Autologous vs. Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

NCT ID: NCT06195865

Last Updated: 2025-07-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

250 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-01

Study Completion Date

2031-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Although breast reconstruction is an integral part of breast cancer treatment, there is little high-quality evidence to indicate which method is the most effective. The objective of this study is to compare implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction, in non-radiated patients. The primary outcome is patient reported breast-specific quality of life/satisfaction and the secondary outcomes are complications, factors affecting satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. Moreover, the study aims to improve the evidence for trial decision-making in breast reconstruction. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are generally thought to provide the most solid scientific evidence, but there are significant barriers to conducting RCTs in breast reconstruction, making both recruitment and achieving unbiased and generalisable results a challenge. The study design partially randomised patient preference trial (RPPT) might be a way to overcome these challenges. In the present study, patients who consent to randomisation will be randomised to implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction, whereas patients with strong preferences will be able to choose method. The study is designed as a superiority trial based on BREAST-Q and 124 participants will be randomised. In the preference cohort patients will be included until 62 participants have selected the least popular alternative. Follow-up will be 60-months. Embedded qualitative studies and within-trial economic evaluation will be performed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Randomised DIEP flap

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

DIEP-flap

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap

Randomised implant-based

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Implant

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Breast reconstruction with an implant-based technique

Preference DIEP-flap

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

DIEP-flap

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap

Preference implant-based

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Implant

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Breast reconstruction with an implant-based technique

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DIEP-flap

Breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Implant

Breast reconstruction with an implant-based technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Biological female
* \>18 years of age
* American Society of anesthesiologist classification (ASA) 1-2
* Patient must have had or be scheduled for a mastectomy
* Ability to give informed consent
* Ability to communicate in Swedish

Exclusion Criteria

* ASA \> 2
* BMI \> 30 kg/m2
* Smoking1 radiotherapy to the breast in question.
* Radiotherapy is expected post-operatively.
* Locally advanced breast cancer
* Metastasised breast cancer
* Comorbidity and/or drugs that affect wound healing.
* Unstable psychiatric co-morbidity
* Abdominal scaring/chest scaring making a DIEP/implant-based reconstruction unsuitable
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Göteborg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vastra Gotaland Region

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sahlgrenska university hospital

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status RECRUITING

Sahlgrenska university hospital

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Emma Hansson, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+46313421000

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Emma Hansson, PhD

Role: primary

+46 31 342 10 00

Emma Hansson, PhD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hansson E, Lofstrand J, Larsson C, Uusimaki A, Svensson K, Ekman A, Svensson M, Paganini A. Gothenburg Breast reconstruction (GoBreast) II protocol: a Swedish partially randomised patient preference, superiority trial comparing autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction. BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 17;14(7):e084025. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084025.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39019639 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023-04754-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.