was then invited to freely express his feelings.
WET sheet Therapeutic body wraps
At the beginning of the session, the patient's consent to proceed was orally obtained, as no session was compulsory. The therapists checked behavioral manifestations of refusal. Then, the patient was first wrapped in wet damp sheets (cold phase) and covered up with a rescue and a dry blanket. Afterward the body spontaneously warmed up (warm phase). The patient was then invited to freely express his feelings.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* presenting severe behavioural disturbances such as hetero and self-injurious behaviours, automutilation, severe motor hyperactivity, severe stereotypies.
* having a systematically consultation by a neuro pediatric.
Exclusion Criteria
* patients with stabilized seizure condition, antiepileptic medication should be stable for at least 4 weeks.
5 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ministry of Health, France
OTHER_GOV
University Hospital, Lille
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pierre Delion, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Lille
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre de Santé Mentale Angevin
Angers, , France
Centre Hospitalier d'Arras
Arras, , France
Centre Hospitalier Robert Ballanger
Aulnay-sous-Bois, , France
Centre Hospitalier Montfavet
Avignon, , France
Institut Départemental Albert Calmette
Camiers, , France
Centre Hospitalier de Douai
Douai, , France
Etablissement Public de Santé Roger Prévot
Gennevilliers, , France
Centre Hospitalier de Lens
Lens, , France
Hôpital Fontan, CHRU
Lille, , France
Institut Médico-éducatif
Montigny-en-Ostrevent, , France
Etablissement de Santé Maison Blanche
Paris, , France
Groupe Hospitalier Pitier-Salpêtrière
Paris, , France
Etablissement Public de Santé Mentale Val de Lys-Artois
Saint-Venant, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Delion P, Labreuche J, Deplanque D, Cohen D, Duhamel A, Lallie C, Ravary M, Goeb JL, Medjkane F, Xavier J; Therapeutic Body Wrap Study group. Therapeutic body wraps (TBW) for treatment of severe injurious behaviour in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD): A 3-month randomized controlled feasibility study. PLoS One. 2018 Jun 29;13(6):e0198726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198726. eCollection 2018.
Huang HF, Tian JL, Yang XT, Sun L, Hu RY, Yan ZH, Li SS, Xie Q, Tian XB. Efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin after knee arthroscopy: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018 Jun 21;13(6):e0197868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197868. eCollection 2018.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2007-A01376-47
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
DGS 2008-0070
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2007/0715
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.