Novel Pre-Surgery Exercise-Conditioning in Patients Waiting for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
NCT ID: NCT03113032
Last Updated: 2020-03-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
46 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-05-15
2018-04-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Accelerated Rehabilitation in Individuals After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT07319546
Effect of Preoperative Exercise in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03160534
Innovative Gait Training for People With Knee Osteoarthritis Using Dual Belt Treadmill
NCT05958212
Movement Dynamics of Knee Osteoarthritis and Total Knee Replacement
NCT06829433
Resistance Training in Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT01099371
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Pre-surgery exercise-conditioning:
Studies have investigated the effects of pre-surgery exercise' (also known as pre-habilitation exercise) interventions on strength and sensorimotor performance deficits in patients undergoing TKA, through various modes of exercise. Their aim has been to utilise a period of time pre-surgery to improve patients' rehabilitation status (Huber et al. 2015; Topp et al. 2009; Desmueles et al. 2013; Mackay et al. 2012). However, the patterns of patients' adaptations to the generic exercise stimuli used within these studies, has not shown the gains that had been expected by physiological dose-response, and ultimately questioned the efficacy of using pre-habilitation for effective gains in long-term outcomes. Nevertheless, the concept of achieving early gains to conditioning status that might potentiate patients' later rehabilitation processes and status, remains attractive to the latter (Calatayud et al. 2016, Huber et al. 2015) and the NHS (Rooks et al. 2006; Crowe and Henderson, 2003).
Conditioning for enhanced sensorimotor performance has been consistently endorsed in the sports-medical and sports-performance (Hubscher et al. 2010; Mandelbaum et al. 2005) and clinical literature (Tsao et al. 2007; Granacher et al. 2006) for its causal relationship to reduced injury likelihood and capability to improve function. While the precise dose of stimuli to achieve gains in sensorimotor performance is less clearly defined, enhancing motor performance by means of exercise that resist the effects of gravity or externally-applied loading to a joint system, has established underpinnings physiologically by improving motor performance and indirectly effecting sensorimotor responses (Vikne et al. 2006; Hakan et al. 2002; Moran et al. 2007). Clinically, the challenge has been to formulate a suitably pragmatic programme of conditioning that will accommodate the time- and cost-pressures associated with contemporary care practice while simultaneously offering efficacy when delivered prior to surgery as a pre-habilitative intervention. Rehabilitative and prophylactic conditioning programmes used in current studies for enhanced neuromuscular and sensorimotor performance, have typically required and been delivered in a duration of 6-8-weeks (Calatayud et al. 2016; Huber et al. 2015; Topp et al. 2009; Desmueles et al. 2013; Mackay et al. 2012). This has commanded a substantive logistical burden to elicit expected gains.
A novel approach to conditioning - Development of the P-SEC protocol:
A novel formulation of conditioning that could condense the pattern of delivery of physiologically-effective, dose-related stimuli, while simultaneously maintaining the vast proportion of potential gains in performance, would offer advantages to patients and clinicians for logistical versatility with which a package of conditioning might be delivered. This would be especially important within the relatively short period of time between the patients electing for surgery after clinical consultation and a surgical procedure, if pre-habilitation were to be incorporated effectively within care pathways. Recent studies have shown that with careful periodization and micro-cyclical management of the mode of exercise-conditioning, patterning of exercise intensity and work/recovery ratios, and progression of increasing physiological stimuli for adaptation, it is possible to deliver gains in neuromuscular performance within a programme lasting 2-3-weeks, which match 70% of the effects expected during longer programmes (Peer and Gleeson, in press; Peer et al. under review). Additional adaptations to this intervention model would be needed to counteract arthrogenic and autogenic sources of inhibition associated with long-term disease conditions such as OA (Rice et al. 2010), limiting neuromuscular performance and conditioning gains by the intrusion of nociceptive stimuli such as an increase in intra-articular joint pressure (Palmieri-Smith et al. 2007). The cost-neutrality of the embedding pre-habilitative conditioning for improved motor performance might be feasible if a portion of the end-phase rehabilitation following a surgical procedure, which has been shown recently to offer limited gains in performance within the formal care pathway (Bailey et al. 2014), could be sacrificed in favour of an equivalent time- period of conditioning prior to surgery.
Therefore, the purpose of the P-SEC study is to undertake a randomized controlled feasibility trial in order to investigate the effects of this new formulation of exercise-conditioning for motor performance on objectively-measured and patient-perceived sensorimotor, functional and psychophysiological performance capacities in patients waiting for a TKA.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Exercise group 1
This group of patients will receive the P-SEC exercise intervention protocol on their 'surgical' leg in addition to their normal pre-surgical care.
P-SEC Pre-Surgical Care
The P-SEC protocol is designed to deliver a focal mode of exercise-conditioning for motor performance to the knee extensor musculature. The latter requires a brief, machine-based gravity-resisted joint' movements (\<2 seconds). An exercise session (6-minutes, approximately) will require a patient to undertake 4 sets of movement, with sets separated by 60-seconds recovery (delivering a total of 36 exercises across 3 interspersed days).
Exercise group 2
This group of patients will receive the P-SEC exercise intervention protocol on their 'non-surgical' leg in addition to their normal pre-surgical care.
P-SEC Pre-Surgical Care
The P-SEC protocol is designed to deliver a focal mode of exercise-conditioning for motor performance to the knee extensor musculature. The latter requires a brief, machine-based gravity-resisted joint' movements (\<2 seconds). An exercise session (6-minutes, approximately) will require a patient to undertake 4 sets of movement, with sets separated by 60-seconds recovery (delivering a total of 36 exercises across 3 interspersed days).
Control group
This group of patients will not receive the P-SEC protocol but will follow normal pre-surgical care along with the other two groups of patients.
Normal pre-surgical care
Routine pre-surgical care
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
P-SEC Pre-Surgical Care
The P-SEC protocol is designed to deliver a focal mode of exercise-conditioning for motor performance to the knee extensor musculature. The latter requires a brief, machine-based gravity-resisted joint' movements (\<2 seconds). An exercise session (6-minutes, approximately) will require a patient to undertake 4 sets of movement, with sets separated by 60-seconds recovery (delivering a total of 36 exercises across 3 interspersed days).
Normal pre-surgical care
Routine pre-surgical care
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Rheumatic disorder
* Neurological disorders
* Other orthopaedic conditions affecting lower body function
* Individuals with reduced mental capacity affecting their ability to follow exercise programme
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Queen Margaret University
OTHER
Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District NHS Trust
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nigel Gleeson, Prof.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Queen Margaret University
Anna Maria Risso, Ms
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Queen Margaret University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt NHS Trust Foundation
Oswestry, Gobowen, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Risso AM, van der Linden ML, Bailey A, Gallacher P, Gleeson N. Exploratory insights into novel prehabilitative neuromuscular exercise-conditioning in total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 7;23(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05444-0.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P-SEC001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.