Evaluation of the Patient-ventilator Asynchrony During Mechanical Ventilation for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Failure

NCT ID: NCT03138148

Last Updated: 2017-05-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-05-26

Study Completion Date

2017-01-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The synchronization between the patient and the ventilator is an essential objective during mechanical ventilation (MV). Maintaining the patient's respiratory activity during MV reduces ventilation pressures, improves oxygenation, and decreases sedation. In order to do this, the inspiratory or expiratory effort of the patient must be detected by the respirator' sensor systems, so that the assistance delivered by the respirator is coordinated with the patient's respiratory cycles. The usual systems do not actually detect the beginning of the effort but its result: variation in flow rate or pressure at the respirator circuit, which depends on the patient's respiratory mechanics and sensitivity of the sensor. This detection is currently imperfect, which generates asynchrony between the patient's needs and the assistance of the respirator. The asynchrony comprises the periods of delay between the beginning of the inspiration (or expiration) and the response of the respirator, but also of the unsuitable cycles: inspiratory efforts of the patient not detected by the respirator, or inversely triggering assistance in the absence of inspiration by the patient (self-initiation), or delivery of 2 cycles of assistance for a single inspiration (double triggering).

Asynchrony is a risk factor for prolonged mechanical ventilation in adults. Adult studies have shown that patient-ventilator asynchrony is common during MV, and is associated with prolonged MV duration. An association with length of stay in intensive care and in hospital was also observed. In children, patient-ventilator synchronization is more difficult to achieve than in adults due to a higher respiratory rate and smaller current volumes. The impact of patient-ventilator asynchrony on evolution has not been studied in pediatrics.

Patient-ventilator synchronization could be improved by the development of new ventilatory modes. The new NAVA (neurally adjusted ventilatory assist) ventilation mode detects the patient's breathing efforts earlier by monitoring the electrical activity of the diaphragm through the esophagus. This new mode seems to improve synchronization in children. NAVA ventilation may therefore be a step forward, but its clinical benefits remain to be seen.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of patient-ventilator asynchrony on the duration of mechanical ventilation in children with acute respiratory failure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mechanical Ventilation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Severe patient-ventilator asynchrony

Patients in whom the total percentage of time spent in asynchrony is superior to the entire cohort's 75th percentile

Routine mechanical ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

Routine mechanical ventilation in PICU amid children with acute respiratory failure

less severe patient-ventilator asynchrony

Patients in whom the total percentage of time spent in asynchrony is inferior to the entire cohort's 75th percentile

Routine mechanical ventilation

Intervention Type OTHER

Routine mechanical ventilation in PICU amid children with acute respiratory failure

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Routine mechanical ventilation

Routine mechanical ventilation in PICU amid children with acute respiratory failure

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Mechanical ventilation planned for more than 24h according to the physician in charge;
* Presence of a spontaneous respiratory activity (defined by the presence of respiratory cycles activated by the patient);
* Parental consent obtained with the parents or with the legal representative.

Exclusion Criteria

* pathologies for which a long and difficult weaning of the mechanical ventilation is expected: chronic respiratory failure with history of ventilation superior to one month, severe neurological or muscular pathology;
* Patients with a tracheotomy;
* Patients receiving a treatment by curare;
* Contraindication of recording of the diaphragmatic activity by oesophageal way, in particular recent oesophageal surgery, oesophageal stenosis, suspicion of diaphragmatic paralysis, severe coagulation disorder;
* Patients to whom a death seems imminent;
* Patients for whom a limitation of the care was considered.
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Month

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St. Justine's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Guillaume Emeriaud

Principal Investigator, Intensivist, Clinical Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St. Justine's Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHUSJ-3113

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.