Toothbrush Wear and Its Effect on Subgingival Inflammation Using Two Different Brushing Techniques
NCT ID: NCT03158350
Last Updated: 2019-03-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-08-03
2016-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
At Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (TUSDM), a modification of the Bass intrasulcular technique is advocated to many students. We call this modification of the Bass technique a Stationary Bristle Technique (SBT), which is an intrasulcular technique that maintains the toothbrush bristle ends essentially stationary on the tooth cervically and in the gingival crevice.
In this study, half of the participants were taught the Stationary Bristle Technique Group, while the other half were not be provided with instructions, but asked to brush as normal (non-interventional group) throughout the duration of the study.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sulcular Bristle Tip Technique (SBTT) With an Electric Toothbrush
NCT04427397
The Effect of Instructed Dental Flossing on Interdental Gingival Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT04218994
Evaluation of Toothbrush Bristles in Plaque Reduction
NCT04681885
Effectiveness of Toothbrushing Techniques in Plaque Removal and Caries Lesion Control
NCT01501357
Comparing the Inter-dental Brush to Dental Floss
NCT00743548
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Gingival inflammation is evidenced by the percentage (%) sites with Bleeding on Probing (BoP). The primary time-point will be at 4 weeks.
The amount of toothbrush bristle deformation at 4 weeks, 12, and 16 weeks of brushing with a SBT and with a NSBT will also be evaluated. 3. The secondary evaluation of BoP will be at the 12 and 16 week time-point.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stationary Bristle Technique (SBT)
Instructed brushing method. Participants are asked to brush twice daily, for 2 minutes at a time, following instructions for the Stationary Bristle Technique.
Instructed Brushing Method
Stationary Bristle Technique
Non-Stationary Bristle Technique (NSBT)
The control group will be asked to brush twice daily, for 2 minutes at a time, following their normal toothbrushing technique.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Instructed Brushing Method
Stationary Bristle Technique
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects must have at least 20 teeth
* Subjects must have had a professional dental prophylaxis done in the 3 months prior to the beginning of the study
* Subjects exhibiting 10% or greater BoP at the baseline examination
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects who smoke (=more than 0 cigarettes a day)
* Subjects who received antibiotic treatment during the month prior to the beginning of the study
* Subjects who have cervical probing depth (PD) greater than 3mm
* Subjects diagnosed with periodontal disease at any site as defined bleeding on probing with cervical probing depths greater than 3 mm and loss of cervical attachment.
* Subjects who are currently pregnant (self-report).
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tufts University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paul A Levi, Jr., DMD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
TUSDM
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
11724
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.