The DETOUR 2 Clinical Trial

NCT ID: NCT03119233

Last Updated: 2025-04-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

202 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-12-13

Study Completion Date

2023-11-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Prospective, single-arm, multi-center, international clinical investigation to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the PQ Bypass System to access, deliver guidewires, and implant stent grafts for a percutaneous femoropopliteal (fem-pop) bypass.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The DETOUR2 study is a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, international, non-randomized, safety and effectiveness clinical investigation of the PQ Bypass system.

The PQ Bypass System is intended to improve blood flow in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease due to symptomatic femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions ≥ 20 cm (TASC D) that can include de novo, restenotic, or in-stent restenotic lesions; or Symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions ≥ 24 cm (total lesion length) that can include a chronic total occlusion or a ≥70% lesion that includes de novo, restenotic or in-stent restenosis (complex TASC C), with reference vessel diameters ranging from 5.0 - 6.7 mm, by investigator visual assessment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peripheral Arterial Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single-Arm

This is a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, international clinical investigation to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the DETOUR System, delivery guidewires, and implant stent grafts for percutaneous femoropoliteal bypass compared to Performance Goals (PG)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DETOUR System

Intervention Type DEVICE

The DETOUR System is intended to improve blood flow in patients with peripheral arterial disease in symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions due to chronic total occlusions ≥ 20 cm (TASC D) that can include de novo, restenotic, or in-stent restenotic lesions; or total lesion lengths ≥24 cm that can include chronic total occlusions or a ≥70% lesion that includes de novo, restenotic or in-stent restenosis (complex TASC C).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DETOUR System

The DETOUR System is intended to improve blood flow in patients with peripheral arterial disease in symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions due to chronic total occlusions ≥ 20 cm (TASC D) that can include de novo, restenotic, or in-stent restenotic lesions; or total lesion lengths ≥24 cm that can include chronic total occlusions or a ≥70% lesion that includes de novo, restenotic or in-stent restenosis (complex TASC C).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age \> 18 and ≤ 90 years of age.
2. Willing and able to provide informed consent.
3. Subject is willing to undergo all follow-up assessments according to the specified schedule over 36 months.

4. Chronic, symptomatic lower limb ischemia defined as Rutherford clinical categories 3, 4, or 5.
5. Venous Clinical Severity Score \< 3.
6. Subject is a suitable candidate for angiography and endovascular intervention and, if required, is eligible for standard surgical repair.

7. Symptomatic femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions ≥ 20 cm (TASC D) that can include de novo, restenotic, or in-stent restenotic lesions; or Symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions ≥ 24 cm (total lesion length) that can include a chronic total occlusion or a ≥70% lesion that includes de novo, restenotic or in-stent restenosis (complex TASC C), by investigator visual assessment.
8. Reference vessel diameter ≥ 4.5 and ≤ 6.7 mm, by investigator visual assessment.
9. Subject has a patent popliteal artery (\<50% stenosis) distal to the landing zone
10. Able to successfully access the SFA origin for entry of the crossing device.
11. At least one patent infrapopliteal vessel (\<50% stenosis) with run-off to the ankle or foot.
12. A significant stenosis (≥ 50%) or occlusion of an ipsilateral, inflow artery (e.g. aortoiliac, common femoral) must be successfully treated (use of investigational treatment prohibited) prior to treatment of the target lesion. Successful treatment is defined as no complications and less than 30% residual stenosis following intervention.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Participating in another investigational clinical study.
2. Anticipated life expectancy less than 1 year or medical comorbid condition(s) that could limit the subject's ability to comply with the requirements of the trial.
3. Subject has other medical, social or psychological problems that, in the opinion of the investigator, preclude them from receiving this treatment, and the procedures and evaluations pre- and post-treatment.

4. History of deep vein thrombosis on either limb.
5. Thrombophlebitis, within the previous 30 days.
6. 6\. Planned major amputation of the target limb, including minor amputation (above the ankle).
7. Prior distal amputation (above the transmetatarsal) of the target limb.
8. Known or suspected active infection at the time of the procedure (e.g., WIfI foot infection grade 3: Severe infection. Local infection with systemic inflammatory response syndrome \[SIRS\])
9. Rutherford clinical category 0, 1, 2 or 6.
10. Has acute or chronic renal disease with GFR ≤ 30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and/or elevated serum creatinine \>2.5mg/dL (220µmol/L) or on dialysis.
11. Known hypersensitivity/allergy to the investigational devices and/or required pharmacotherapy that cannot be safely managed.
12. Morbid obesity that does not allow for safe vascular access or imaging.
13. Subject has a known coagulopathy or has bleeding diatheses, thrombocytopenia with platelet count less than 100,000/microliter or INR \> 1.8.
14. Requires coronary or peripheral procedure within 30 days prior to or planned within 30 days post treatment of the target lesion.
15. Has a known history of intracranial bleeding or aneurysm, myocardial infarction or stroke within the last 3 months.
17. Stent within 3 cm of SFA ostium.
18. Previous bypass surgery on the target limb.
19. Subject has significant disease or obstruction (≥50%) of the inflow tract that has not been successfully treated at the time of the index procedure (success measured as ≤30% residual stenosis, without complication)
20. Presence of aneurysm or acute thrombus in the target limb.
21. Thrombolysis of the target vessel within 72 hours prior to the index procedure, where complete resolution of the thrombus was not achieved.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Endologix

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jihad Mustapha, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Advanced Cardiac and Vascular Amputation Prevention Centers

Sean Lyden, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Cleveland Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

HonorHealth

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

St. Bernard's Medical Center

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Arkansas Heart Hospital

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Bay Area Vein and Vascular

Burlingame, California, United States

Site Status

Community Hospital of the Monterrey Peninsula

Monterey, California, United States

Site Status

Advanced Cardiovascular Specialists

Mountain View, California, United States

Site Status

Denver VA Medical Center

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

The Vascular Experts

Darien, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

First Coast Cardiovascular Institute

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Baptist Hospital Miami

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Christie Clinic

Champaign, Illinois, United States

Site Status

AMITA Health Alexian Brothers Medical Center

Elk Grove Village, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Prairie Education and Research Cooperative

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

MedStar Health Research Institute

Hyattsville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

McLaren Bay Region Hospital

Bay City, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Advanced Cardiac and Vascular Amputation Prevention Centers

Grandville, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Cardiac & Vascular Research Center of Nothern Michigan

Petoskey, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Cardiology Associates of North Mississippi

Tupelo, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

New Mexico Heart Institute

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

New York-Presbyterian / Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

North Caroline Hearth and Vascular- University of North Carolina Rex

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

The Christ Hospital - The Carl & Edyth Lindner Center for Research & Education

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinical Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Miriam Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Greenville Health System

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

North Dallas Research Associates

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Tech

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sentara Norfolk General Hospital

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Aurora Research Institute

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Klinikum Hochsauerland GmbH

Arnsberg, , Germany

Site Status

Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Universität Leipzig

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Germany Latvia

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STP 203

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Stellarex Vascular E-Registry
NCT02769273 COMPLETED