Early Tapering of Immunosuppressive Agents to Immunomodulation to Improve Survival of AML Patients
NCT ID: NCT03150134
Last Updated: 2017-05-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-01-01
2021-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
single-center, open clinical study
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sequential Intensive Chemotherapy Followed by RIC for Refractory and Relapse AML
NCT01496547
Sequential Conditioning in Haploidentical Transplantation for Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT03035422
S0125, Chemotherapy, Total-Body Irradiation, and Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT00053014
HLA-mismatched MST vs HLA-matched NST for AML in Intermediate-risk
NCT02461121
HLA-mismatched Microtransplantation for High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT01484171
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
However, several retrospective studies have reported long-term survival rates only of 10% to 40% for patients with AML not in remission at the time of allo-HSCT. Michel Duval et al reported that leukemia progression was the single most frequent cause of failure( 42% for AML) for these patients with advanced disease. It is widely accepted that advanced disease status at transplantation is a significant adverse-risk factor for post-HSCT relapse. Thus, how to improve the recurrence rate of these advanced patients after transplantation is still the main problem.
Dose intensity is a main cause for relapse. In order to improve the outcome of allo-HSCT for advanced leukemia, many scholars design the intensified conditioning or the sequential strategy of cytoreductive chemotherapy followed immediately by intensified myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens.With increasing dosage, the chance of relapse decreases but the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and non-relapse mortality(NRM) increase. How to well-balance NRM versus relapse is still the subject of much debate and investigation. So many centers developed reduced intensity conditioning(RIC) regimens based on the combination of alkylating agents with a purine analog and TBI, whereby the dose of TBI or the alkylating agent is usually reduced by at least 30% compared with a conventional ablative regimen. And an increased dose of alkylating agents as part of RIC may be associated with better leukemia free survival and the lower NRM.
Apart from the conditioning regimen, curative potential of allo-HSCT is largely based on immune-mediated graft-versus-leukemia(GvL)effects caused by donor T cells contained in the graft. The occurrence of GvHD is thought to be associated with a GvL effect. Since 1990, it has been known that leukemic relapses after allo-HSCT can be successfully treated by the induction of a GvL reaction. Strategies of adoptive immunotherapy such as donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) and withdrawal of immunosuppression are proved to be able to enhance GvL effects. Many results show that the clinical benefit is limited to a minority of patients relapsed posttransplant, so new strategies such as prophylactic DLI (pDLI) before overt relapse is used in many center. But the results is varied from each centers. Liga M et reported that Patients with leukemia who received low-dose pDLI after allo-HSCT is associated with a relatively high incidence of severe GvHD. Furthermore, finding matched unrelated donors(MUD) again in a timely manner may be difficult and limit access to this treatment and the DLI process itself is more complicated.
Cyclosporine(CsA) withdrawal is generally accepted as first-line treatment in patients with relapse after allo-HSCT. In some studies, the early withdrawal of immunosuppression even in the absence of DLI, can prevent overt morphologic relapse in advanced patients.. AH Elmaagacli et al studied the immunomodulating effect of withdrawal of immunosuppression, the result showed that a probability of 10% for achieving and remaining in remission with AML 3 years after relapse posttransplant, patients with advanced CML and ALL had no chance of achieving and remaining in remission in the same time period. The best results have been seen in CML in early relapse. F Rosenow et al showed that low-tumor burden, defined by the blast count in BM aspirates, is one of the important prognostic factors for successful immune intervention. In a retrospective analysis, Sairafi et al also demonstrated that early immune intervention in case of impending relapse was more effective compared with late intervention after overt relapse. Since withdrawing immunosuppression allows for increased GvL effects, prevention may be the most feasible and effective means of managing relapse after allo-HSCT. On the basis of these results, we designed a prospective clinical study to decrease relapse risk in patients achieving CR with early reduction of immunosuppressive agents.As usual,during the first month, blood CsA levels were kept at 100-150 ng/mL in patients with sibling donors and 200-300 ng/mL in patients with a matched unrelated donors (MUD) and mismatched related donors(haplo-SCT). In the absence of GVHD, CsA was discontinued after 3-4 months when HLA-identical sibling donors were used and after 6 months when unrelated donors were used.In this clinical study,immunosuppressive agents were adjusted according to the schedule. Usually in the absence of GvHD, immunosuppressive agents were gradually reduced by 6 weeks and discontinued in three months after transplant in the advanced patients even if complete donor chimerism (CDC) achieved in matched unrelated donors(MUD) while immunosuppressive agents were gradually reduced by 2 months and discontinued in four months after transplant in the advanced patients in haploidentical SCT. If donor chimerism had not achieved CDC with no significant acute GVHD at four weeks after HSCT, immunosuppressive agents were gradually reduced. If GvHD was present during the time of immunosuppressive agents reduction, CsA was added again and tapering was done over longer periods. Immunosuppressive agents were regularly reduced by 3 months and discontinued in the 5 months without GvHD in the CR group. We used the result of chimerism as the reference. The key point in this clinicaltrial was emphasizing the early reduction of immunosuppressive agents according to the time point after transplant and the clinical symptoms. The ultimate goal of therapy is to minimize GvHD while maintaining GvL effects in order to enhance long-term disease control in the advanced patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
early reduction
Usually in the absence of GvHD, immunosuppressive drugs(Cyclosporine) were gradually reduced by 6 weeks and discontinued in three months after transplant in the advanced patients while immunosuppressive agents were gradually reduced by 2 months and discontinued in four months after transplant in the advanced patients in haploidentical SCT even if complete donor chimerism (CDC) achieved. If donor chimerism had not achieved CDC with no significant acute GVHD at four weeks after HSCT, immunosuppressive agents were gradually reduced. If GvHD was present during the time of immunosuppressive agents reduction, CsA was added again and tapering was done over longer periods.
