The Use of Alloderm Versus Dermacell in Immediate Implant Based Breast Reconstruction

NCT ID: NCT03064893

Last Updated: 2026-01-30

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

62 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-06

Study Completion Date

2019-02-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy has been shown to provide psychosocial benefits to breast cancer patients and is considered an integral part of breast cancer treatment. In general, breast reconstruction can be accomplished using the patients own tissues or implantable prosthetic devices. Various acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are offered on the market and the costs vary widely despite very similar qualities. The two most commonly used ADM products in North America by far are Dermacell and Alloderm. The difference between the two products include a) level of sterility, with Dermacell being sterilized to 10-9 while Alloderm is sterilized to 10-6 and b) the consistency and thickness of the biologic material and c) a significant different in cost ($2200 CAD vs $3600, respectively). Each product has shown to be safe and effective. As such, clinical equipoise exists. This will be a pragmatic trial to evaluate Dermacell with Alloderm in a head to head randomized fashion, with regards to the postoperative complications, namely infection, seroma formation (as measured by drain duration and output), loss of implant, incidence of revisional surgery and capsular contracture.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Reconstruction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dermacell

Device for immediate implant based breast reconstruction

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dermacell

Intervention Type DEVICE

Reconstruction material

Alloderm

Device for immediate implant based breast reconstruction

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Alloderm

Intervention Type DEVICE

Reconstruction material

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Alloderm

Reconstruction material

Intervention Type DEVICE

Dermacell

Reconstruction material

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female patient
* Ages 20-90
* All patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer or prophylaxis for breast cancer with immediate implant-based reconstruction
* Able to provide verbal consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who have had prior chest wall or irradiation on the reconstructed side
* Patients not undergoing immediate breast reconstruction at the time of mastectomy
* Any patient with a contraindication to immediate breast reconstruction
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Angel Arnaout, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Ottawa Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Ottawa Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Arnaout A, Zhang J, Frank S, Momtazi M, Cordeiro E, Roberts A, Ghumman A, Fergusson D, Stober C, Pond G, Jeong A, Vandermeer L, Hutton B, Clemons M, On Behalf Of The REaCT Investigators. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Alloderm-RTU with DermACELL in Immediate Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Curr Oncol. 2020 Dec 25;28(1):184-195. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28010020.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33704185 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://react.ohri.ca/

The Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OTT 16-06

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.