Search of a Paradoxical Fall in Maximum Expiratory Flow After Bronchodilation in Healthy Subjects

NCT ID: NCT03062904

Last Updated: 2018-05-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

65 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There exists a physiological limitation of the expiratory flows because of the physical properties of the bronchial tree (flexible bronchial walls in a complex architecture subjected to variations of pressure and volume). For a given lung, in a given state, for each pulmonary volume there is a corresponding Maximum Expiratory Flow (MEF). In healthy subject, the bronchial smooth muscles have a basal tonicity which is not negligible. If the tonicity is increased, this generally leads to a reduction in MEF. If it is decreased, MEF rather tends to increase, there are healthy individuals for whom the inhibition of the contraction of the bronchial smooth muscles by inhalation of bronchodilatator leads to a reduction in the MEF: this is called "paradoxical effect". When this reduction exists, it appears it occurs at low pulmonary volumes (approximately 50% for a volume of less than 25% of the CV). Under this circumstance, it seems that the basal tonicity of the bronchial smooth muscles would fight against the expiratory collapse of the bronchi, and this would happen especially for distal bronchi, for low pulmonary volume and for forceful expiration. The existence of such a phenomenon would be in favour of a "stiffening" role of the bronchial smooth muscles. The bronchial smooth muscles would not be only harmful cells causing of the asthma attacks.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There exists a physiological limitation of the expiratory flows because of the physical properties of the bronchial tree (flexible bronchial walls in a complex architecture subjected to variations of pressure and volume). For a given lung, in a given state, for each pulmonary volume there is a corresponding Maximum Expiratory Flow (MEF). In healthy subject, the bronchial smooth muscles have a basal tonicity which is not negligible. If the tonicity is increased, this generally leads to a reduction in MEF. If it is decreased, MEF rather tends to increase, there are healthy individuals for whom the inhibition of the contraction of the bronchial smooth muscles by inhalation of bronchodilatator leads to a reduction in the MEF: this is called "paradoxical effect". When this reduction exists, it appears it occurs at low pulmonary volumes (approximately 50% for a volume of less than 25% of the CV). Under this circumstance, it seems that the basal tonicity of the bronchial smooth muscles would fight against the expiratory collapse of the bronchi, and this would happen especially for distal bronchi, for low pulmonary volume and for forceful expiration. The existence of such a phenomenon would be in favour of a "stiffening" role of the bronchial smooth muscles. The bronchial smooth muscles would not be only harmful cells causing of the asthma attacks.

Primary end-point:

The aim of this study is to evaluate the occurrence or increase of the Expiratory Flow Limitation (EFL) under either Negative Expiratory Pressure (NEP) or submaximal gentle forced expiratory manoeuvres (partial flow-volume loops at tidal volume) after bronchodilation in certain healthy men breathing at low pulmonary volumes (by applying a chest wall strapping).

Secondary end-point:

The secondary objectives are

* to evaluate the effect of the fall of the tonicity of the bronchial smooth muscles (normal and constrained pulmonary volumes) on the following criteria/variables:

* the closing volume: we would expect an increase of it.
* modifications of forced flow-volume loop; we would expect a reduction in the MEF at low lung volumes.
* some modifications of the Pulmonary Function Test (PFT); we would expect an absence of significant difference in certain pulmonary volumes (Vital Capacity - VC, Total Lung Capacity -TLC,…), perhaps with a reduction in the Inspiratory Capacity (IC), an increase in airways resistances by high frequency oscillation
* Validation of the digital model of expiration of Florens-Filoche: towards a tool of assistance to the interpretation of the PFT.

During the various experimental sessions, we will record a certain "number" of variables that will be necessary to "feed" the final model of Florens-Filoche, such as:

* Oesophageal Pressure, Mouth Pressure: continuously. Static oesophageal pressure at:
* Residual Volume -RV, TLC, VC
* flows and pulmonary volumes continuously.

