Comparison Between Lidocaine Inhalation and Intravenous Dexamethasone in Reducing Pain After Laryngeal Mask Insertion

NCT ID: NCT03139591

Last Updated: 2017-08-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

196 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-11-01

Study Completion Date

2017-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy between lidocaine inhalation vs intravenous dexamethasone to reduce pain after laryngeal mask insertion

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Approval from Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia was acquired prior conducting the study. Subjects were given informed consent before enrolling the study and randomized into two groups (Lidocaine inhalation and Intravenous dexamethasone group). Intravenous (IV) cannula (18 or 20 G) , non-invasive blood pressure monitor, and pulse-oxymetry had been set on the subjects 10 minutes before anesthesia began. Vital signs were recorded. Lidocaine group received 1.5 mg/kg body weight (BW) of 2% lidocaine inhalation, diluted with 2-3 ml of normal saline until the total volume was 6 ml, and intravenous normal saline injection. Dexamethasone group received normal saline inhalation and 10 mg of intravenous dexamethasone. Subjects, authors, or inhalation giver were not aware of the content of any drug given. Coinduction was done using 0.05mg/kg BW of midazolam and 2mcg/kg BW of fentanyl 5 minutes before the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion. Induction was done using 2 mg/kg BW of 1% propofol and 0.5 mg/kg BW of atracurium 3 minutes before LMA insertion. Subjects were then given oxygenation using face mask without oropharyngeal airway. LMA was lubricated with normal saline. After 3 minutes of oxygenation, LMA was inserted using standard method. The LMA cuff was inflated with cuff pressure gauge of approximately 40 mmHg. After the position of LMA was confirmed to be correct, fixation was done using a tape. Maintenance of anesthesia was done using 50% oxygen in compressed air, 1% isoflurane, and atracurium. Thirty minutes before the surgery ended, 1 gram of paracetamol was given in 15 minutes as post-surgery analgetic. After the surgery was ended, subjects were given 0.04 mg/kg BW of neostigmine and 0.02 mg/kg BW of atropine. Mucus suction was performed on oropharynx and oral cavity gently, by using suction catheter 12F when subjects were still under anesthesia. After spontaneous breaths occured, LMA cuff was deflated and LMA was removed. Ventilation was continued using face mask without oropharyngeal airway. At the recovery room, pain on throat was assessed using Numerical Rating Scale. Assessment was done 2 hours after surgery in the recovery room after subjects were fully alert with Aldrette score of 10. Throat pain was assessed during rest or swallowing. In addition, subjects were asked whether or not they experienced difficulty in swallowing or hoarseness.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery With General Anesthesia and LMA Insertion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

lidocaine inhalation

Lidocaine inhalation group: 1.5 mg/kg body weight (BW) of 2% lidocaine inhalation, diluted with 2-3 ml of normal saline until the total volume was 6 ml, and intravenous normal saline injection

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

lidocaine inhalation; intravenous dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

1.5 mg/kg body weight (BW) of 2% lidocaine inhalation, diluted with 2-3 ml of normal saline until the total volume was 6 ml, and intravenous normal saline injection; Intravenous dexamethasone group: normal saline inhalation and 10 mg of intravenous dexamethasone.

intravenous dexamethasone

Intravenous dexamethasone group: normal saline inhalation and 10 mg of intravenous dexamethasone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

lidocaine inhalation; intravenous dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

1.5 mg/kg body weight (BW) of 2% lidocaine inhalation, diluted with 2-3 ml of normal saline until the total volume was 6 ml, and intravenous normal saline injection; Intravenous dexamethasone group: normal saline inhalation and 10 mg of intravenous dexamethasone.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

lidocaine inhalation; intravenous dexamethasone

1.5 mg/kg body weight (BW) of 2% lidocaine inhalation, diluted with 2-3 ml of normal saline until the total volume was 6 ml, and intravenous normal saline injection; Intravenous dexamethasone group: normal saline inhalation and 10 mg of intravenous dexamethasone.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients aged 20-59 years old, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I-II who were planned to undergo any elective surgery at operating room in general anesthesia and needed LMA insertion
* Mallampati class I or II
* subjects had been explained about the study, and agreed to enroll and have signed the informed consent form
* Subjects without history of throat pain

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects with cardiovascular disease, history of analgetic and steroid before surgery, surgical site of neck, oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx
* Subjects with upper respiratory tract infection
* Subjects with history of drug allergy used in the trial and possibility of difficult airway
* Pregnant, obese, active smoking, uncontrolled diabetic and hypertension subjects
* Subjects with history of peptic ulcer disease.

Dropout Criteria:

* Subjects whose LMA insertion attempts more than once
* Subjects with surgery duration \> 150 minutes
* Subjects who needed mechanical ventilation after surgery, subjects who vomitted
* Subjects whose LMA converted to endotracheal tube during surgery
* Subjects who received additional opioid during surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

59 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Indonesia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Susilo Chandra

Anesthesiologist Consultant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cipto Mangunkusumo Central National Hospital

Central Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Indonesia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

An J, Shin SK, Kim KJ. Laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults: comparison between fully deflated and partially inflated technique. Yonsei Med J. 2013 May 1;54(3):747-51. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.3.747.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23549825 (View on PubMed)

Seet E, Yousaf F, Gupta S, Subramanyam R, Wong DT, Chung F. Use of manometry for laryngeal mask airway reduces postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events: a prospective, randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2010 Mar;112(3):652-7. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181cf4346.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20179502 (View on PubMed)

Uzture N, Menda F, Bilgen S, Keskin O, Temur S, Koner O. The Effect of Flurbiprofen on Postoperative Sore Throat and Hoarseness After LMA-ProSeal Insertion: A Randomised, Clinical Trial. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2014 Jun;42(3):123-7. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2014.35693. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27366405 (View on PubMed)

Sun L, Guo R, Sun L. Dexamethasone for preventing postoperative sore throat: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ir J Med Sci. 2014 Dec;183(4):593-600. doi: 10.1007/s11845-013-1057-0. Epub 2013 Dec 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24357270 (View on PubMed)

Study Documents

Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.

Document Type: Textbook

Problems. In: Brimacombe JR. Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia principles and practice. London: Saunders Ltd, 2004;551-71.

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IndonesiaUAnes014

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dexmedetomidine in Non-intubated VATS
NCT05863416 RECRUITING PHASE4