Incremental Value of Point of Care H-FABP Testing in Primary Care Patients Suspected of Acute Coronary Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT01826994
Last Updated: 2017-04-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
303 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-09-30
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Thoracic complaints, possibly due to a cardiac ischemic cause are a diagnostic challenge in general practice. When an underlying ischemic cardiac condition (AMI (acute myocardial infarction), UAP (unstable angina pectoris)) is considered, referral from general practitioner (GP) to a cardiologist has to take place. However, cardiac analysis in 80% of referred patients is negative. To optimize referral decisions of GPs, new and fast diagnostics are needed.
Objective:
To assess the incremental diagnostic value for AMI of a novel rapid PoC H-FABP-test in addition to history taking and physical examination in patients presenting in daily general practice with possible AMI. In addition the cost-effectiveness of the test will be evaluated.
Study design:
Delayed type cross-sectional diagnostic study.
Study population:
Patients presenting to the GP with any new-onset chest complaint, at time of presentation not lasting for more than 24 hours, that is considered to be of possible cardiac origin by the GP.
Intervention:
Point of care Heart Type Fatty Acid Binding Protein test (PoC H-FABP-test), added to usual care. PoC H-FABP-testing, by qualitatively measuring H-FABP in one single drop of blood obtained by finger prick, is added to normal procedures of consultation and referral decision by the GP.
Main study parameters / endpoints:
Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of point of care H-FABP-testing for AMI, alone as well as part of a clinical diagnostic algorithm, in patients with thoracic complaints in general practice. All outcome measures, based on using an algorithm and/or point of care H-FABP-testing, will be compared to regular diagnostic assessment by the GP without using an algorithm and/or point of care H-FABP-testing. Therefore, incremental value of H-FABP-testing and/or a diagnostic algorithm is measured.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:
Individual participants will experience low risk, since study participation comprehends regular care except for an extra finger prick and possibly collection of one extra venous blood sample. For this low amount of disadvantage, the participant will experience no advantage either. However, results of the study will possibly be useful for similar patients in future.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pre-hOspital Evaluation of Chest Pain Patients With sUspected Non ST-segment eLevation myocARdial Infarction Using the HEART-score With a Troponin Point-of-care Test
NCT04851418
Safety of Accelerated Rule-out Protocols in Patients Admitted With Chest Pain to a Crowded Chest Pain Unit (CPU)
NCT03111862
Diagnostic Value of Heart-Fatty Acid Binding Protein and Ischemia Modified Albumin as Biochemical Markers on Non ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome at the Emergency Room.
NCT00714298
Outpatient Evaluation of Patients With Known or Suspected Heart Disease
NCT00001400
One-hour Diagnostic Algorithm for NSTEMI
NCT03507270
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
patients
heart type fatty acid binding protein testing
heart type fatty acid binding protein testing
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
heart type fatty acid binding protein testing
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* In case of death of identified cause patients are included as well.
Exclusion Criteria
* symptoms are present for more than 24 hours
* oral informed consent is not given during presentation
* written informed consent is refused afterwards
* a traumatic cause is present
* complaints are presented that can be regarded as a recurrence of earlier complaints with clear diagnosis in the past
* death of unidentified cause.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
FABPulous B.V.
OTHER
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Geert Jan Dinant, professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Maastricht University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
ACHG
Leuven, Vlaams Brabant, Belgium
HOZL
Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands
ZIO
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Omnes
Sittard, Limburg, Netherlands
Cohesie
Venlo, Limburg, Netherlands
BeRoEmD
's-Hertogenbosch, North Brabant, Netherlands
SGE
Eindhoven, North Brabant, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Willemsen RT, Buntinx F, Winkens B, Glatz JF, Dinant GJ; 'RAPIDA'-study team. The value of signs, symptoms and plasma heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) in evaluating patients presenting with symptoms possibly matching acute coronary syndrome: background and methods of a diagnostic study in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Dec 12;15:203. doi: 10.1186/s12875-014-0203-8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ABR registry
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
13-3-015
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.