This study will attempt to develop a tool to assist in the interpretation of the PFT:

* earlier disease detection (of the bronchial smooth muscles),
* better follow-up of obstructive pathologies, their response to the treatment,
* simplification of the diagnosis of asthma,
* automation of interpretation…

Study Design:

The study includes 3 visits, as follows:

Visit 0:

Anthropometric characteristics Medical screening and eligibility criteria Chest X-ray ECG Blood pressure Pulse oximetry, heart rate PFT

Visit 1:

The first visit (V1) will last 3h and 30 minutes roughly and will consist of:

* PFT: spirometry, maximal flow-volume loops (MFVL), in sitting position.
* Closing Volume and airways resistances in sitting position.
* Insertion of a small oesophageal catheter for continuous monitoring of the oesophageal pressure and measurement of static pressure at some volumes
* Thoraco-abdominal (chest wall) strapping
* Measures of slow VC and MFVL in lying position
* Either NEP in lying position or submaximal gentle forced expiratory manoeuvres (partial flow-volume loops at tidal volume)
* Removal of the thoraco-abdominal (chest wall) strapping
* Test of Bronchodilatation (combined Salbutamol 200μg and Ipratropium bromure 80μg; 2 inhalations): wait 30 min and then
* Thoraco-abdominal (chest wall) strapping
* Either NEP or submaximal gentle forced expiratory manoeuvres (partial flow-volume loops at tidal volume)
* Measures of slow VC and MFVL in lying position
* Removal of the thoraco-abdominal (chest wall) strapping
* Measures of slow VC and MFVL in sitting position
* Removal of the small oesophageal catheter
* Closing Volume and airways resistances in sitting position

Each measurement will be repeated at least 3 times, until at least 2 reproducible measurements are obtained.

Visit 2:

The second meeting (V2) will be proposed only to participants who will present with a reduction in some of their MEF at the time of V1 of the protocol. It will consist of Methacholine Challenge Test. The duration of this test is approximately 1 hour.

Number of Subjects to be included: 65 healthy subjects under 35y are necessary find at lest 6 subjects presenting with a "paradoxal effect".

Duration of the study: two years

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Paradoxical Fall in Maximum Expiratory Flows

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

drug

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Inhaled Bronchodilators +/- Inhaled Methacholine

Intervention Type DRUG

1. Combined Salbutamol 200μg and Ipratropium bromure 80μg (2 inhalations) if paradoxal answer
2. Inhaled Methacholine based on international recommendations

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Inhaled Bronchodilators +/- Inhaled Methacholine

1. Combined Salbutamol 200μg and Ipratropium bromure 80μg (2 inhalations) if paradoxal answer
2. Inhaled Methacholine based on international recommendations

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

All the volunteers will:

* be between 18 and 35 years/old
* be male (because of binding thoracic, more difficult to realize and more uncomfortable in the female subjects)
* have to understand French
* have to be affiliated to the social security
* have to be "non smokers, or having never smoked"
* have to have read and have understood the information record
* have to have signed the informed consent
* have to not to be involved in a former scientific study.
* abnormal PFT (at least one value below the lower limit of normal)
* Abnormal chest radiography
* Abnormal ECG

Exclusion Criteria

* Chronic pathology
* Long-standing treatments, recent vaccination (\< 3 weeks), recent bronchitis (\< 3 weeks)
* Cardio-respiratory diseases, in particular: asthma, COPD, previous pneumothorax, hemoptyses, acute coronary syndrome, uncontrolled and/or untreated cardiac arrhythmia, bradycardia (\<55bpm), arterial hypertension (diastolic\>95mmHg, systolic\>150mmHg),
* Current abdominal disease (clinical or known hepatomegaly, irritable bowel syndrome, etc…), gastro-oesophageal reflux
* BMI \< 18 and \> 26
* Disorder of coagulation (and anticoagulant treatment), frequent epistaxis
* Porphyrae
* Epilepsy, Cerebrovascular accident (stroke or transient ischemic attack) \< 3 months
* Severe hepatic Insufficiency
* Glaucoma
* Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
* Allergy: latex, lidocaine, salbutamol, ipratropium or parasympathomimetic agents
* Current allergic rhino-conjunctivitis
* History of previous oedema of Quincke or anaphylactic shock
* Aneurism of the aorta, cerebral aneurism or another arterial aneurism
* Myasthenia
* Thyroid disorders
* Protected underage child and adults
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pierantonio Laveneziana, MCUPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital

Paris, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Pierantonio Laveneziana, MCUPH

Role: CONTACT

00 33 (0) 1 42 17 85 84

Claudia Llontop Guzman, PH

Role: CONTACT

00 33 (0) 1 42 17 85 13

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Eric DASQUE, Nurse

Role: primary

00 33 (0) 1 42 17 85 34

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012-A01643-40

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

P120301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.