Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy or Intensity Modulated Radiation/Proton Therapy in Treating Patients With Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer
NCT ID: NCT03164460
Last Updated: 2025-09-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
SUSPENDED
PHASE2
68 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-05-22
2027-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
3-5 FrAction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Palliation of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: the FAST Phase II Randomized Trial
NCT05674396
Image-guided Proton Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Unresectable Head and Neck Cancer
NCT04870840
Fractionated Radiation Therapy in Treating Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
NCT00771641
Image-Guided, Intensity-Modulated Photon or Proton Beam Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage II-IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT01629498
INRT-AIR: A Prospective Phase II Study of Involved Nodal Radiation Therapy
NCT03953976
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To compare the 2-year rate of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)-4.0 grade 3 or higher toxicity at 2 years between the two treatment arms.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare the 2-year locoregional failure free survival (LFFS) in patients being treated with reirradiation with either stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SBRT) versus intensity modulated radiation therapy/intensity modulated proton therapy (IMRT/IMPT).
II. To determine if there is any difference in local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival between the two arms.
III. To compare toxicity using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)-4.0 and Performance Status Scale-HN (Head and Neck).
IV. To compare patient reported outcome (PRO) measures of symptoms using MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-HN, ACT-HN Symptom Index (FACT-HNSI), MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT), for skull base only, Anterior Skull BASE Questionnaire (ASBQ), for skull base only, Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS), Performance Status Scale For Head and Neck Cancer Patients (PSS-HN), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem version (V)2.0 (WPAI:SHP), and University of Michigan Xerostomia-Related Quality of Life Scale, Xerostomia and Health Questionnaire (European Quality of Life Five Dimension Three Level \[EQ-5D-3L\]).
V. Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years (QALY) comparison between IMPT and IMRT. VI. Compare cost-benefit economic analysis of treatment. VII. Perform dosimetric analysis and compare correlates of critical structures.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess potential differences between patients on study and patients who were considered eligible for randomized, were randomized to a treatment arm, but may have dropped out of the study for other reasons after being randomized to; or were denied insurance coverage for the treatment arm she/he was randomized.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized into 1 of 2 groups.
GROUP I: Patients undergo SBRT every other day for a total of 5 treatments.
GROUP II: Patients undergo IMRT/IMPT once daily (Monday-Friday) for up to 30-35 treatments.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 2-3 months, every 3 months for 1 year, and then every 3-4 months for up to 2 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group I (SBRT)
Patients undergo SBRT every other day for a total of 5 treatments.
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
Undergo SBRT
Group II (IMRT/IMPT)
Patients undergo IMRT/IMPT once daily (Monday-Friday) for up to 30-35 treatments.
Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
Undergo IMRT/IMPT
Proton Radiation
Undergo IMRT/IMPT
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
Undergo IMRT/IMPT
Proton Radiation
Undergo IMRT/IMPT
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
Undergo SBRT
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Not eligible for surgery for recurrence or poor surgical candidate
* Gross disease apparent on imaging (magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\] or computed tomography \[CT\])
* 1-3 sites of recurrence (\< 60 cc per site, total volume \< 100 cc)
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) = 0, 1, or 2
* Negative pregnancy test for women of child bearing potential
Exclusion Criteria
* Clinically significant uncontrolled major cardiac, respiratory, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal or hematologic disease but not limited to:
* a) Symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina, or cardiac dysrhythmia not controlled by pacer device
* b) No myocardial infarction within 3 months of registration
* Widely metastatic disease (oligometastatic disease acceptable)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jack Phan
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2018-01190
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2016-1065
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2016-1065
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.