Cellulose Triacetate Dialyzer in Hemodiafiltration-online
NCT ID: NCT03105817
Last Updated: 2017-04-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
23 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-02-01
2016-08-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The allergy problems described with these membranes require the development of other membranes capable of performing this treatment. We describe in vivo performance and behaviour of an asymmetric cellulose triacetate(ATA™) membrane, to identify its depurative effectiveness and ease of use in clinical practice, as well as evaluate its biocompatibility in a single haemodialysis session (acute biocompatibility) and after one month of treatment (chronic).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Toxins Removal and Inflammatory State modulAtion During Online Hemodiafiltration: Comparison of Two Different Dialyzers
NCT04554498
Strategies for Asymmetrical Triacetate Dialyzer Heparin-Free Effective Hemodialysis
NCT04381234
The Effect of High-flux Hemodialysis and On-line Hemodiafiltration on Endothelial Function.
NCT03942744
PMMA vs Polysulfone in SARS-CoV-2 Infection Hemodialysis Patients
NCT05040737
Citrate Dialysate in Online Hemodialfiltration
NCT05280106
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Design of the study Each patient underwent 12 sessions of haemodialysis with the usual schedule and monitor: 5008 of Fresenius (n=14), AK200US (n=5) and Artis of Gambro (n=3) and DBB007 of Nikkiso (n=1) all suitable for OLHDF, although with different convective transport control systems. The nursing staff connected the automatic OLHDF system. In the case where the system was Ultracontrol® (Gambro monitors) if alarm of PTM\> 300 mmHg or system pressure (PSist)\> 700 mmHg appeared and were not solved, Ultracontrol® would be withdrawn and the pressure-control system would be used.
* Data to be collected:
1. Demographic and dialysis data
* Demographic: sex, age, underlying disease, time in OLHDF, type of vascular access: fistula (AFV) and catheter (CT).
* Dialysis Data: Monitor, dialysis fluid composition, sodium conductivity and bicarbonate concentration, dialysis fluid flow (Qd, ml min), liquid temperature, heparin type and dosage.
* Each dialysis session: effective time (TE, min), blood flow (Qb, ml min), ultra-filtrated volume to achieve dry weight (UF, l/session), Vinf (l/session), infusion rate, (Qi, ml/min) Kt (l / session), maximum PTM and maximum Psist in Ultracontrol® (mmHg) and the technical complications, alarms and coagulation problems of the system that may appear.
The filtration fraction (FF) was calculated as the percentage of Qi relative to Qb. The convective volume (Vconv) was defined as the total ultra-filtrated volume, which is the sum of VI and UF.7
2. Analytical determinations
1. Blood
\- On the first and last day of the study pre-dialysis samples were taken for the measurement of monocytes, IL-6 and IL-1β.
* On the interval day of the first week, 3 blood samples were taken: 1st) at the beginning (CI), 2nd) at 30 min (CM) and the 3rd) at the end of the dialysis session (CP).
In CI and CP the following parameters were measured: haemoglobin, proteins and albumin, urea, phosphorus, creatinine, uric acid, β2-microglobulin, myoglobin and retinol transport protein (RTP).
Leukocytes, platelets, C3a and C5a were quantified in CI and CM.
\--- Laboratory determinations
\- General biochemical data: haemoglobin, proteins, albumin, urea, phosphorus, reactive protein C (PCR), creatinine and uric acid, β2-microglobulin, myoglobin, and (RTP) were determined with the usual analyser of each hospital.
\- Determinations of monocytes, complement, IL-6 and IL-1β were performed in the laboratory of the University of Alcalá:
* Activation of plasma complement using a sandwich ELISA: Determination of C3a and C5a activation was performed on platelet rich plasma samples using commercially available ELISA kits C3a Elabscience (Wuhan, P.R. China) and ELISA C5a RayBiotech (Norcross, Georgia).
* Determination of interleukin concentration in serum using a sandwich ELISA: IL-6 and IL-1β concentrations were measured in serum samples obtained from whole blood and stored at -80 ° C until use. Both kits used were supplied by Abcam (Cambridge, UK)
* Determination of monocyte subpopulations: The different subpopulations of circulating monocytes in peripheral blood were identified by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur™, Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). First of all, the monocyte population was selected according to size (FSC/forward scatter) and granularity (SSC/side scatter) and then the different subpopulations were selected by double immunofluorescence according to staining with the anti-CD14 conjugated Tricolor (monoclonal antibodies TuK4) and anti-CD16 conjugated FITC (monoclonal antibodies 3G8). Both antibodies and their respective isotype controls were purchased from Life Technologies Invitrogen (California, USA). The analysis was performed with the Cyflogic program.
* Calculations The percentages of reduction (RR) were calculated with the formula: RR (%) = \[(Cpre - Cpos) / Cpre\] x 100, where Cpre and Cpos are the concentrations of the analysed substances pre- and post-dialysis.
For protein bound substances and β2-microglobulin concentrations at the end of the session were corrected for haemoconcentration by a correction factor (FC) based on plasma protein concentration (PT):
FC = PTpre / PTpos, where PTpre and PTpos are the total concentration of proteins pre-dialysis and post-dialysis.
\--- Statistical analysis All data was collected in a database (SPSS version 15). Each value was obtained with the average of the values obtained in the different sessions or analytical determinations.
For the statistical analysis, descriptive tools were used, showing the average (standard deviation), median, quartiles or percentages as appropriate. For the comparison of two independent continuous variables, the Student t test for paired samples was used. For the comparison of more than two quantitative variables the ANOVA test was used. The p \<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Asymmetric cellulose triacetate (ATA™)
Each patient underwent 12 sessions of haemodialysis with the usual schedule, changing the usual dialyzer
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Marta Albalate Ramón
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Maduell F, Navarro V, Hernandez-Jaras J, Calvo C. [Comparison of dialyzers in on-line hemodiafiltration]. Nefrologia. 2000 May-Jun;20(3):269-76. Spanish.
Sunohara T, Masuda T. Fundamental Characteristics of the Newly Developed ATA Membrane Dialyzer. Contrib Nephrol. 2017;189:215-221. doi: 10.1159/000451044. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
Sanchez-Villanueva RJ, Gonzalez E, Quirce S, Diaz R, Alvarez L, Menendez D, Rodriguez-Gayo L, Bajo MA, Selgas R. Hypersensitivity reactions to synthetic haemodialysis membranes. Nefrologia. 2014;34(4):520-5. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2014.May.12552. English, Spanish.
Mineshima M. Optimal Design of Dialyzers. Contrib Nephrol. 2017;189:204-209. doi: 10.1159/000450802. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
Sunohara T, Masuda T. Cellulose triacetate as a high-performance membrane. Contrib Nephrol. 2011;173:156-163. doi: 10.1159/000329055. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LIB 09/2015
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.