Pediatric Ward Discharge Quality Improvement

NCT ID: NCT03153722

Last Updated: 2021-04-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

5478 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-15

Study Completion Date

2020-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will utilize an iterative quality improvement process to identify and address delays in the pediatric hospital discharge process.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hospital crowding has been associated with increased hospital length of stay in pediatric populations and adverse outcomes in adult populations. This study focuses on a 36-bed general pediatric inpatient care unit whose occupancy has seen exponential growth over the past several years. With the growth in patient population, the study hospital is experiencing increasing difficulty with hospital crowding, particularly during key times of year, such as the winter viral respiratory season. During these times, pediatric patients may experience high emergency room wait times, and admitted patients may be required to board in the emergency room or post-anesthesia care unit while they await an inpatient bed. Lack of inpatient bed availability has also, at times, required cancellation of surgical cases and denial of outside hospital patient transfers to the institution, resulting in inconvenience to patients and delays in care.

The pediatric hospital discharge process has come under particular scrutiny as an area in which both the efficiency and the effectiveness of patient care can be improved. Currently, around 10% of patients ready for discharge in a given day from the general pediatric hospitalist service are discharged prior to noon, freeing up this bed space for a new patient. While for some patients, discharge is postponed for medical reasons, others must remain in the hospital for non-medical delays. For example, they may remain hospitalized because they have not yet been seen by a physician, their medications are not available for pick-up from the pharmacy, or they do not have transportation from hospital to home. Several studies in pediatric populations have shown that quality improvement processes can improve discharge efficiency without compromising care quality or patient/family satisfaction. The investigators aim to determine if an iterative quality improvement process can reduce barriers to discharge and therefore decrease pediatric patients' length of stay. They will simultaneously analyze several secondary outcomes to evaluate patient flow, patient/family satisfaction, and subsequent hospital utilization to evaluate for unintended consequences of the interventions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pediatric Hospitalization

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pediatric discharge process intervention

All patients hospitalized on the pediatric ward under the pediatric hospitalist service will participate in pediatric discharge process interventions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pediatric discharge process interventions

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

As this is an iterative quality improvement process, interventions will be evidence-based and chosen to test effectiveness for addressing areas of discharge bottlenecks or inefficiency within our specific hospital's context. Examples of possible interventions may include implementation of a discharge risk assessment (as in Statile et al, Pediatrics 2016), institution of a "medications-in-hand" policy on hospital discharge (as in Sauers-Ford et al, Pediatrics 2016), or initiation of a ward discharge coordinator who will help coordinate outpatient follow-up for patients. Interventions will be implemented in a stepwise fashion, utilizing successive plan-do-study-act cycles, with a minimum 2 month period between interventions to monitor outcomes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pediatric discharge process interventions

As this is an iterative quality improvement process, interventions will be evidence-based and chosen to test effectiveness for addressing areas of discharge bottlenecks or inefficiency within our specific hospital's context. Examples of possible interventions may include implementation of a discharge risk assessment (as in Statile et al, Pediatrics 2016), institution of a "medications-in-hand" policy on hospital discharge (as in Sauers-Ford et al, Pediatrics 2016), or initiation of a ward discharge coordinator who will help coordinate outpatient follow-up for patients. Interventions will be implemented in a stepwise fashion, utilizing successive plan-do-study-act cycles, with a minimum 2 month period between interventions to monitor outcomes.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children or young adults less than 21 years of age admitted to the University of California Davis Children's Hospital Pediatric Hospitalist Service on the general pediatric inpatient ward

Exclusion Criteria

* Adults greater than 21 years of age, including those unable to consent
* Pregnant women
* Prisoners
* Children admitted to other services (i.e. Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, Pediatric Surgery, Pediatric Gastroenterology, Trauma, Pediatric Nephrology, Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Newborn Nursery, etc.)
Maximum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, Davis

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California Davis

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lorch SA, Millman AM, Zhang X, Even-Shoshan O, Silber JH. Impact of admission-day crowding on the length of stay of pediatric hospitalizations. Pediatrics. 2008 Apr;121(4):e718-30. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1280.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18381501 (View on PubMed)

Kostis WJ, Demissie K, Marcella SW, Shao YH, Wilson AC, Moreyra AE; Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System (MIDAS 10) Study Group. Weekend versus weekday admission and mortality from myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 15;356(11):1099-109. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa063355.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17360988 (View on PubMed)

Bell CM, Redelmeier DA. Mortality among patients admitted to hospitals on weekends as compared with weekdays. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 30;345(9):663-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa003376.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11547721 (View on PubMed)

Beck MJ, Gosik K. Redesigning an inpatient pediatric service using Lean to improve throughput efficiency. J Hosp Med. 2015 Apr;10(4):220-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2300. Epub 2014 Dec 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25483409 (View on PubMed)

Statile AM, Schondelmeyer AC, Thomson JE, Brower LH, Davis B, Redel J, Hausfeld J, Tucker K, White DL, White CM. Improving Discharge Efficiency in Medically Complex Pediatric Patients. Pediatrics. 2016 Aug;138(2):e20153832. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3832. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27412640 (View on PubMed)

White CM, Statile AM, White DL, Elkeeb D, Tucker K, Herzog D, Warrick SD, Warrick DM, Hausfeld J, Schondelmeyer A, Schoettker PJ, Kiessling P, Farrell M, Kotagal U, Ryckman FC. Using quality improvement to optimise paediatric discharge efficiency. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 May;23(5):428-36. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002556. Epub 2014 Jan 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24470173 (View on PubMed)

Sauers-Ford HS, Moore JL, Guiot AB, Simpson BE, Clohessy CR, Yost D, Mayhaus DC, Simmons JM, Gosdin CH. Local Pharmacy Partnership to Prevent Pediatric Asthma Reutilization in a Satellite Hospital. Pediatrics. 2016 Apr;137(4):e20150039. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0039. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26983469 (View on PubMed)

Hamline MY, Rutman L, Tancredi DJ, Rosenthal JL; UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL DISCHARGE QUALITY IMPROVEMENT WORKING GROUP. An Iterative Quality Improvement Process Improves Pediatric Ward Discharge Efficiency. Hosp Pediatr. 2020 Mar;10(3):214-221. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2019-0158. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32051222 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1016479

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.