Cyclosporine
Patients with advanced AML received early tapering of immunosuppressive drugs(Cyclosporine)
routine reduction
Arm/Group Descriptions.Immunosuppressive drugs(cyclosporine) were routine reduced by 3 months and discontinued in the 5 months without GvHD in the CR group. We used the result of chimerism as the reference.
routine reduction of immunosuppressive drugs(cyclosporine)
patients with AML in CR were given the routine reduction of immunosuppressive drugs(cyclosporine)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cyclosporine
Patients with advanced AML received early tapering of immunosuppressive drugs(Cyclosporine)
routine reduction of immunosuppressive drugs(cyclosporine)
patients with AML in CR were given the routine reduction of immunosuppressive drugs(cyclosporine)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Absence of any other contraindications of stem cell transplantation. Willingness and ability to perform HSCT. Signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient (or legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the trial prior to enrollment.
Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plans, laboratory tests, and other study procedures.
Exclusion Criteria
Uncontrolled infection. Pregnancy or breastfeeding. Has enrolled in anther clinical trials Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or study drug administration, or may interfere with the interpretation of study results, and in the judgment of the investigator would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yang Jun
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
xinpeng wang, doctor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Shanghai First People's HOSPITAL
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Grigg AP, Szer J, Beresford J, Dodds A, Bradstock K, Durrant S, Schwarer AP, Hughes T, Herrmann R, Gibson J, Arthur C, Matthews J. Factors affecting the outcome of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for adult patients with refractory or relapsed acute leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 1999 Nov;107(2):409-18. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01713.x.
Zander AR, Dicke KA, Keating M, Vellekoop L, Culbert S, Spitzer G, Kanojia M, Jagannath S, Schell S, Hester J, et al. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for acute leukemia refractory to induction chemotherapy. Cancer. 1985 Sep 15;56(6):1374-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850915)56:63.0.co;2-c.
Duval M, Klein JP, He W, Cahn JY, Cairo M, Camitta BM, Kamble R, Copelan E, de Lima M, Gupta V, Keating A, Lazarus HM, Litzow MR, Marks DI, Maziarz RT, Rizzieri DA, Schiller G, Schultz KR, Tallman MS, Weisdorf D. Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for acute leukemia in relapse or primary induction failure. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug 10;28(23):3730-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.8852. Epub 2010 Jul 12.
Schmid C, Schleuning M, Ledderose G, Tischer J, Kolb HJ. Sequential regimen of chemotherapy, reduced-intensity conditioning for allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, and prophylactic donor lymphocyte transfusion in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5675-87. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.061.
Liu QF, Fan ZP, Zhang Y, Jiang ZJ, Wang CY, Xu D, Sun J, Xiao Y, Tan H. Sequential intensified conditioning and tapering of prophylactic immunosuppressants for graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for refractory leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Nov;15(11):1376-85. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.06.017. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
Liga M, Triantafyllou E, Tiniakou M, Lambropoulou P, Karakantza M, Zoumbos NC, Spyridonidis A. High alloreactivity of low-dose prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion in patients with acute leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with an alemtuzumab-containing conditioning regimen. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Jan;19(1):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.07.021. Epub 2012 Aug 4.
Elmaagacli AH, Beelen DW, Trenn G, Schmidt O, Nahler M, Schaefer UW. Induction of a graft-versus-leukemia reaction by cyclosporin A withdrawal as immunotherapy for leukemia relapsing after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999 Apr;23(8):771-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701672.
Rosenow F, Berkemeier A, Krug U, Muller-Tidow C, Gerss J, Silling G, Groth C, Wieacker P, Bogdanova N, Mesters R, Buchner T, Kienast J, Berdel WE, Stelljes M. CD34(+) lineage specific donor cell chimerism for the diagnosis and treatment of impending relapse of AML or myelodysplastic syndrome after allo-SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Aug;48(8):1070-6. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2013.2. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
Sairafi D, Remberger M, Uhlin M, Ljungman P, Ringden O, Mattsson J. Leukemia lineage-specific chimerism analysis and molecular monitoring improve outcome of donor lymphocyte infusions. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 Dec;16(12):1728-37. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.06.005. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
Yang J, Cai Y, Jiang J, Wan L, Bai H, Zhu J, Li S, Wang C, Song X. Early tapering of immunosuppressive agents after HLA-matched donor transplantation can improve the survival of patients with advanced acute myeloid leukemia. Ann Hematol. 2018 Mar;97(3):497-507. doi: 10.1007/s00277-017-3204-6. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017KY21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.