Tissue Microarrays (TMAs) Construction in Lung Cancer Samples
NCT ID: NCT03136523
Last Updated: 2019-03-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
324 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-03-31
2018-09-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Tissue Samples From Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Enrolled on Research Study CALGB-140202
NCT00990873
Testing of DNA Extracted From Tumor Tissue Biopsy Samples Using Therascreen KRAS RGQ PCR Kit
NCT05360225
Validation of Molecular Diagnostic Assays to Detect Cancer Biomarkers in Blood and Primary Tumor in HNSCC/NSCLC/Melanoma
NCT04490564
Clinical Study Testing DNA Extracted From Tumour Tissue Biopsy Samples, Using the Therascreen® KRAS RGQ PCR Kit
NCT05347797
Molecular Profiling in Prostate Cancer
NCT04983628
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The research hypothesis is reflected in the primary objective of this study, which is to further evaluate the prognostic and predictive significance of currently existing molecular markers (EGFR, KRAS, ALK, PD-L1 and MSI), as well as of future biomarkers that may evolve. Secondary objectives include the evaluation of the differential expression/status of the examined biomarkers (EGFR, KRAS, ALK, PD-L1 and MSI) and standard clinicopathologic parameters including: PFS, OS and treatment response as well as age, gender, smoking history/status, performance status (PS), serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and albumin levels, disease stage, tumor size, histology and grade, presence or absence of brain metastases, presence or absence of liver metastases and number of metastatic sites (all at diagnosis), and treatment data (type of treatment(s) received and treatment response. Potential correlations/interactions between the examined biomarkers will also be explored.
Rationale for conducting this study Rationale for biomarker selection The primary aim of this study is to further clarify the differential expression/status and frequency of EGFR and KRAS mutations, ALK rearrangements, PD-L1 protein and MSI, as well as their association with various clinicopathologic parameters, including treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), in a large and heterogeneous cohort of patients with lung cancer (including both NSCLC and SCLC).
EGFR, KRAS and ALK are among the most clinically important biomarkers of treatment response in NSCLC; EGFR and ALK represent major therapeutic targets in NSCLC. However, relatively little is known as regards their expression and potential clinical significance in SCLC.
PD-L1 protein represents a candidate biomarker of prognosis as well as therapeutic target. Previous experimental and clinical research data have strongly suggested that immune check point inhibitors, including anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 agents, may increase tumor cell vulnerability to immune destruction and potentially improve survival of patients with lung cancer. The MSI phenotype may also affect prognosis of NSCLC patients and response to treatment, including immune checkpoint blockade with PD-1 inhibitors.
Rationale for the use of TMAs TMA-based immunohistochemistry represents an innovative diagnostic approach with several important advantages as compared to conventional immunohistochemical methods. As widely acknowledged, the main and foremost advantage of this technology is its impressive potential to maximize and preserve tissue resources. Moreover, it provides an efficient and cost-effective alternative to conventional histopathologic processing for the performance of large-scale analyses with considerable savings in time, labor, reagents and other laboratory consumables \[31\]. Most importantly, and aside from cost reductions alone, another advantage of the TMA technique is the identical treatment of all studied samples. Since TMAs contain multiple tissue samples on a single slide, all these specimens are simultaneously subjected to the exact same environmental and experimental conditions (i.e. temperature, reagents concentration, incubation time, antigen retrieval procedure). This stands in sharp contrast to the substantial slide-to-slide variability associated with individual processing of whole tissue sections, thus underlying the superior standardization of the TMA technology \[30\].
Briefly, construction of TMAs will allow for simultaneous analysis of a large number of biomarkers, either at the protein or at the RNA level.
Benefit/risk and ethical assessment Potential risks and benefits As this is a non-interventional study, there are no physical potential risks to participants, other than potential breach of confidentiality; for the same reason, there are no potential benefits to participants.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age \>18 years at study enrollment
3. Histologically confirmed NSCLC or SCLC
4. Availability of and access to patients' medical records containing demographic, clinical and treatment data as of lung cancer diagnosis and until the date of patient registration in the study.
5. Representative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Second concomitant malignancy or prior history of other malignancies
3. Known immunodeficiency .
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kostas N.Syrigos
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kostas N.Syrigos
PROFESSOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Konstantinos N Syrigos, MD,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Non-Governmental, Non-Profit Organization
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
OCEBER
Athens, , Greece
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ESR-15-11047
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
D5162C00012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.