Assessment of a New Protocol for Indirect Pulp Capping Procedures
NCT ID: NCT03071588
Last Updated: 2018-03-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
86 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-07-31
2018-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Partial Pulpotomy in Mature Permanent Teeth With Signs and Symptoms of Irreversible Pulpits
NCT04870398
Efficacy of Calcium Silicate Pulp-capping; a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT02201641
Pulpotomy vs.Root Canal Treatment in Managing Irreversible Pulpitis
NCT03956199
Outcome of Direct Pulp Capping and Partial Pulpotomy in Reversible Pulpitis
NCT07300124
Long-term Evaluation of Direct Pulp Capping
NCT03403985
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study carried out at King's College London/ Dental Institute at Guy's Hospital and form part of the routine dental treatment done at the emergency dental clinics with the exception of the CBCT scans. Volunteers given written information about the process and given time to consider participation. Once any questions have been answered, fully informed written consent obtained if they are interested in taking part. At least one deep cavity causing toothache requiring indirect pulp capping detected and diagnosed through conventional clinical and Xray dental assessment. The procedure involves removal of the decay using one of the proposed clinical techniques and the placement of a pulp capping material according to manufacturer's instructions and the definitive filling will be placed, follow up will at 12 months. Radiographic assessment including cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be done at baseline and 12 months. It is hoped that data analysed from this study will provide a definitive clinical and radiographic evidence base for the outcome of the indirect pulp capping operative treatment procedure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
the conventional protocol in indirect pulp capping include the use of mechanical rotary burs for caries removal in teeth with reversible pulpitis.
Mechanical rotary burs
A rotary drill made of steel or diamond impregnated materials attached to a steel shank, available in varying degree of sharpness, lengths and sizes used conventionally in preparation of teeth to receive a dental restoration.
Conservative
the conservative protocol of indirect pulp capping include the use of Carisolv gel for caries removal in teeth with reversible pulpitis.
Carisolv gel
A chemical gel made of a combination of amino acids and sodium hypochlorite used with hand instruments to soften and remove the decay to prepare the tooth to receive a dental restoration.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mechanical rotary burs
A rotary drill made of steel or diamond impregnated materials attached to a steel shank, available in varying degree of sharpness, lengths and sizes used conventionally in preparation of teeth to receive a dental restoration.
Carisolv gel
A chemical gel made of a combination of amino acids and sodium hypochlorite used with hand instruments to soften and remove the decay to prepare the tooth to receive a dental restoration.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
King's College London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Francesco Mannocci
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
King's College London
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ali AH, Thani FB, Foschi F, Banerjee A, Mannocci F. Self-Limiting versus Rotary Subjective Carious Tissue Removal: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial-2-Year Results. J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 25;9(9):2738. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092738.
Ali AH, Koller G, Foschi F, Andiappan M, Bruce KD, Banerjee A, Mannocci F. Self-Limiting versus Conventional Caries Removal: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Dent Res. 2018 Oct;97(11):1207-1213. doi: 10.1177/0022034518769255. Epub 2018 May 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
14/LO/0880
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.