Safety of Accelerated Rule-out Protocols in Patients Admitted With Chest Pain to a Crowded Chest Pain Unit (CPU)

NCT ID: NCT03111862

Last Updated: 2018-12-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

3567 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-01

Study Completion Date

2018-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this observational study registry is to assess the safety of a Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) rapid rule-out strategy as proposed by European Guidelines in patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome to the emergency department.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Design: mono-center observational study in a University chest pain unit

Duration: 12 months recruitment period starting June 2016 with end of recruitment July 2017. In the first 6 months assessment of situation, January 2017 introduction of fast protocols, i.e. 0/1 h as standard, observation of trend changes, utilization rates, safety from January 1st until July 2017. Another 90 days follow-up after last patient in.

Background: Several rule-out protocols recommended by 2015 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, evidence supported by prospectively validated studies. However, no real life experience with ultilization rates and safety.

Particularly overcrowded emergency departments (EDs) or CPUs are likely to benefit most from fast rule-out protocols in order to discharge a substantial proportion of low risk patients.

Study group: consecutive patients presenting to CPU with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) based on chest pain or chest pain equivalent symptoms

Inclusion criteria: eligible to consent, \> 18 years

Exclusion criteria: rule-in, observational zone, chronic hemodialysis, no consent, atrial tachyarrhythmias with chest pain or equivalent.

Data collection on: demographics, rule-out diagnostic protocol (instant cardiac troponin+Copeptin, instant at Limit of Detection, 0-1h, 0-3 h, 0-6 hour, other; time of second sample from admission; turnaround time for first and consecutive sample(s); rates of echo, computed tomography (CT) coronary or CT pulmonary artery, CT chest or CT triple rule-out, chest X-ray, stress test performed or recommended within 3 working days; length of stay in ED, length of stay in hospital including initial referral; rates of admission, discharge or referral; rates of in-hospital percutaneous coronary Intervention (PCI) or coronary artery Bypass graft (CABG), coronary angiography findings based on a definition of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) ≥ 50% stenosis.

Specific data: Number of patients seeking attendance in CPU per day (crowding index), GRACE score, secondary risk factors present or not (leftventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 40%, glomerular filtration rate\< 60 ml/min, Diabetes mellitus, previous myocardial infarction (MI), previous CABG, prior PCI, ST segment depression). Rule-out protocols are stratified by hour ± 30 min, i.e. 0-1 h (±30 min), 0-2 h (±30 min), 0-3 h (±30 min) etc.

Clinical work-up results: stress test before discharge positive or negative, transthoracic echocardiography: wall motion abnormalities, LVEF, valvular heart disease, structural heart disease, Endpoint(s): primary safety endpoint defined as survival free of all-cause death, secondary endpoints: survival free of death or MI, survival free of death/MI/re-hospitalisation for ACS, survival free of death/MI/rehospitalisation for non-elective revascularization

Follow-up: 30 days and 3 months follow-up (FU) for all-cause death, MI, re-hospitalisation for ACS, re-hospitalisation for non-elective PCI or CABG Statistical plan: no sample size calculation, Student´s T-test, ANOVA, Kaplan Meier survival, Cox proportional regression analysis

Milestones: Start immediately after contract for a recruitment period 9/16 - 9/17 (12 months) plus 3 months FU after last patient in. Additional 3 months for completion of files and FU data.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Coronary Syndrome NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

NSTEMI Rule-Out according to hs-TnT

Rule-Out according to the rapid rule-out protocol of the current ESC Guidelines

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* eligible to consent
* \>18 years

Exclusion Criteria

* NSTEMI rule-in
* hs-TnT in observational zone
* chronic hemodialysis
* no consent
* atrial tachyarrhythmias with chest pain or equivalent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Heidelberg

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Moritz Biener

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Moritz Biener, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Heidelberg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universtity Hospital

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Reich C, Yildirim M, Salbach C, Biener M, Lopez-Ayala P, Muller C, Frey N, Giannitsis E. Resolving the observe zone: validation of the ESC 0/3-hour and the APACE criteria for NSTEMI triage. Open Heart. 2025 Mar 28;12(1):e003047. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-003047.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40154974 (View on PubMed)

Neumann JT, Twerenbold R, Ojeda F, Aldous SJ, Allen BR, Apple FS, Babel H, Christenson RH, Cullen L, Di Carluccio E, Doudesis D, Ekelund U, Giannitsis E, Greenslade J, Inoue K, Jernberg T, Kavsak P, Keller T, Lee KK, Lindahl B, Lorenz T, Mahler SA, Mills NL, Mokhtari A, Parsonage W, Pickering JW, Pemberton CJ, Reich C, Richards AM, Sandoval Y, Than MP, Toprak B, Troughton RW, Worster A, Zeller T, Ziegler A, Blankenberg S; ARTEMIS study group. Personalized diagnosis in suspected myocardial infarction. Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Sep;112(9):1288-1301. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02206-3. Epub 2023 May 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37131096 (View on PubMed)

Stoyanov KM, Biener M, Hund H, Mueller-Hennessen M, Vafaie M, Katus HA, Giannitsis E. Effects of crowding in the emergency department on the diagnosis and management of suspected acute coronary syndrome using rapid algorithms: an observational study. BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 8;10(10):e041757. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041757.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33033102 (View on PubMed)

Giannitsis E, Biener M, Hund H, Mueller-Hennessen M, Vafaie M, Gandowitz J, Riedle C, Lohr J, Katus HA, Stoyanov KM. Management and outcomes of patients with unstable angina with undetectable, normal, or intermediate hsTnT levels. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Apr;109(4):476-487. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01529-4. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31325044 (View on PubMed)

Stoyanov KM, Hund H, Biener M, Gandowitz J, Riedle C, Lohr J, Mueller-Hennessen M, Vafaie M, Katus HA, Giannitsis E. RAPID-CPU: a prospective study on implementation of the ESC 0/1-hour algorithm and safety of discharge after rule-out of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Feb;9(1):39-51. doi: 10.1177/2048872619861911. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31298551 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UHHD-BM-004

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

MRI Evaluation of Chest Pain
NCT00001961 COMPLETED PHASE2